Paper in Nature proves a 15-year GW hiatus

Corazón said:
Holy fuck just how stupid are you anyway? I knew as soon as I saw the Guardian name that it would another bullshit article by Dana Nuccitelli. The Guardian has very little credibility on climate matters and Nuccitelli has absolutely none. It shows how little you really know if you post an old article by that clown.

Nuccitelli is a dumb fucker with no qualifications in any of the physical sciences who, for all his blathering about Big Oil, actually works for Tetratech, a gas and oil company. Suffice to say that when the Guardian found that out, they dispensed with the scumbag's services. Now if you had any background you'd know that and wouldn't come here to get your arse kicked.
Click to expand...

But the "no trick zone" or the other Flat Earther websites you just cited do have credibility, beautiful

Don't know who the individual is nor do I care, but they did leave sources for the reader to check if they wanted to verify the articles claim as legitimate, besides, just the mere fact that they established that NASA has up to 18,000 active employees, and when adding in all former employees, fifty is a unrepresentative number
 
archives said:
But the "no trick zone" or the other Flat Earther websites you just cited do have credibility, beautiful

Don't know who the individual is nor do I care, but they did leave sources for the reader to check if they wanted to verify the articles claim as legitimate, besides, just the mere fact that they established that NASA has up to 18,000 active employees, and when adding in all former employees, fifty is a unrepresentative number
Click to expand...

Most, if not all of them, are retired so they don't have to kowtow to NASA management. I am guessing that you're a bit wet behind the ears otherwise you'd recognise some of those illustrious names. Anyway you've revealed to me that you're none too bright so further discourse on this subject is pointless.
 
Antifa said:
Was this some guys blog presented in PDF format like last time you had a "definitive peer reviewed study proving GW false", Tom?
Click to expand...

No, it is a paper published in Nature and one of the contributors is Michael Mann. I know that blows your mind so I doubt if you'll be back anytime soon.
 
Corazón said:
No, it is a paper published in Nature and one of the contributors is Michael Mann. I know that blows your mind so I doubt if you'll be back anytime soon.
Click to expand...

No, it's a blog editorializing a nature article that is linked to but not provided without payment of a fee to Nature. You have not provided your source material at all. You can't know what it says. For all you know page two reads : "Cornholio is a serial butt muncher"

I suspect that is what it does say.
 
Corazón said:
What is most remarkable about this paper is that Michael 'Hockey Stick' Mann put his name to it. Just wish I had a pound for every time some fool on here tried to deny the science. Of course you will never have read about it on the BBC, or in the WaPo, NYT, or any of the warmist blogs.



https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/...-hiatus-is-real-so-why-dont-we-hear-about-it/
Click to expand...

Groan away Mark, but the facts are that this paper was published in Nature and Michael Mann gave it his imprimatur. So deal with it!
 
Last edited:
Corazón said:
No, it is a paper published in Nature and one of the contributors is Michael Mann. I know that blows your mind so I doubt if you'll be back anytime soon.
Click to expand...

You mean the same Michael Mann that publishes in the "Guardian," you know, the source you said had "no credibility"

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/28/climate-change-hurricane-harvey-more-deadly

And ironically he concluded that "climate change worsened the impact of Hurricane Harvey."

Amazing, you attacked sources, made even funnier given the "sources" you cite, but you never addressed the intial documentation that I provided, says it all
 
archives said:
You mean the same Michael Mann that publishes in the "Guardian," you know, the source you said had "no credibility"

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/28/climate-change-hurricane-harvey-more-deadly

And ironically he concluded that "climate change worsened the impact of Hurricane Harvey."

Amazing, you attacked sources, made even funnier given the "sources" you cite, but you never addressed the intial documentation that I provided, says it all
Click to expand...


Sorry sonny but you are part of the JV team, you just don't cut the mustard.
 
Research into the nature and causes
of the slowdown has triggered improved
understanding of observational biases,
radiative forcing and internal variability.
This has led to widespread recognition that
modulation by internal variability is large
enough to produce a significantly reduced
rate of surface temperature increase for
a decade or even more — particularly if
internal variability is augmented by the
....
, and a coherent global network of
externally driven cooling caused by a
succession of volcanic eruptions. The legacy
of this new understanding will certainly
outlive the recent warming slowdown. This
is particularly true in the embryonic field
of decadal climate prediction, where the
challenge is to simulate how the combined
effects of external forcing and internal
variability produce the time-evolving
regional climate we will experience over the
next ten years
 
Corazón said:
Holy fuck just how stupid are you anyway? I knew as soon as I saw the Guardian name that it would another bullshit article by Dana Nuccitelli. The Guardian has very little credibility on climate matters and Nuccitelli has absolutely none. It shows how little you really know if you post an old article by that clown.

Nuccitelli is a dumb fucker with no qualifications in any of the physical sciences who, for all his blathering about Big Oil, actually works for Tetratech, a gas and oil company. Now if you had any background you'd know that and wouldn't come here to get your arse kicked.


https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...uses-pseudo-science-to-libel-dr-john-christy/
Click to expand...

Tetratech, just an oil and gas company? Another lie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top