cancel2 2022
Canceled
Oh dear, they say empty vessels make the most noise.
http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/07/dana-nuccitellis-paycheck-funded-by.html?m=1
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Paper in Nature proves a 15-year GW hiatus
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/07/dana-nuccitellis-paycheck-funded-by.html?m=1
Oh dear, they say empty vessels make the most noise.
http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/07/dana-nuccitellis-paycheck-funded-by.html?m=1
Their home page, fucking idiot. Sure, they are nothing but a gas and oil company.
http://www.tetratech.com/
Not my fault that you're too stupid to understand the Arrhenius equation for CO2 climate forcing and Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS).
You cherry picked sites and failed to include uncertainties in order to bolster your lame claims. Scientific dishonesty
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yes I chose to use the climate sensitivity equation published by the IPCC, how remiss of me. Anyway you've revealed that you don't have any background in science and are far more concerned with scoring points than honest discourse. I will discuss it no further with you.You cherry picked sites and failed to include uncertainties in order to bolster your lame claims. Scientific dishonesty
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Spin it as much as you want, the facts say that Nutterelli is supported by Big Oil.Their home page, fucking idiot. Sure, they are nothing but a gas and oil company.
http://www.tetratech.com/
Yes I chose to use the climate sensitivity equation published by the IPCC, how remiss of me. Anyway you've revealed that you don't have any background in science and are far more concerned with scoring points than honest discourse. I will discuss it no further with you.
Stupid fuck, you cited three different references, all with different Delta Ts, and didn't include the uncertainties in any.
Spin it as much as you want, the facts say that Nutterelli is supported by Big Oil.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
For a supposedly grown man, you're very childish and prone to tantrums.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
For the fifty millionth time the equation for radiative forcing is expressed in units of watts/m2 and αis a constant currently defined by the IPCC as 5.35 for CO2Stupid fuck, you cited three different references, all with different Delta Ts, and didn't include the uncertainties in any.
ΔF = αln C1/C0
You just seem totally incapable of understanding so what's the point?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Don't ask me any more as I can't be bothered talking to ignorant fools.For the fifty millionth time the equation for radiative forcing is expressed in units of watts/m2 and αis a constant currently defined by the IPCC as 5.35 for CO2
ΔF = αln C1/C0
You just seem totally incapable of understanding so what's the point?
For the fifty millionth time the equation for radiative forcing is expressed in units of watts/m2 and αis a constant currently defined by the IPCC as 5.35 for CO2
ΔF = αln C1/C0
You just seem totally incapable of understanding so what's the point?
Delta F predicts a certain Delta T. It's the DeltaT you were cherry picking and failed to include the uncertainty range.
And you continue to do so.
Don't ask me any more as I can't be bothered talking to ignorant fools.
This is too funny, you prove the guy wrong over and over providing ample documentation and he comes back with, "don't ask me any more I can't be bothered talking to ignorant fools" beautiful
Often after his third or fourth attempted rebuttal you'd swear you were exchanging with a character straight out of the film Idiocracy
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You haven't proved anything other than you have a clue.This is too funny, you prove the guy wrong over and over providing ample documentation and he comes back with, "don't ask me any more I can't be bothered talking to ignorant fools" beautiful
Often after his third or fourth attempted rebuttal you'd swear you were exchanging with a character straight out of the film Idiocracy
For a supposedly grown man, you're very childish and prone to tantrums.
I accept your concession.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yes and I said all that before, I am not going through it again.Delta F predicts a certain Delta T. It's the DeltaT you were cherry picking and failed to include the uncertainty range.
And you continue to do so.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Don't call me a fucking idiot, cunt!!Their home page, fucking idiot. Sure, they are nothing but a gas and oil company.
http://www.tetratech.com/
This is too funny, you prove the guy wrong over and over providing ample documentation and he comes back with, "don't ask me any more I can't be bothered talking to ignorant fools" beautiful
Often after his third or fourth attempted rebuttal you'd swear you were exchanging with a character straight out of the film Idiocracy
The cherry picker cited Delta Ts of 1, 1.5 and 2 something, but never included (conveniently) the range of uncertainty. Why? Because it doesn't serve his narrow purpose.
Don't call me a fucking idiot, cunt!!
Yep. Tetratech is nothing but an oil and gas company.
Fool!
Yes and I said all that before, I am not going through it again.
I understand why you don't. It was embarrassing for you the first few times.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're a cunt, can't be bothered with cunts!I understand why you don't. It was embarrassing for you the first few times.