A question for JPP anti-Trump zealots

Thing1 said:
Yay! Someone gets it. Not surprising it isn't someone on the right.

Doesn't seem like too much to look for a little empathy for the reporters there - professionals who are just trying to do their job, without having thousands turn on them at the urging of a sitting President.
Click to expand...

All this says is that the press at Trump's rallies are snowflakes who can only dish it out.
 
Covfefe said:
It was enough to make the reporters present being in fear for their safety.
Click to expand...

According to them, of course.

Which you lapped up and proclaimed the Gospel truth.

Naturally you thought their alleged feelings were far more credible evidence than the complete absence of any reports of injuries.

I also noted that none of these supposedly terrified lions of the left abandoned their post, as a reasonable person would if they really thought a shrieking mob was going to offer them harm.

You're an idiot.
 
Right said:
All this says is that the press at Trump's rallies are snowflakes who can only dish it out.
Click to expand...

A total loser comment. Many of them have been women, and you're totally cool w/ a sitting President making their working atmosphere as hostile as possible, to the point where they feel outnumbered, surrounded and threatened.

What a man you are.
 
Thing1 said:
Holy shite - that was your point the whole time?

That's pretty hopeless, Darth. I keep hoping w/ you - but that's pretty hopeless.
Click to expand...


What a liar you are, O High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS).

If there was a threat of imminent bodily harm but no injuries to any media representative, you got nothing.

Unless you'd care to cite a poll or two? :rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
A total loser comment. Many of them have been women, and you're totally cool w/ a sitting President making their working atmosphere as hostile as possible, to the point where they feel outnumbered, surrounded and threatened.

What a man you are.
Click to expand...


That's our High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS). Feels over reals. Every time.

Oh, I feeeeeel so threatened.

Oh, Im a wooooooooomaaaaaaaan.

Please defend me, High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS). :rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
Hmmmm - a lot of this line of reasoning today.

So, if you haven't condemned or castigated something on JPP, you support it? Shall I start listing the things you apparently support?
Click to expand...

Now you aren't being fair to Cornholio. He patently admitted being a neoconfederate just the other day, (which is quite an odd feat for a Welshman.)
 
Thing1 said:
It has zero to do w/ free speech. Where did I say that Trump's words & the crowd's reaction should be illegal?

Can you point that out?
Click to expand...

I disagree- it has everything to do with Free Speech. The press enjoys special status because of the First Amendment, and they have consistently abused that privilege. The public responds to that abuse at Trump rallies. You have no problem with the former, yet champion against the latter.
 
Thing1 said:
Yay! Someone gets it. Not surprising it isn't someone on the right.

Doesn't seem like too much to look for a little empathy for the reporters there - professionals who are just trying to do their job, without having thousands turn on them at the urging of a sitting President.
Click to expand...


Professionals who bravely endured the terror they claimed to have felt and keep showing up at rallies, despite the horrible danger they supposedly were in?

Tell us more tales of these paragons of courage, High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS). :rofl2:
 
Thing1 said:
A total loser comment. Many of them have been women, and you're totally cool w/ a sitting President making their working atmosphere as hostile as possible, to the point where they feel outnumbered, surrounded and threatened.

What a man you are.
Click to expand...

LOL Are you proposing that women get treated differently now?
 
Right said:
LOL Are you proposing that women get treated differently now?
Click to expand...

Hey, I'm old school. I don't like to see anyone in that position, but definitely feel a little more protective of it when it's a woman. But no one who is just there to do their job should be singled out like that, and have to work in that kind of hostile environment. You're coming from a place of guilt by association, but most of those reporters work hard to get at the truth, and are just doing their jobs.

It's truly disgusting that you could support that kind of reaction against them, when they're so outnumbered in that situation. But that's what most of you guys are about. I'm glad I'm not that way.
 
Right said:
I disagree- it has everything to do with Free Speech. The press enjoys special status because of the First Amendment, and they have consistently abused that privilege. The public responds to that abuse at Trump rallies. You have no problem with the former, yet champion against the latter.
Click to expand...

Have you noticed that the crybabies have no police reports, no injuries, no credible evidence of anything beyond some hostile remarks directed at members of a famously hostile press?

Let's recap:

No reporter was assaulted

No reporter was injured

But the High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS) has elected to dis-remember the very real injuries (complete with police reports and arrests) dealt out to the press by Antifa.
 
Thing1 said:
Hey, I'm old school. I don't like to see anyone in that position, but definitely feel a little more protective of it when it's a woman. But no one who is just there to do their job should be singled out like that, and have to work in that kind of hostile environment. You're coming from a place of guilt by association, but most of those reporters work hard to get at the truth, and are just doing their jobs.

It's truly disgusting that you could support that kind of reaction against them, when they're so outnumbered in that situation. But that's what most of you guys are about. I'm glad I'm not that way.
Click to expand...


You are that way, High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS).

You must be aware that a female journalist was physically assaulted by leftists in Charlottesville, yet you seem disinclined to address that incident.

I think I know why.
 
Thing1 said:
Hey, I'm old school. I don't like to see anyone in that position, but definitely feel a little more protective of it when it's a woman. But no one who is just there to do their job should be singled out like that, and have to work in that kind of hostile environment. You're coming from a place of guilt by association, but most of those reporters work hard to get at the truth, and are just doing their jobs.

It's truly disgusting that you could support that kind of reaction against them, when they're so outnumbered in that situation. But that's what most of you guys are about. I'm glad I'm not that way.
Click to expand...

If I'm guilty of association with Trump supporters making abusive reporters uncomfortable then you need to be guilty of Antifa attacking veterans in wheelchairs. That's OK with me since I'm still at a much higher moral ground.
 
God bless America said:
Have you noticed that the crybabies have no police reports, no injuries, no credible evidence of anything beyond some hostile remarks directed at members of a famously hostile press?

Let's recap:

No reporter was assaulted

No reporter was injured

But the High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS) has elected to dis-remember the very real injuries (complete with police reports and arrests) dealt out to the press by Antifa.
Click to expand...

The Snowflake is melting because he feels that the other Snowflakes were melting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top