Something I don't understand, and no one has yet to explain it, what is the point

1) I dont give a shit about England and how they do it.
2) State Houses, Capitols, Government Property, the National Mall, Court Houses are all places of honor.

are museums paid for by tax payers in those same places also places of honor.

plus i bet you gave a shit about england and how they do it when you wanted Obamacare amirite?
 
lol

You mean he was investigated by Hoover. A racist fuck like you is quoting Malcolm X. Priceless!

The traitors in your precious statues fought a war against the United States of America and lost. We don't commemorate any other country that we defeated in war, do we?

Work on your grammar, illiterate.

Like the Indian Nations??
 
You mean the first true Americans that the white man tried to exterminate as they would vermin and then moved the survivors to the most desolate shitholes in the country? Those people?

Well, they did declare war against the US and then lost.
Are you changing your opinion and now think Memorials to losers should be kept?
 
Well, it's now gotten even more inane. :palm:

Pastor Wants Presidents’ Names Removed From Washington, Jackson Parks Over Ties To Slavery

A Chicago pastor has asked the Emanuel administration to remove the names of two presidents who owned slaves from parks on the South Side, saying the city should not honor slave owners in black communities.

A bronze statue of George Washington on horseback stands at the corner of 51st and King Drive, at the northwest entrance to Washington Park.

Bishop James Dukes, pastor of Liberation Christian Center, said he wants the statue gone, and he wants George Washington’s name removed from the park.

“When I see that, I see a person who fought for the liberties, and I see people that fought for the justice and freedom of white America, because at that moment, we were still chattel slavery, and was three-fifths of humans,” he said. “Some people out here ask me, say ‘Well, you know, he taught his slaves to read.’ That’s almost sad; the equivalent of someone who kidnaps you, that you gave them something to eat.”

Dukes said, even though Washington was the nation’s first president and led the American army in the Revolutionary War, he’s no hero to the black community.

“There’s no way plausible that we would even think that they would erect a Malcolm X statue in Mount Greenwood, Lincoln Park, or any of that. Not that say Malcolm X was a bad guy; they just would not go for it,” he said. “Native Americans would not even think about putting up a Custer statue, because of the atrocities that he plagued upon Native Americans. And for them to say to us ‘just accept it’ is actually insulting.”

“I think we should be able to identify and decide who we declare heroes in or communities, because we have to tell the stories to our children of who these persons are,” he said.
He said parks, statues, or other monuments honoring Presidents Washington and Jackson might be appropriate elsewhere, but not in black neighborhoods.

“In an African-American community, it’s a slap in the face and it’s a disgrace for them to honor someone who was a slave owner.

Dukes said he has sent letters to Mayor Rahm Emanuel and the Chicago Park District asking them to change the names of Washington and Jackson parks. He shared the letter on Facebook.

“I am feeling ambivalent that I would have to walk my child, attend a parade or enjoy a game of softball in a park that commemorates the memory of a slave owner,” he wrote. “Therefore, I call on the immediate removal of President George Washington and President Andrew Jackson names from the parks located on the southeast side of Chicago. They should not have the distinct honor of being held as heroes when they actively participated in the slave trade.”

Representatives for the mayor did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

A Chicago Park District spokeswoman pointed to the city’s formal process for renaming parks, which allows anyone to submit a request to the superintendent. The Park District board may vote on any such request after a 45-day public comment period.
 
there was no US to fight idiot


they fought for a life that had preexisted any US by thousands of years

Are you actually saying that Native Americans never waged war against the US; because you don't think the US was in existence at that time??

Is that what you're saying??

:facepalm:
 
You mean the first true Americans that the white man tried to exterminate as they would vermin and then moved the survivors to the most desolate shitholes in the country? Those people?

It's a thing of beauty!

I am having the best time watching JPP Righties stumble all over themselves trying to equate racist Southern ideology with native Americans.

Their repeated attempts to create similarities only serves to highlight just how ignorant they truly are.
 
To me, its not that the Confederates lost... its what they were fighting for.

a0278d6ebd9591c39e398b65ed9c5dd9d7d6ea7686578f1088d41908c6b92ca4.jpg
 
Are you actually saying that Native Americans never waged war against the US; because you don't think the US was in existence at that time??

Is that what you're saying??

:facepalm:

uh oh!

Looks like USF thinks he's caught desh in some sort of "gotcha" moment.

Expect to hear the same tired comment from USF numerous times over the next couple weeks as he attempts to drive his point home over and over again.
 
Back
Top