Charges sought against those who toppled Confederate statue

[USFREEDOM911]

I have been posting here for years and I have never seen you complain about these monuments until recently. But maybe you felt it internally and never expressed it? Doubt it

Or maybe it's just that they didn't feel "supported".

Sucks to be all alone.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Look for the ACLU to claim toppling statues is a form of free speech.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The Left are no slouches when it comes to making shit up, as this video shows it was the anti-fascist​s that started the violence.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/19685...olence-antifa-charlottesville-robert-kraychik

I posted the video, for those to lazy to click on the link.

I'd love for a JPP liberal to logically explain what happens at around the 22 second mark.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

They caught the bastard. A student in the state university system and proud member of some socialist party organization. Say goodbye to me subsidizing your education....

Did they perp walk him out of his safe place?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

here's one now

Is that PAT!!!!
<Saturday Night Live - for the clueless>

 

[USFREEDOM911]

those memorials on public property were put there legally by the duly elected representatives of the community

libs never seem to respect our elections do they?

Only when it conforms and fits their agenda(s).

 

[Русский агент]

Then explain this:

seems to me that several concentration camps are maintained as living museums and memorials to the people who died.

do libs think they should be torn down too?

 

[Airstrip One]

Many people think the south was right to secede. As i explained above, the civil war was NOT about slavery. The idea is preposterous.

You do realize i hope, that america was founded on secession. The original 13 colonies seceded from england. Do you oppose that.? THINK

I think the south has the right to secede; it just doesn't have the right to attack America without consequences.

 

[Airstrip One]

They should and hopefully will be prosecuted tot he furthest extent of the law

liberal loon has reached an all time high.
Anger mixed with whiney pantie wearing individuals is pretty funny

Hopefully they will be pardoned to the fullest extent of the law for being patriots.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

seems to me that several concentration camps are maintained as living museums and memorials to the people who died.

do libs think they should be torn down too?

Those are in other countries and they don't care about such.
You know like ISIS destroying things that are ancient.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I think the south has the right to secede; it just doesn't have the right to attack America without consequences.

Lincoln was very much aware that sending a supply ship to Fort Sumter would escalate the tension between the North and South.

Why did the South attack Fort Sumter?

Great efforts were made to avoid an armed conflict between the North and South. Politicians from both sides exerted efforts to resolve the conflicts between the North & the South. The problems were enormous and included :
A. Slavery;

B. Economic competition ; and

C. The divisive tariff issue.

South Carolina, in their view, had endured an affront to their sovereignty by "foreign" forces, meaning the Union army, on their soil since December 20, 1860 when the state seceded from the United States and then joined the Confederate States of America.

The Charleston harbor was an important one. In order to secure this Union fort for the South, the fort was bombarded with canon & mortar fire until it finally surrendered.

In summary, Fort Sumter had to be taken over by the South as one of many steps required to establish a new nation, the Confederacy.

 

[Airstrip One]

Lincoln was very much aware that sending a supply ship to Fort Sumter would escalate the tension between the North and South.

Why did the South attack Fort Sumter?

Great efforts were made to avoid an armed conflict between the North and South. Politicians from both sides exerted efforts to resolve the conflicts between the North & the South. The problems were enormous and included :
A. Slavery;

B. Economic competition ; and

C. The divisive tariff issue.

South Carolina, in their view, had endured an affront to their sovereignty by "foreign" forces, meaning the Union army, on their soil since December 20, 1860 when the state seceded from the United States and then joined the Confederate States of America.

The Charleston harbor was an important one. In order to secure this Union fort for the South, the fort was bombarded with canon & mortar fire until it finally surrendered.

In summary, Fort Sumter had to be taken over by the South as one of many steps required to establish a new nation, the Confederacy.

Supplies are very frightening things, I can tell you.

Fort Sumter was on American soil, and not on South Carolinian soil. When you secede, you can't take with you what does not rightfully belong to you.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Supplies are very frightening things, I can tell you.

Fort Sumter was on American soil, and not on South Carolinian soil. When you secede, you can't take with you what does not rightfully belong to you.

So the US just has the right to have troops and forts anywhere, without permission?

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Lincoln was very much aware that sending a supply ship to Fort Sumter would escalate the tension between the North and South.

Of course. Fort Sumter was on confederate land and the Union troops there were thus trespassing. Lincoln wanted a war. The South just wanted to leave.

 

[Airstrip One]

So the US just has the right to have troops and forts anywhere, without permission?

Especially when we have documentation stating that the fort or property in question does, indeed, belong to the US.

 

[Airstrip One]

Of course. Fort Sumter was on confederate land and the Union troops there were thus trespassing. Lincoln wanted a war. The South just wanted to leave.

The south started the war, unjustly, so, obviously the south really wanted a war.

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

I posted the video, for those to lazy to click on the link.

I'd love for a JPP liberal to logically explain what happens at around the 22 second mark.

The violence started in 1861 under that same shit rag confederate flag. The 22 second mark showed the latest response by American patriots to that racist and traitorous violence.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

About time they went after these rioters destroying public property. Abraham Lincoln was an admitted white supremacist too. Will these crazies destroy the Lincoln memorial next?

Busted: Police Cuff And Stuff Liberal Who Destroyed Durham Confederate Statue

The American history needs to be respected from every living American citizen. I said before and I am going to say again. Vandalism is not quite the thing we all need right now.

Not only the liberals are breaking this nation’s spirit, they also started breaking monuments and memorials. The newest historical memorial that has been vandalized was the Lincoln Memorial in DC.

Luckily the vandal who did it was caught, was a woman and left admirer as well.

Patriot Report says that a North Carolina Central University student was arrested Tuesday in connection with a Monday night protest in which a Confederate statue in front of Durham County’s former courthouse was pulled down.

Takiya Thompson used a ladder to scale the podium on which the Confederate Soldiers Monument stood, then climbed the statue and wrapped a strap around it so other protesters could pull it down.

Durham County Sheriff Mike Andrews said Tuesday that his deputies were working to identify others involved in the incident and plan to pursue felony charges against them.

The Sheriff stated during a press conference: “Let me be clear, no one is getting away with what happened. We will find the people responsible. “We can all agree yesterday went too far. Yesterday was not the Durham that I know.”

“Regardless of what this monument memorializes in our history, the destruction of this figure was unlawful, and it represented an inappropriate action,” he added. “There is a lawful way to gain the attention of our state to address the desire to move, remove or make substantive changes to a public monument.”

Patriot Report also reveals that some Durham residents said Tuesday they were appalled by the protesters’ actions, saying opposition to what the statue represents should have been handled differently.

Nobody has right to destroy our history. I hope this woman is on her way to prison and I also hope that all those who also took part in the destruction of public property will be brought to justice as well. Not a single person around here is above the law. So, all of you who did something like this or something worse, I hope you are watching and realizing that you are not getting away with your crimes.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Especially when we have documentation stating that the fort or property in question does, indeed, belong to the US.

Was in the US.
Once the south succeeded, it was no longer.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Was in the US.
Once the south succeeded, it was no longer.

I wonder what 3D thinks about the Alamo?