Mueller's investigation of Trump is going too far (CNN)

Granule said:
Explain how Mueller's grounds to investigate are just as strong, if not stronger, than Starr's grounds were for investigation.
Click to expand...

Dumb question.

Starr's investigation was completed and the report released two decades ago.

Mueller's investigation is still ongoing, so nobody knows what grounds or evidence he is working from.

Seems like that would be obvious to even a dumb shit Trumptard.
 
Nomad said:
Dumb question.

Starr's investigation was completed and the report released two decades ago.

Mueller's investigation is still ongoing, so nobody knows what grounds or evidence he is working from.

Seems like that would be obvious to even a dumb shit Trumptard.
Click to expand...
No, stupid. We're talking about GROUNDS for investigation, not the results. Explain how Mueller has as much as Starr did to even get started.
 
Granule said:
No, stupid. We're talking about GROUNDS for investigation, not the results. Explain how Mueller has as much as Starr did to even get started.
Click to expand...

Trump/Russia may be the most investigated 'possible crime' in US history. There are as many as nine[!] different Investigations including Mueller's.

It's insanity.
 
Nomad said:
Dumb question.

Starr's investigation was completed and the report released two decades ago.

Mueller's investigation is still ongoing, so nobody knows what grounds or evidence he is working from.

Seems like that would be obvious to even a dumb shit Trumptard.
Click to expand...

dumb answer, as usual.

Mueller has nothing, the Grand Jury is going to find just that.
Anyone that knows how a Grand Jury works knows they look at what Mueller hands them then decide if there is strong evidence to proceed, or is it legal flim flam.
Which it is, otherwise what Mueller handed the Grand Jury would be all over the front pages, secrets are a thing of the past
 
Getin the ring said:
dumb answer, as usual.

Mueller has nothing, the Grand Jury is going to find just that.
Anyone that knows how a Grand Jury works knows they look at what Mueller hands them then decide if there is strong evidence to proceed, or is it legal flim flam.
Which it is, otherwise what Mueller handed the Grand Jury would be all over the front pages, secrets are a thing of the past
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

In of itself, convening a grand jury can mean several different things. One of which, is this could be over quicker than people realize.

If I'm an anti-Trump zealot, the fact the other investigations either didn't come up with much and/or fail to implicate Trump, would be a little worrisome.

But I'm not an anti-Trump zealot.
 
Granule said:
No, stupid. We're talking about GROUNDS for investigation, not the results. Explain how Mueller has as much as Starr did to even get started.
Click to expand...

Gawd DAMN you are thick headed!!!! :whoa:

The GROUNDS for investigation are the EVIDENCE he's working off of and until the investigation is COMPLETED and his REPORT issued and made public, NOBODY OUTSIDE THE INVESTIGATION KNOWS WHAT HIS GROUNDS ARE.

You cannot be as fucking BRAINLESS as you seem to be!!!!! :palm:
 
Granule said:
Explain how Mueller's grounds to investigate are just as strong, if not stronger, than Starr's grounds were for investigation.
Click to expand...
it's a fishing expedition, especially now that we're obviously not finding "Russian collusion"
 
Getin the ring said:
dumb answer, as usual.

Mueller has nothing, the Grand Jury is going to find just that.
Anyone that knows how a Grand Jury works knows they look at what Mueller hands them then decide if there is strong evidence to proceed, or is it legal flim flam.
Which it is, otherwise what Mueller handed the Grand Jury would be all over the front pages, secrets are a thing of the past
Click to expand...

How the fuck does a ZERO LIKE YOU know what Mueller has or doesn't have????

You don't know your asshole from a pothole.
 
anatta said:
it's a fishing expedition, especially now that we're obviously not finding "Russian collusion"
Click to expand...

So Mueller's office is keeping you apprised of his progress now, eh? :palm:

Mueller to his assistant: "Get on the phone to annette!!! We need to give her our daily update, stat!!!!" :rofl2:

Doofus Trumptard.
 
Nomad said:
So Mueller's office is keeping you apprised of his progress now, eh? :palm:

Mueller to his assistant: "Get on the phone to annette!!! We need to give her our daily update, stat!!!!" :rofl2:

Doofus Trumptard.
Click to expand...
the hottest ticket in town would be for Russian collusion-
does this town (DC) keep anything confidential?..(no) do the math...he's wandering off for financials

Considering Russia is one giant oligarchy, he's bound to find some -but that's a far cry
from when you guys were sure there was collusion
 
anatta said:
the hottest ticket in town would be for Russian collusion-
does this town (DC) keep anything confidential?..(no) do the math...he's wandering off for financials

Considering Russia is one giant oligarchy, he's bound to find some -but that's a far cry
from when you guys were sure there was collusion
Click to expand...
I'll bet he finds evidence of a Russian Mafia. Who would have known?
 
anatta said:
the hottest ticket in town would be for Russian collusion-
does this town (DC) keep anything confidential?..(no) do the math...he's wandering off for financials

Considering Russia is one giant oligarchy, he's bound to find some -but that's a far cry
from when you guys were sure there was collusion
Click to expand...

How do you know he hasn't already found collusion which in turn, may have led him even deeper into the arena of financial crimes?

The truth is that you nor I nor anyone else outside Mueller's office knows what he's got so far.

You seem to be operating on the assumption that if he had found evidence of collusion, he'd just quit and come running like a pup with his report in his teeth like a dog bringing the paper.

He's going to go wherever and as far as the evidence leads him.
 
anatta said:
Matthew Whitaker is a CNN legal commentator and former US attorney who directs the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), a conservative ethics watchdog group. He ran in the Republican primary for Iowa Senate in 2014. The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

^author
Click to expand...

Cry harder shitstain
And your title is a lie!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top