Why we have a Russia investigation...

anatta said:
Crowdstrike used the XAgent malware as proof that it was unique to Fancy Bear.. it wasn't, and it relied on Ukrainian losses caused by XAgent (malware) as proof, but the loses came before the Donbass war.

Further it did all this analysis in 1 day? It's all built on a house of cards.
We know the DNC would not let the FBI examine the server.
Click to expand...
This character is just another Legion sock.
 
archives said:
Well, even with your rephrasing you still haven't offer any documentation that none of the intelligence entities didn't review or recheck the information provided and just accepted it at face value as valid
Click to expand...

????......how did they review or recheck it when they weren't given access?....
 
anatta said:
LOL..sure.. maybe I can get the Deep State to leak that classified info for you. :rolleyes:

Clapper gave an assessment based on Crowdstrikes analysis.
we know the FBI took Crowdstrikes analysis built on the steps in the article..

I postulate that the FBI ( remember Comey's "the Russians are coming to America" testimony)
saw what they wanted to see,and since the DNC would not let them examine the servers..there you go
Click to expand...

Now your back to your article as proof, the same article that explains you know it is all valid because of a $150,000 contract with the FBI, you might be better with your Deep State crapola, least it adds more drama
 
LuvTrump said:
So Comey's testimony proves that none of the intelligence entities didn't review or recheck the information provided and just automatically accepted it as valid?

Yes

If you want to offer some real documentation we'll wait

Don't need to prove a negative Legion. You know that
Click to expand...


BOOM
 
Last edited:
archives said:
Then it should be easy for you to show us some proof that "no intelligence agency in these United States used their resources and experience whatsoever.......and those agencies whose work centers did no checking or rechecking of any sources," any "everyone" isn't proof
Click to expand...

Prove a negative

Maybe you can provide evidence they did. I will wait
 
archives said:
So your saying that because "CrowdStrike currently has a $150,000 / year, no-bid contract with the FBI" it proves that the FBI didn't double check or reaffirm any of the data CrowdStrike came up with? By the way, $150,000 contract with any Gov't department is chump change

Do you have documentation that proves that none of the intelligence entities didn't review or recheck the information provided and just automatically accepted it as valid?
Click to expand...

Holy shit, you're as bad as the trumpers. The post laid out multiple reasons to question Crowdstrike and their conclusion. The default on proving things is that we don't have to prove the thing didn't happen in the absence of evidence that it did happen. We can assume the FBI didn't look at the server in absence of evidence that the FBI did look at the server. You want to have everyone accept your claim that they lookerd at it, you need to provide the evidence. That or you need to recognize that you have no idea.
 
The whole special counsel is a scam. In order for a special counsel to be appointed an underlying crime has to be a committed. Collusion which is what has been alleged is not a crime.

All the left keeps saying is that speaking to a Russian now means we investigate. It is ludicrous.

Mueller should be fired. The GOP will not impeach. The left will go nuts. They will base 2018 and 2020 all on impeaching and will lose.

It makes perfect political sense for Trump to fire Mueller. And don't even start with obstruction of justice bullshit. THERE IS NO CRIME.

What is happening here is like someone accusing you of saying hi to a drug dealer so now we have to audit your taxes, search your home and scour your phone records and emails. That is not how our justice system is supposed to work


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
lets bottom line this and all wait for the liberal response to the special counsel concluding this was all a nothing burger, that's going to be the fun part
 
Getin the ring said:
lets bottom line this and all wait for the liberal response to the special counsel concluding this was all a nothing burger, that's going to be the fun part
Click to expand...

So why did the Republicans appoint a special counsel? Why are the Republicans House and Republican Senate investigating?
 
Jarod said:
So why did the Republicans appoint a special counsel? Why are the Republicans House and Republican Senate investigating?
Click to expand...

basically to try and stop the whining. Democrats are acting like Children,
And one parent, Trump, says to let them cry themselves to sleep. the other parent, the republicans in congress are saying "give them a cookie" maybe they will stop crying.
so, as we see, no they won't stop crying, they'll just want another cookie when they're done with that one.
And eventually we will know we should have listened to the other parent, Trump.
you let children have their way and they won't learn anything, tough love. Sorry, no cookie, stop your whining.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top