The truth is that Socialist Progressive Democrats led us into every major U.S. war of the 20th century. And they call the repubs warmongers. Everything is upside down in lib lalaland.![]()
More dog shit.
Woodrow - WWI
FDR - WWII
Truman - Korean War
LBJ - Vietnam
More dogshit.
America's involvement in Vietnam began under Eisenhower.
Iraq invasion - GW Bush
Get your dogshit straight, dogshit.
Where is the liberal outrage?
America's involvement in Vietnam began under Truman. But it was LBJ's lie about the Gulf of Tonkin that marked the start of the war.
The Iraq war was NOT in the 20th century, moron.
NEXT
history teaches us that no amount of defense will stop an opponent if he really wants to hit you.
Your original statement referring to Democrats having "led us into every major war of the 20th century" was itself bullshit.
We weren't "led into" WWII. We were drawn into it after being attacked at Pearl Harbor while our European allies were being threatened with certain defeat and domination at the hands of the Nazis.
You should be worshipping at the feet of FDR for saving the world from Nazi and Axis domination so that today, you can sit on your fat pig ass and spew vomit over the internet.
Bigdogshit.


Funny how your bullshit right-wing propaganda didn't include pictures like these to illustrate "American Feminists"...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
But then again, nobody expects right-wingers to be honest about anything anyway.
Lying shitbag.
The truth is that Socialist Progressive Democrats led us into every major U.S. war of the 20th century. And they call the repubs warmongers. Everything is upside down in lib lalaland.![]()
Maybe those 40% trade tariffs that Douchebag Donald seemingly backed off of will finally be on the table?
Yes so you and the left like the military now. That's a laugh.
Chiba is reportedly cutting off the oil supply to NK, that in itself would cause them to collapse in months it not weeks. Banning coal exports and boycotting Chinese banks like the Bank of Dandong is yet another way to concentrate minds.So what, exactly, should previous administrations have done then?
Provoke a war with China? Because that's the endgame here.
Funnily enough, people in positions of power are, generally, quite reticent when it comes down to the issue of thermo-nuclear war.
The Chinese do nit want millions upon millions of refugees if north Korea collapses. That's their true motivation, it's hardly rocket science!I'm not partisan at all.
North Korea isn't Trump's fault at all. Admittedly, he's not been that great at handling the situation - ie the posturing and the empty threats. What he's going to find is the same thing that confronted previous administrations - the Chinese will only go so far in restraining NK, if they even can.
Bottom line is the Chinese prefer a nuclear armed North Korea than the Americans on their borders. They went to war last time to prevent this and they'll do it again.
There is no good outcome here.
You can blame Billy Bob for much of the mess.Oh, I have no doubt they were briefed, I just don't recall where they did much about it.
Bush II included them in the Axis of Evil but those are just words. Trump at least *seems* to have them on the front burner.
And they absolutely belong there.