New study confirms climate models suck

I have said for years all of the climate change hysteria is based on mathematical models which are prone to bias


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Covfefe said:
Ah, the usual suspects, lol

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/06/how-well-have-climate-models-done-in-the-upper-atmosphere/
Click to expand...

Ha, I have found it takes almost no effort to debunk the deniers, as you have so aptly shown.

"So in the end, the mismatch for these upper-air temperatures is real, but the reason for it is pretty nuts-and-bolts—and doesn’t change the amount of warming we expect to see as greenhouse gas emissions continue. As the researchers are careful to remind us, “Although scientific discussion about the cause of short-term differences between modeled and observed warming rates is likely to continue, this discussion does not cast doubt on the reality of long-term anthropogenic warming.”
Click to expand...

Also worth noting: deniers, who previously claimed global warming was a fraud, a hoax, perpetrated by a vast global conspiracy of scientists, are no longer even trying to make the flaccid claim that global warming is not real, and human GHGs emissions are not exacerbating it.

Onward to the next hilarious round of goal post moving!
 
Question for all the science believers. What do we need to do to our economy to combat it?
 
Last edited:
Global Warming Deniers Need not Read Any Further

Global Warming Deniers Need not Read Any Further

While jpp.com climate deniers have spent a career claiming that climate change is a hoax - whole message board careers spent downplaying and denying - Exxon, Shell, British Petroleum and prominent moderate Republicans indicate that immediate action is needed to mitigate human impacts to the climate....


Exxon, Shell, and BP support a Republican plan to do something about climate change
A carbon tax has long been touted as the free-market climate action path.

A group of major businesses, including Johnson & Johnson, General Motors, and fossil fuel giants ExxonMobil, BP, and Shell, announced Tuesday they have joined a Republican-led council that proposes to put a $40 tax on carbon emissions.

The companies, along with a list of high profile business people and two environmental groups, are part of the Climate Leadership Council, whose platform was written by former cabinet members James Baker and George Shultz.

Representatives from the council met with the White House in February, but there have been no signs from the administration that a carbon tax is on the table. To the contrary, President Trump has moved significantly away from climate action. His EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt, has rolled back a number of rules intended to limit greenhouse gas emissions, and the president himself announced that the United States would leave the historic Paris climate agreement, a 2015 pact to limit warming to less than 2°C (3.6°F).

In an op-ed in the Washington Post on Tuesday, former Secretary of State Schultz and former Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers, wrote that the United States needs to find another way.

“We do not believe the American people will for long wish to stand apart from the global effort to limit the damage from climate change,” they wrote.

continued
https://thinkprogress.org/businesses-call-for-climate-tax-815dd8d00a18
Click to expand...
 
cawacko said:
Cypress, you a supporter of the carbon tax?
Click to expand...

I am keeping an open mind to any legitimate climate solution, the important thing is to talk about it in an intelligent way and come up with viable mitigation strategies.

The last thing we need to be dealing with are the three D's: denial, downplay, and delay. Which has been the strategy for over two decades of the denial cabal.
 
Cypress said:
I am keeping an open mind to any legitimate climate solution, the important thing is to talk about it in an intelligent way and come up with viable mitigation strategies.

The last thing we need to be dealing with are the three D's: denial, downplay, and delay. Which has been the strategy for over two decades of the denial cabal.
Click to expand...

If you were put in a position of power to create legislation to deal with climate change what would be at the top of your list? (not asking in a snarky or gotcha question type way)
 
I guess Nature is now a denier site!
You warmers are fun to watch. You're still on your high horse despite all of your alarming prediction failing to materialize.
Keep fucking that chicken
 
You know why climate alarmists are so invested in their religion?
Because the mark never wants to admit they got conned.
 
tinfoil said:
I guess Nature is now a denier site!
You warmers are fun to watch. You're still on your high horse despite all of your alarming prediction failing to materialize.
Keep fucking that chicken
Click to expand...

Why should you have a voice? Seriously. Have you ever considered that stupid people should have a diminished voice? Wouldn't the world be a better place if dumb people listened and smart people talked? Wouldn't that increase the knowledge of humans? Is it less than pure evil to think or act otherwise. Please shut up, for goodness sakes.
 
Micawber said:
Why should you have a voice? Seriously. Have you ever considered that stupid people should have a diminished voice? Wouldn't the world be a better place if dumb people listened and smart people talked? Wouldn't that increase the knowledge of humans? Is it less than pure evil to think or act otherwise. Please shut up, for goodness sakes.
Click to expand...

:indeed:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top