Interesting how the Trump Administration shows little interest

Yaya said:
And, if true, did any of this actually stifle speech?
Click to expand...

What do you mean, "if true"? It's not up for debate, it happened.

Riddle me this dummy, why would trump hold a closed-door meeting with Russians, allow the Russian press to be present, but not the American press?
 
archives said:
in Russian interference into America's election process. Sixteen Intelligence agencies have confirmed the fact, the vast majority of everyone in Washington Republican and Democrat believe it is a fact and needs addressing for the future, yet the Trump team has been largely silent on the issue, Sessions even admitted he has never been briefed nor had any meetings about the problem.

The only movement Trump has made regarding questions over the last election was in one of his now infamous photo op executive orders to appoint a commission to study voter fraud, which included nothing to address any future Russian interference.

Why all the apathy over an issue most Americans and their leaders find troublesome?
Click to expand...

Well the DNC wasn't interested enough to let the FBI investigate their servers the Russians allegedly hacked and Comey wasn't interested enough to push the issue. And you aren't interested enough to be curious about the FBI never looking at the DNC servers supposedly at the heart of this alleged interference.

So yeah, color me skeptical
 
GazzaQueef said:
I know the POTUS has said he supports the investigation.
Click to expand...

200.gif
 
Sessions claims he was never briefed on the Russian hacking attack and he never asked anyone in his department about it.
Some may say that he was recused from anything to do with the Russian hacking attack but there was a period of about two and a half weeks where the intell was out and he was not yet recused.
Why would the AG not even be curious about an attack on our nation and our system of electing?
He knew every detail because he was in collusion ...That's why.
Fucking traitor.
 
christiefan915 said:
I doubt it.

Responding to news reports that Robert Mueller, the special counsel in the Russia investigation, is now investigating him for possible obstruction of justice, Trump wrote, “They made up a phony collusion with the Russians story, found zero proof, so now they go for obstruction of justice on the phony story. Nice.”

About an hour later, he posted another message: “You are witnessing the single greatest WITCH HUNT in American political history - led by some very bad and conflicted people! #MAGA”

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-...residential-sideand-then-went-back-to-ranting
Click to expand...

The bit about Trump being investigated for 'possibly obstructing justice' is from anonymous sources. So the media headline should read 'Trump is possibly being finally investigated for possible obstruction of justice'.

But journalistic integrity is gone with the wind.

Trump's Tweet happens to be true. This is not watergate, it's a witch hunt---aided by a segment of the media and I gave you evidence of it in the first paragraph.
 
Darth Omar said:
The bit about Trump being investigated for 'possibly obstructing justice' is from anonymous sources. So the media headline should read 'Trump is possibly being finally investigated for possible obstruction of justice'.

But journalistic integrity is gone with the wind.

Trump's Tweet happens to be true. This is not watergate, it's a witch hunt---aided by a segment of the media and I gave you evidence of it in the first paragraph.
Click to expand...

Show us your proof that ANY investigation of Trump, his campaign or his associates is a "witch hunt".

Show us your proof that, just because we don't know whether or not the investigators have credible evidence of possible misdeeds, that means they do not have such evidence.

Oh wait, you don't have any proof and you don't know what evidence they have or don't have.

So your use of the term "witch hunt" is just more of the usual Trumptard hyperbole.

Got it.
 
Nomad said:
Show us your proof that ANY investigation of Trump, his campaign or his associates is a "witch hunt".

Show us your proof that, just because we don't know whether or not the investigators have credible evidence of possible misdeeds, that means they do not have such evidence.

Oh wait, you don't have any proof and you don't know what evidence they have or don't have.

So your use of the term "witch hunt" is just more of the usual Trumptard hyperbole.

Got it.
Click to expand...

This is rich lol.

How about you show some proof Trump colluded with Russians. You've been going on about it for months now.
 
Darth Omar said:
This is rich lol.

How about you show some proof Trump colluded with Russians. You've been going on about it for months now.
Click to expand...

I've stated my BELIEF that Trump and/or his campaign colluded with the Russians.

You stated that.... "This is not watergate, it's a witch hunt---aided by a segment of the media...." as if it were a verified fact.

There is no obligation to provide proof for a belief, but there is an obligation to provide proof for a statement of supposed fact.

So, where's your proof?
 
Nomad said:
I've stated my BELIEF that Trump and/or his campaign colluded with the Russians.

You stated that.... "This is not watergate, it's a witch hunt---aided by a segment of the media...." as if it were a verified fact.

There is no obligation to provide proof for a belief, but there is an obligation to provide proof for a statement of supposed fact.

So, where's your proof?
Click to expand...

Since you have no proof [or even the first shred of evidence] of collusion my belief is this isn't Watergate lol?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top