Darth Omar
Russian asset
Why does it matter what people think on this topic?
There is not a person on this board that has not prayed to God at least once. And I guarantee you will again at some point in your life.
Delicious irony here, especially since you took time to think about it a second time and edited it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agnostic
I did. I was probably 11 or 12. Then I acquired better cognitive skills.
Don't put any money on your guarantee.
Delicious irony here, especially since you took time to think about it a second time and edited it.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agnostic
He had a very good message. It's just that his messengers, many of whom I see on this forum, are the shitbags messing it up.
looks like BucKKKle mis-spelled antagonistic again.......
He created the world "in the beginning". Our finite minds can not grasp infinity. If you truly want to understand anything about God, "you must come to him in faith, believing he is." It's God's business when the beginning was. Yet, by faith we know he was, he is and always will be. Hence his Biblical name of 'I AM'.
God said, "I change not."
LOL..
So it doesn't say in the good book that tho shall cuss, be cruel, slander & troll thy neighbors?
James 4:17 “Therefore, to him who knows to do good and does not do it, to him it is sin.”
I did. I was probably 11 or 12. Then I acquired better cognitive skills.
Don't put any money on your guarantee.
Why does it matter what people think on this topic?
The Hindu concept of God is actually far more impressive than the Abrahamic Biblical god, who failed to defeat men with iron chariots.
The edit was to add your own ignorance to Tucker's, FRight...
The etymology of agnostic literally means, not having knowledge...same as ignorance.
ag·nos·tic
Origin
mid 19th century: from a-1 ‘not’ + gnostic.
gnos·tic
ˈnästik/Submit
adjective
1.
relating to knowledge, especially esoteric mystical knowledge.
noun
ig·no·rance
ˈiɡnərəns/Submit
noun
lack of knowledge or information.
"he acted in ignorance of basic procedures"
synonyms: incomprehension of, unawareness of, unconsciousness of, unfamiliarity with, inexperience with, lack of knowledge about, lack of information about
Fits you and Tucker to a fucking tee.
so what exactly did the Hindu god defeat?......
so what exactly did the Hindu god defeat?......
I don't see a link there lol
Routine Buckky fail. That's why you should stick to the race card. lol
so what exactly did the Hindu god defeat?......
Brahman or the Supreme Self is beyond time and space, causation. He is limitless. He is tranquil. He shines with equal effulgence in all bodies. He cannot be any particular thing. He is chaitanya or pure consciousness. He is the jewel of jewels. He is the imperishable, inexhaustible supreme wealth, which no dacoit can rob.
A supreme principle exists. It is Atman. It is Para Brahman. It is imperishable, unborn, undecaying and undying. It is ancient. It is one. It is a mass of wisdom and bliss. It has neither name nor form. It has neither contraction nor expansion, neither beauty nor ugliness. Brahman is surrounded by an ocean of mind, an ocean of prana, vital force, and an ocean of ether and tanmatras, essence of the elements and senses. That unheard hearer, that unseen seer, that unthought thinker, that unknown knower is Brahman. That from which this world has come out, that in which this world exists, that in which it gets dissolved is Brahman.
Brahman or Atman or the Supreme Self is self-luminous. Brahman cannot be manifested by anything else. Brahman manifests everything. The doctrine of self-luminosity is one of the foundational tenets on which the entire edifice of Vedanta is constructed. Atman gives light to the sun, the moon, the stars, the lightning, the fire, the intellect and the senses. By the light of Atman all these shine but they cannot illumine Atman.
Brahman alone is the Infinite. There cannot be two infinities. If there were two infinities, there will be a conflict among the infinities themselves. One Infinite will be creating something, another Infinite will be destroying something. There can be only one Infinite. This Atman is the one Infinite Brahman. Everything else is its manifestation or expression.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Agn...rceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=etymology+of+agnostic
https://www.google.com/search?q=ign...e.&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.google.com/search?q=Agn...ome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=gnostic
Straight Google, FRight ...
No slight of hand...
Straight dictionary and etymology stuff...
But as I said you don't "Know anything"...
LMFAO
Your lack of a link was only your first, small, mistake. Your big mistake was not understanding that the author gets to decide what definition of a word he chooses, not the reader. lol
Again, stick to playing the race card. It's so easy even you can do it. lol
This involves breaking down Brahman into component gods (or divas). The Trimurti in Hinduism involves Brahma (Creator), Vishnu (Preserver) and Shiva (Destroyer). These beings are all infinitely powerful. Shiva alone can break the cosmos with his footsteps, and actually destroys the universe in order to complete a cycle (measured in trillions of years). These beings and all of reality combined are called Brahman (not to be confused with Brahma), which has the following description: