Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

GazzaQueen said:
Direct us to this explanation.

You won't, of course. :)
Click to expand...

Anti-particles began turning into particles, since they were ever-so-slightly more efficient. By the time the Higgs field returned to its normal strength — a phenomenon called “relaxation” — there were marginally more particles than anti-particles. The anti-particles annihilated what they could, but a few particles remained — the origin of all matter that has existed since.
Click to expand...

*honk*
 
If you require a first cause, you do not understand cause and effect. Creationists require a first cause. Creationists are all idiots. There is nothing more to say about that. A Big Bang is not a first cause, it is the first cause we know existed.

Anyone who continues talking to a creationist about ultimate reality is either stupid himself, or is entertained by tormenting idiots.
 
Thing1 said:
No one knows - not even Einstein did.
Click to expand...

True, science doesn't deal with absolutes, but there are certainly theories that are mathematically accurate. Since physics breaks down at the point of a singularity, there are some things that cannot be verified and will never be verified.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Theorizing how it happened certainly does not address Who created these particles, nor does it address how these particles (original matter) came to be in the first place. :)
Click to expand...

Ahhh... we call this moving the goal post. It's true that you can keep moving those goal posts until science breaks down, but that doesn't mean religions wins by default. Religion moves according to science, the reverse is NEVER true. We went from an Earth-centric universe to one that you are arguing with me about (dealing with quantum physics). Religion is not only a movable object, it is easily moved. Science will always be a better method of explaining natural phenomena, and God himself gets pushed back by the understanding of man.

Sorry, those are the breaks.
 
science admits it does not know EVERYTHING


cons see that as weakness


they pretend to know everything because they are fucked in the head
 
Amadeus said:
Incorrect. Science is a methodology of studying natural phenomena, experimentation, and accumulating of data to provide theories and answers as to how the natural world operates. It involves being able to replicate results from experimentation.
Click to expand...
absolutely.....which is why your link does not qualify as science......
 
evince said:
science admits it does not know EVERYTHING


cons see that as weakness


they pretend to know everything because they are fucked in the head
Click to expand...

science is our VERY BEST INFORMATION AT THE TIME


anyone who demeans science to protect their religion is an asshole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top