Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

PostmodernProphet said:
God is equal or better than your link to a "scientific" explanation that MAY (according to several atheist scientists) eventually be proven if there is ever any proof which so far there isn't.......see?......equal......
Click to expand...

Incorrect. Science is a methodology of studying natural phenomena, experimentation, and accumulating of data to provide theories and answers as to how the natural world operates. It involves being able to replicate results from experimentation.

God is simply magic by another name, whereby the natural order is suspended and miracles occur which cannot be observed or replicated using the scientific method.

A scientist might provide a 100 page explanation, whereas you or GazzaQueen would simply say 'God did it'. I can see why the simplicity appeals to you, but its not serious answer or explanation -- and trying to poke holes in scientific theories is kind of sad coming from people who think that casting spells is a viable alternative explanation.
 
Amadeus said:
Incorrect. Science is a methodology of studying natural phenomena, experimentation, and accumulating of data to provide theories and answers as to how the natural world operates. It involves being able to replicate results from experimentation.

God is simply magic by another name, whereby the natural order is suspended and miracles occur which cannot be observed or replicated using the scientific method.

A scientist might provide a 100 page explanation, whereas you or GazzaQueen would simply say 'God did it'. I can see why the simplicity appeals to you, but its not serious answer or explanation -- and trying to poke holes in scientific theories is kind of sad coming from people who think that casting spells is a viable alternative explanation.
Click to expand...

Give us one explanation, according to science.
 
GazzaQueen said:
I know the answer.
Click to expand...

Which is? If you can't answer this question, you have no authority or high ground to call for an explanation from me. Lets see what your next response is. I'm guessing it will be some variation of "Nah nah I asked you first!"
 
Amadeus said:
Which is? If you can't answer this question, you have no authority or high ground to call for an explanation from me. Lets see what your next response is. I'm guessing it will be some variation of "Nah nah I asked you first!"
Click to expand...

First you must admit you have no answers.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Apostle Paul/Christopher Hitchens........Irenaeus of Lyons/Christopher Hitchens........St Francis of Assissi/Christopher Hitchens......Jesus/Christopher Hitchens.......so hard to choose, so hard to choose.......
Click to expand...
Paul was not an Apostle, he was a disciple. A true scholar of the Gospels would know this.
 
Right said:
I don't believe that you've read this article, because it doesn't answer the question that you think it does. lol
Click to expand...

What do you think the article says? Please, please, please say what I think you're alluding to. It would effectively run you off the board in disgrace.
 
Amadeus said:
What do you think the article says? Please, please, please say what I think you're alluding to. It would effectively run you off the board in disgrace.
Click to expand...

I'm "alluding" to the fact that the article doesn't say what you claim it says lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top