DNC property is not government property.
Why does that make a difference? In fact one could make an argument that the people are more entitled to government property than private property.
DNC property is not government property.
When something is classified for no good reason its abuse of the law and only an attempt to keep the people uninformed.
Why does that make a difference? In fact one could make an argument that the people are more entitled to government property than private property.
How did you feal about the the leaking of the HRC emails?
As I have said before hypocrisy abounds. When it was Hillary be slammed by leaks, those of us on the right loved it while your side bemoaned and wanted to focus solely on the leaks and not the content. Now it is the other way around. Unlike you, I recognize the difference.
However, I will draw a distinction between Podesta's personal emails and someone leaking information about private meetings with foreign leaders. That should be unacceptable under any administration. But, I fear we find ourselves in a society where once this kind of news breaks we all hunker down in our own political corners and duke it out form partisan standpoints hypocrisy be damned.
I am guilty of it myself, however unlike you, I recognize my flaws
I was never against the leaks. I was glad to have as much information as possible.
yep. the leaking is an abomination. It's destroying the POTUS ability to set foreign policy-
it's anti-Constitutional as well as illegal
Sounds like we need an congressional investigation.
Liberals aren't seeing the downside to this. It isn't like the next democrat in the WH will be immune from leaks and leakers. Granted, the next democrat will have the media running interference for them, but it will still leave its mark.
What goes around comes around.
that your trumpy is toast
You guys couldn't wait to post every round of WikiLeaks that came out during the campaign. And Trump ate it up w/ a spoon.
So, yeah - that last line of your post is appropriate.
Sounds like we need an congressional investigation.
Liberals aren't seeing the downside to this. It isn't like the next democrat in the WH will be immune from leaks and leakers. Granted, the next democrat will have the media running interference for them, but it will still leave its mark.
What goes around comes around.
What is funny is that I always here that Comey isn't a political operative. Well, he wouldn't have lasted in DC as long as he has without being an operative. But it obviously shows the naked partisanship of the anti trumpers that they aren't asking why Comey is giving that memo to associates.
Let's say for the sake of argument that Comey was trying to build a case against Trump, couldn't how he did it be seen as entrapment?
Also, wouldn't his memo be considered evidence? If it was, then wouldn't he be complicit in mishandling evidence in an ongoing investigation.
Again, I realize that people like BACasshole, GayRod and Deshtard are blinded by their Trump hatred
I would hope neither the Democrats nor the republicans would ever put another loose cannon in the WH. Everybody should learn a lesson from the current debacle lol.
If Comey is orchestrating the leaks (it is his government-owned property that is being leaked, after all), that makes Comey a felon.
.Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
though they did not tell us anything important
why would Comey leak it.......all he would have to do is hold a press conference and state it........
I don't think there are ANY intelligence officials.......I think its all DNC.......Yet that's not what happened. Someone leaked classified information that Comey was responsible for.
Do you think Comey is the "former intelligence official?"
I don't think there are ANY intelligence officials.......I think its all DNC.......