Yes, and there is more than a scintilla of difference between dominates and mere signal. Yes they can say it, and they did, and they are climate scientists published in a high impact scholarly journal concerning the very subject at hand, whereas you appear to be a street corner mumbler in dire need of gobbling a fistful of haloperidol.
New study in Nature shows pause is real
- Thread starter cancel2 2022
- Start date
Yes, and there is more than a scintilla of difference between dominates and mere signal. Yes they can say it, and they did, and they are climate scientists published in a high impact scholarly journal concerning the very subject at hand, whereas you appear to be a street corner mumbler in dire need of gobbling a fistful of haloperidol.
Nicely put.
To recap the thread, Tom presented are Article by nature as an authoritative source, that once the actual article was posted it actually completely debunked and undermined the deniers - namely, that global warming is primarily being driven by human green house emissions.
That has to be one of the most classic cases of being owned and debunked by one's own source in the history of this board.
Secondly, a the opinions bunch of anonymous message boarders who have no training, no expertise, and have done no original research on the topic of climate science, is irrelevant. Their opinions are not worth more than a bucket of warm piss. Do any of us place much weight on the opinion of bus driver on marine navigation? Nope, of course we don't!
Last edited:
I'm well aware of sailor's complete lack of climate science and admiralty knowledge. I am also aware that the last two years were the warming record, so paused or not, warning has unpaused.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Even if you weren't twelve, I doubt you could go to sleep without thinking about the people you flame online.
If you can't stand criticism of your "scientific" dishonesty, then you can just have a big cup of shut the fuck up.
It also shows that for any instance in which scientists through their searching inquiry make any statements susceptible to misconstruction in any way favorable to Republican viewpoints, Republicans will do it, thereby punishing scientists for dignifying or addressing their politically driven concerns in a professional way.
If you want a seat at the big boy table, I suggest not picking your nose and wiping it on your plate before the first course is even plated.
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
God you are truly an effing moron, you won't address the fact that the pause was real as cited in the Nature study, not imagined as some tried to say. So instead you latch onto something else instead and then continue the bullshit with a hack article from the NYT. I have your number now though, you're just another vapid poseur with nothing to say.
Even NOAA states that sea levels are rising at a leisurely 1.8 mm per year or 18 cm (7 in) per century!! That is a statement from a definitive source but you ignore that because it makes you look stupid and ignorant preferring instead to post bullshit from the NYT. I can think of absolutely no reason to take you seriously, it is self evident that you allow politics to override any pretence you may have to follow the scientific method. Man we should all be shitting ourselves over that according to ignorant twats like you and McAwful.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Due entirely to El Nino as in 1998. Temperatures have now fallen 0.6C since last year and it is true to say that they haven't risen since 1998. I am also entirely aware of your complete lack of scientific training in climate related subjects as well but that seemingly doesn't prevent you from spouting premium grade bullshit on here. You even wheeled out that famous world renowned authority on climate David Aaronovitch, the left wing TV pundit, just because you saw him in a Wiki article. To my mind that completely destroyed any credibility you think that you have, stick to chasing ambulances.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You are an obnoxious cretin, that's what I can't stand.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Holy fuck you dishonest cunt, a signal can be anything from weak to strong. The jury is still well and truly out on exactly how much of an effect CO2 has on climate forcing, only an ignorant peasant would think otherwise.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Tom...fighting the good fight.
Your own article, the one you presented presumably because you thought is had such weight and authority coming from a respected journal, says that confidence is higher than ever that humans are the dominant cause of global warming.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ure-shows-pause-is-real&p=1897715#post1897715
Unless you are going to disown and disavow your own article, the case of the climate denier has just simply become weak, and comical.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
I was talking about the pause you dishonest cunt. You plainly couldn't see any way to dispute that so you attempted to try another tack. Why did you come back here anyway? The last time I heard of you was when you were run off for sexual harassment!!
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
False, the past two years are the warmest ever recorded.
And your article's article dated in 2017 certainly wasn't a current event or new. It was predated by several, including :https://www.nature.com/articles/ncl...2usaF1XpSyPg&tracking_referrer=www.nature.com
It is good that the debate over a hiatus is actually taking place within the real scientific community and ignoring the bleating nonsense from climate deniers with zero grounding in the field, like you.
Yes a signal can be weak to strong, but dominant can ONLY be dominant. You chose "signal" science's article with dozens of actual climate scientists said "dominant." Does all your lying weigh on your conscience?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yeh by one hundredth of a degree, well outside the margin of error and even then only with terrestrial based sensors. Temperatures has now dropped back over 0.6C proving that the rise was wholly due to El Nino and natural variability. Don't bother posting anymore, I haven't the patienece to deal with ignorant cunts like you and Spruce Goose the sexual harasser.
Are you confusing weather with climate?
I'm sorry did you say something? Was it dismissive? That's OK, you aren't a climate scientist. You don't matter. Was it backed up with peer reviewed scholarship? No. Climate scientists have not dismissed the last two years, the warmest ever recorded.