What kind of idiot brings a BABY STROLLER into the passenger section of an airliner?

I flew to Atlanta and back this weekend with baby and each time we checked our stroller at the end of the walk way before boarding the plane and they brought it to us right as we landed. Not sure why someone would bring it on to the plane.
 
I flew to Atlanta and back this weekend with baby and each time we checked our stroller at the end of the walk way before boarding the plane and they brought it to us right as we landed. Not sure why someone would bring it on to the plane.

There is zero need. Rune is a dumbass
 
I flew to Atlanta and back this weekend with baby and each time we checked our stroller at the end of the walk way before boarding the plane and they brought it to us right as we landed. Not sure why someone would bring it on to the plane.

All I remember is any kid two and under fit nicely into the overhead compartment...
 
Re this latest American Airlines customer flap. The brainless bimbo might as well have tried to bring an upright piano with her. The flight attendants were right to stop her.

And then the brainless bimbo stands there crying like women always do in a crisis while they wait for a man to step in and help them!!! That guy who threatened the attendant should be prosecuted.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/22/us/american-airlines-video-confrontation-trnd/

People who want their babies to fly in style.
 
Incorrect.
He didn't ask nicely and patiently as is required by airline policy.
He wrenched it from her grasp, injuring her and almost the baby as well.
Figures you would also attack the Gentleman who attempted to help the injured lady.

Furthermore, you are incorrect, see the post by Stretch above.

Idiot.

This is part of the problem.
Way too many people are willing to just stand by and say nothing when things like this happen.

Example:
Years ago my wife and I had gone to a midnight movie.
While standing in line, there were a couple of 20 year olds in front of us.
The conversation they were having was sprinkled with some language that I don't use around my wife or women in general.
After listening to them, for some time, I finally asked them to knock it off.
All of sudden other people in line, started saying things like "Thanks", "It's about time", etc.
I looked around and asked them how come they didn't say something, instead of waiting for someone else.
Very awkward silence, until the doors to the movie opened.
 
Nope. They always get gate checked dickiess wonder. She has ZERO need for a stroller folding or otherwise on an airplane. It goes under the plane and is brought up when the plane lands. She doesn't have to go to baggage claim to pick it up. I realize that poor people like you don't realize how this works, but I do

UH, then how did she get it on the plane?
 
UH, then how did she get it on the plane?

she wasn't following directions?

just didn't know?

overwhelmed traveling with two young children?

Any number of reasons. Bottom line, umbrella strollers get gate checked.

But, one good thing about this thread is you and Rune are buddies and agree on something.

I suspect that if either of you and Rune got on a plane and couldn't put your carry on luggage up top because there was an umbrella stroller taking up space you would have a shit fit.

THERE WAS ZERO NEED FOR HER TO HAVE HER UMBRELLA STROLLER ONBOARD THE PLANE. SHE OVERREACTED AS WOMEN ARE WONT TO DO
 
I know right?? where did you expect to stow that stroller?

She was gonna leave it in the aisle where someone would trip and break a leg or stow it overhead where it would fall down and brain somebody. Either way the airline gets sued for millions. AA was right to take it from her.
 
I flew to Atlanta and back this weekend with baby and each time we checked our stroller at the end of the walk way before boarding the plane and they brought it to us right as we landed. Not sure why someone would bring it on to the plane.

She's a brainless bimbo and figured if anyone challenged her, all she has to do is shout SEXISM.
 
she wasn't following directions?

just didn't know?

overwhelmed traveling with two young children?

Any number of reasons. Bottom line, umbrella strollers get gate checked.

But, one good thing about this thread is you and Rune are buddies and agree on something.

I suspect that if either of you and Rune got on a plane and couldn't put your carry on luggage up top because there was an umbrella stroller taking up space you would have a shit fit.

THERE WAS ZERO NEED FOR HER TO HAVE HER UMBRELLA STROLLER ONBOARD THE PLANE. SHE OVERREACTED AS WOMEN ARE WONT TO DO

Are you trying to say that the 'gate', for this particular airline, was right at the planes door??
 
She was gonna leave it in the aisle where someone would trip and break a leg or stow it overhead where it would fall down and brain somebody. Either way the airline gets sued for millions. AA was right to take it from her.

OH, PLEASE.
Show anything that would verify that she was gonna leave it in the aisle where someone would trip and break a leg or stow it overhead where it would fall down and brain somebody.

Are you aware that the overhead storage doors are latched closed?
 
The media cartels are treating this incident like that doctor that got beat up by United. That was entirely different. The doc had paid for his ticket and done nothing wrong and they attacked him!! Here the passenger was clearly at fault for bringing the damn stroller.
 
OH, PLEASE.
Show anything that would verify that she was gonna leave it in the aisle where someone would trip and break a leg or stow it overhead where it would fall down and brain somebody.

Are you aware that the overhead storage doors are latched closed?

I don't know if these particular storage doors were latchable or not but who cares? Half the people don't use the latches anyway. THINK
 
uranidiot. All the problems in the world would vanish overnight if people would just MYOFB.

YEAH; like they did in NEW YORK, in 1964, where that woman was being raped and then murdered while the pedestrians just kept walking past.

March 13, 1964 | New York Woman Killed While Witnesses Do Nothing

On March 13, 1964, a 28-year-old woman named Catherine “Kitty” Genovese was raped and killed in two separate late-night attacks near her home in Kew Gardens, Queens. Police found that at least 38 people had seen the attacks or heard Genovese scream, but no one intervened and just one woman called the police.

The story was barely reported until two weeks later, when Martin Gansberg covered it in vivid detail in The New York Times: “For more than half an hour 38 respectable, law-abiding citizens in Queens watched a killer stalk and stab a woman in three separate attacks in Kew Gardens,” Gansberg wrote. “Twice their chatter and the sudden glow of their bedroom lights interrupted him and frightened him off. Each time he returned, sought her out, and stabbed her again. Not one person telephoned the police during the assault; one witness called after the woman was dead.”

Gansberg detailed why some of the witnesses hadn’t acted. One said that he “didn’t want to get involved,” while another said, “without emotion,” according to Gansberg, “I was tired. I went back to bed.”

The article ignited outrage against the 38 residents. Pundits proclaimed that it was an example of society’s moral decay; on the 40th anniversary of the attack, Jim Rasenberger wrote in The Times that “the case quickly expanded into an all-consuming metaphor for the ills of contemporary urban life.” Psychologists coined the term “Genovese syndrome” to explain why people are less likely to act in an emergency if others are present.

The Kitty Genovese episode became infamous, but later examination found that Gansberg had exaggerated details and presented a misleading perspective of the witnesses’ actions. All but one of the witnesses likely saw or heard only the first attack, after which Genovese walked away, giving the impression that she was all right. The second attack took place out of view of most people. Only one man saw the attack. He told another woman to call the police, but it was too late to save Genovese.

The witnesses, wrote Rasenberger, “reacted as they reportedly did not because they were apathetic or cold-hearted, but because they were confused, uncertain and afraid.”

Connect to Today:

In April 2010, a homeless man named Hugo Alfredo Tale-Yax died on a street in Queens after being stabbed while intervening in an argument. A number of people walked by him as he lay dying on the street. The New York Times reported, “One man bent down to the sidewalk to shake the man, lifting him to reveal a pool of blood before walking away. Two men appeared to have a conversation about the situation, one pausing to take a photo of the body before departing. But the rest merely turned their heads toward the body, revealing some curiosity as they hurried along.” The article also noted that, “in New York, as in most other states, there is no legal obligation for a bystander to help someone in distress.”

In your opinion, what causes people to turn a blind eye when they see others in danger? Does the indifference of passers-by say something about society in general? Do you think cases such as the death of Mr. Tale-Yax support the premise of Genovese syndrome — that a large group of people in the area creates a diffusion of responsibility that results in inaction? Why or why not?
 
Back
Top