Just reported on ABC News... Brit Intel picked up conversations...

Nomad

Every trumper is a N4T.
...Between Russian agents and top level Trump campaign officials in 2015, early in the campaign.

Staaaayyyyyyyyyyyy........ Tuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnned folks!!!!!! :awesome:
 
...Between Russian agents and top level Trump campaign officials in 2015, early in the campaign.

Staaaayyyyyyyyyyyy........ Tuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnned folks!!!!!! :awesome:
Why do you think trump is bragging about how terrible Russian/U.S.A relations are now, after bashing Obama for creating 'bad/sad' relations?

He thinks we forgot about the investigations. If he creates a war with Korea, this all goes away.


Stay tuned.
 
You are so anxious to protect Trump you don't think.

What's to protect lol? All I've seen is speculation. Give me something concrete *then* I will decide if I want to defend him.

You guys fall for every little Russian conspiracy dribble that comes out of the media. Kind of pathetic, actually.
 
It IS troubling, stand alone. I don't want any campaigns acting in the capacity of a campaign having private meetings with any foreign governments, or even foreign business interests for that matter. Why would I want that?
 
What's to protect lol? All I've seen is speculation. Give me something concrete *then* I will decide if I want to defend him.

You guys fall for every little Russian conspiracy dribble that comes out of the media. Kind of pathetic, actually.

You already are, by being here and grabbing that laboring oar. You show up here to undermine the legitimacy of information, that if coupled with other information, is a crime. I don't blame you for that, being the tribal loyalist you evidently are. You should. Otherwise we wouldn't be talking so amiably about this, now would we? I've already said, stand alone it's not good. Not a crime, but I don't want ANY campaign having private meetings that they LIED ABOUT HAVING AT ALL, with Russian.

So stay here and babble and prove me right with every keystroke.
 
It IS troubling, stand alone. I don't want any campaigns acting in the capacity of a campaign having private meetings with any foreign governments, or even foreign business interests for that matter. Why would I want that?

Depends what they're meeting about. You understand we aren't at war with Russia so the mere fact people [even campaign people] talk to them is meaningless, right? Flynn met with them and nothing illegal happened---according to the FBI.

If you were able to be objective about it, you'd see that as a strike against the theory, because there *should have* been something there and there wasn't.
 
So.....after all the whining and crying by lefty pinheads, Judge Napolitano Sticking To Claim Obama Used Brits To Spy On Donald Trump and it turns out.....he's right.....
 
What's to protect lol? All I've seen is speculation. Give me something concrete *then* I will decide if I want to defend him.

You guys fall for every little Russian conspiracy dribble that comes out of the media. Kind of pathetic, actually.
'All you've seen'? trump lost Nunes as a first line of defense. The White House has been trying to quell any investigations, using myriad KGB tactics.

It ain't gonna work.
 
So.....after all the whining and crying by lefty pinheads, Judge Napolitano Sticking To Claim Obama Used Brits To Spy On Donald Trump and it turns out.....he's right.....
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.



The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/apr/13/british-spies-first-to-spot-trump-team-links-russia

 
The claims prompted an extremely unusual rebuke from GCHQ, which generally refrains from commenting on all intelligence matters. The agency described the allegations first made by a former judge turned media commentator, Andrew Napolitano, as “nonsense”.

“They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored,” a spokesperson for GCHQ said.

:lies:
LIES%21.gif
LIES%21.gif
LIES%21.gif



Instead both US and UK intelligence sources acknowledge that GCHQ played an early, prominent role in kickstarting the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, which began in late July 2016.
 
Back
Top