Witness says driver who hit church bus and killed 13 ADMITTED HE WAS TEXTING

That sounds like the typical lefty argument of "I'm pro choice but I don't support abortion".

You don't support ANYTHING designed to stop those driving drunk. So, let's set the record straight. You don't have to use the exact words to say the same thing.

Do you understand me now, pussy anarchist????? If not, let's hope only those it's people like you that suffer from them doing so.

I understand that you think the constitution is useless when it prevents you from doing what YOU think is right, and that makes you a statist, got it PUSSY????????

what you ARE is a hateful fucking bigot that prefers slavery to freedom because, lets face it, you're a fucking coward who is terrified that the freedom of others puts you and yours at risk. I hope you find yourself on the wrong end of a bad cop on a really bad day and find that you can't do shit about it.
 
I understand that you think the constitution is useless when it prevents you from doing what YOU think is right, and that makes you a statist, got it PUSSY????????

what you ARE is a hateful fucking bigot that prefers slavery to freedom because, lets face it, you're a fucking coward who is terrified that the freedom of others puts you and yours at risk. I hope you find yourself on the wrong end of a bad cop on a really bad day and find that you can't do shit about it.

The only person's life that should be put at risk by your choices is YOURS. Only a coward would think anyone but himself should be at risk for a choice another person made. What are you afraid of, son, standing up for what you believe in an do without dragging others down to your lower than dog shit level? Sounds like it. You seem believe your freedom to do things should leave others at risk. Just as I said, you WANT to drive drunk and don't believe anyone should tell you that you shouldn't.
 
The only person's life that should be put at risk by your choices is YOURS. Only a coward would think anyone but himself should be at risk for a choice another person made. What are you afraid of, son, standing up for what you believe in an do without dragging others down to your lower than dog shit level? Sounds like it. You seem believe your freedom to do things should leave others at risk. Just as I said, you WANT to drive drunk and don't believe anyone should tell you that you shouldn't.

If all you can do is put 'words' in others mouths, then all your arguments are shit. you don't believe in freedom and your statement here is proof. Freedom REQUIRES risk. The founders KNEW this and some even stated that they would rather have liberty that attended TOO MUCH risk, than to have too little and not be free. But you go on thinking that you know what others REALLY want to do, since it's worked out so idiotically well for you so far........NOT!!!!!
 
If all you can do is put 'words' in others mouths, then all your arguments are shit. you don't believe in freedom and your statement here is proof. Freedom REQUIRES risk. The founders KNEW this and some even stated that they would rather have liberty that attended TOO MUCH risk, than to have too little and not be free. But you go on thinking that you know what others REALLY want to do, since it's worked out so idiotically well for you so far........NOT!!!!!

What I do is actually say what you believe but don't have the guts to say.

I believe you can do whatever you want, whenever you want to the point that doing so involves affecting the freedom of others. The founders did NOT advocate you being able to take a risk if doing so meant risking someone else's life. Thinking so means you believe your freedoms can be taken even if it restricts someone else's freedoms. The founder believed you can take all the risks YOU want with YOUR life. They did not advocate you putting someone else's life at risk. If you think so, you're just the typical anarchist, crybaby, spoiled brat whose mommy never told him no.

You sound like the kind of dumbass that believes a person should have the right to run a meth lab in his house even if it risks blowing up the neighbors house next door. That's not what the founders believed.
 
Amazing how this story has vanished from the controlled media. The auto industry told them to drop it and they did. If a gun nut killed 13 people, it would be lead story for weeks.
 
HAHAHA. The board notes that all you have is namecalling. If blacks are mentally equal to whites then explain

1. Why blacks come in last in all standardized tests. And if you say the tests are written by and for whites, then explain why asians do so well on the tests

2. Why africa is the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. Don't say it's because of racism - all of black africa is controlled by blacks and has been for decades.

3. Why 50 years of affirmative action special treatment for american blacks has resulted in them falling further behind.

what is the response of zappa? :)
 
What I do is actually say what you believe but don't have the guts to say.
no, you don't. you've continually lied about what i've said to suit your own idiot purposes.

I believe you can do whatever you want, whenever you want to the point that doing so involves affecting the freedom of others. The founders did NOT advocate you being able to take a risk if doing so meant risking someone else's life.
so you believe the founders never believed in individuals carrying their own firearms? interesting.

You sound like the kind of dumbass that believes a person should have the right to run a meth lab in his house even if it risks blowing up the neighbors house next door. That's not what the founders believed.
THIS is what i'm talking about. your idiot hyperbole to paint the most extreme position of something YOU don't believe in.
 
no, you don't. you've continually lied about what i've said to suit your own idiot purposes.

so you believe the founders never believed in individuals carrying their own firearms? interesting.


THIS is what i'm talking about. your idiot hyperbole to paint the most extreme position of something YOU don't believe in.

Sorry, the founders didn't intend, when they spoke of freedoms, to mean you exercising your should put my or anyone else's life at risk.

I don't paint extremes. I use examples to point out the idiocy of your incorrect thinking about the founders, exercising freedom, and putting others at risk by doing so.

The founders believed in the right to bear arms. They didn't believe you exercising that right meant you could stand in the middle of the road and randomly shoot in all directions.

You said you disagree with things designed to keep a drunk driver from killing an innocent person that has the right to life. You said that you believe the founders meant you exercising your rights involved putting others at risk. You said that the action that should be taken for a drunk driver is one of punishment AFTER they kill or hurt an innocent person.

Your entire mindset involves around you being able to do what you want without regard of how exercising those freedoms negatively affect others. Maybe you missed the part involving rights where you exercising yours can't violate or restrict the rights of others. You only seem to have picked up on the freedom part not the responsibility part. Typical spoiled brat anarchist.
 
You said you disagree with things designed to keep a drunk driver from killing an innocent person that has the right to life.

when those things violate the 4th Amendment, yes I do disagree with them and the checkpoints that we're talking about violate the 4th Amendment.

i'm done with your stupidity and bullshit lies about what you think i've said.
 
when those things violate the 4th Amendment, yes I do disagree with them and the checkpoints that we're talking about violate the 4th Amendment.

i'm done with your stupidity and bullshit lies about what you think i've said.

You keep proving what I said. I said that you oppose things that prevent innocent people being killed by drunk drivers and you said you agree that you oppose them. I said you believe that the lives of innocent people should be put at risk so the freedom you believe people have to drive drunk can be exercised and you agreed.

The 4th amendment does not protect you when doing things that put the lives of others at risk. You can't do whatever the hell you want then say fuck it when it comes to those actions putting others at risk. Put yourself at risk all day long. Put me at risk by your spoiled brat choices and expect me to do something other than say OK to the little pussy brat that you are.
 
Back
Top