EPA chief admits climate change is real — but ‘the real issue is how much we contribu

Nope.

The wingnut position was not always: "well of course we know the earth is warming and climate is changing....just don't blame humans!"

What a load of crap.


A decade ago the wingnut position was to first deny there was any warming at all.

Then the wingnut position became that a vast, global conspiracy of scientists were faking the dating, perpetrating a hoax, and deliberating falsifying the results. And if anything, that the earth was "cooling". That there certainly was not any global warming.

CLIMATE GATE. Your wingnut position is that there is a global scientific conspiracy to falsify data, a vast conspiracy that only wingnuts have been able to penetrate.

You wingnut climate deniers have been all over the map, and switched it up a full 180 degrees.

You are not allowed, now or ever, to claim that the wingnuts had a perfectly innocent, reasonable and scientifically sound position on this. You all spent over a decade promoting conspiracy theories and denying global warming and climate change.

What are you personally doing to mitigate damage to mother erf?

What have you given up?

My mountain retreat is completely off grid. I have hydro and solar, wood for heat. How about you?

Let me guess little ole you can't be expexted to solve the problem so you will sit on your hands right?
 
Hey idiot.. the Earth's atmosphere was designed to function with a certain natural CO² level. When you artificially increase that level, it doesn't take a genius to understand the high likelihood of a negative side effect.

But then again, you climate change deniers are as far from geniuses as it gets.

The erf was "designed"? Who designed it? How do you know the intent of the "design"? Do you have the original blue prints?
 
I would love to see the liberals alarmists explain why many-many centuries ago, the earth was way warmer then anything we're experiencing and life was abundant with very large plants and insects.

Where was mankind to influence it?

Stupid fucking question.
 
What are you personally doing to mitigate damage to mother erf?

What have you given up?

My mountain retreat is completely off grid. I have hydro and solar, wood for heat. How about you?

Let me guess little ole you can't be expexted to solve the problem so you will sit on your hands right?

None of what you're doing individually makes even the tiniest iota of difference.
 
Is domer even aware why 286 - 360 million years ago, is referred to as the "Carboniferous Period"??

Sure am Dumbfuck. What's your point? How many people were around to be impacted by it? Moronic question.

The fact is, idiot, CO2 levels have spiked, with the current levels the highest in about the last almost million years. What the fuck do you think is happening? More volcanoes?

But it's just a plant food, isn't it shit-for-brains?
 
The likes of NOAA have tried to eliminate the MWP as it is extremely inconvenient to their CAGW narrative. By the way before some stupid git pipes up, yes I mean you Gonad, Cypress and Dumber76, Judith Curry is a climatologist!!

https://judithcurry.com/2015/06/04/has-noaa-busted-the-pause-in-global-warming/

Sent from my iPhone 10S

I want you to review my posts, you illiterate fucking twit. Not once have I mentioned warming. I've merely been trying to nail down the sciencetards on their moronic claims of "just a trace plant food".

Try to keep up, asshole.

Although, as a "scientist", you might address increased CO2 levels and ocean acidity.
 
You are such an anal retentive!! CO2 concentration is expected to double to 560 ppm by 2070 and cause around 1.2k of warming. So that's 300 years from the start of the Industrial Age. By that time fossil fuels will very largely be replaced by nuclear fusion and 4th/5th gen nuclear fission. Even if CO2 were to double again, the climate forcing effect would be substantially less as the relationship is logarithmic in nature as determined by this equation published by the IPCC.


Delta F = 5.35 ln (C/Co), (1)

where C is CO2 concentration in parts per million by volume and Co is the reference concentration. The formula predicts a radiative forcing of 3.71 Wm-2 for a doubling of carbon dioxide concentration from 1770 to 2070.


Sent from my iPhone 10S

Whoop-Dee-fucking-doo.

Other than your cut-and-paste, what's your point? Obviously, you missed mine.
 
Last edited:
Whoop-Dee-fucking-foo.

Other than your cut-and-paste, what's your point? Obviously, you missed mine.

You may want Pamela Anderson to give you a BJ, but that's not going to happen either.

I want you to review my posts, you illiterate fucking twit. Not once have I mentioned warming. I've merely been trying to nail down the sciencetards on their moronic claims of "just a trace plant food".

Try to keep up, asshole.

Although, as a "scientist", you might address increased CO2 levels and ocean acidity.


Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
You may want Panels Anderson to give you a BJ, but that's not going to happen either.



Sent from my iPhone 10S

That's your point? I didn't think it was going to be THAT deep and nuanced.

What else do you have to cut-and-paste? An article from some extremist nutcase in a third rate university?
 
99.999 % of the earths climate is directly controlled by the sun.....and nothing we do will ever change that FACT.....you can take that to the bank....
 
That's your point? I didn't think it was going to be THAT deep and nuanced.

What else do you have to cut-and-paste? An article from some extremist nutcase in a third rate university?
It pointless having a scientific discussion, you just don't have the chops.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
It pointless having a scientific discussion, you just don't have the chops.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

(laughing)

Hey, what's the source of your C in the C/Co? More volcanoes?

Spend your energy telling your scientifically challenged buddies about it just being a "trace plant food".

I look forward to your next cut-and-paste.
 
Sure am Dumbfuck. What's your point? How many people were around to be impacted by it? Moronic question.

The fact is, idiot, CO2 levels have spiked, with the current levels the highest in about the last almost million years. What the fuck do you think is happening? More volcanoes?

But it's just a plant food, isn't it shit-for-brains?

And your reply did nothing to explain why life flourished, when the CO2 levels were higher.
You apparently also aren't aware of how it affected the ice sheets or that one major volcanic eruption has more of an impact on the atmosphere, then mankind ever has had.
 
Back
Top