You are at the top of the dumbshit list, idiot.
Want to take a stab at my questions or just dodge them like the other RW tardfucks?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
EPA chief admits climate change is real — but ‘the real issue is how much we contribu
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
You are at the top of the dumbshit list, idiot.
Want to take a stab at my questions or just dodge them like the other RW tardfucks?
Without plants we would die you fucking imbecile.
Socktard.
Once again, stupid fuck, the posts evade you. The claim is CO2 is plant food. Big fucking deal. So is potassium. Slug down some of that "plant food", douchebag.
Fucking cretinous asswipes.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Domer, you are without a doubt the dumbest sock to ever exist. GFY asshole. You can't even follow simple conversations.
Fucking Cypress at it again. Climate sensitivity has been overstated in climate models. Look it up, dumbass. Your whole belief system is based on models and statistical games like adjusting accurate temps to conform with less accurate temps. (ERSST v4 buoy temps adjusted to less accurate ship inlet temps. The pausebuster is based on adjusting past temps)
Just look at the USHCN and the final minus raw figures. I think you can see the anthropogenic signal!
Just look at the USHCN and the final minus raw figures. I think you can see the anthropogenic signal!
Once again, stupid fuck, the posts evade you. The claim is CO2 is plant food. Big fucking deal. So is potassium. Slug down some of that "plant food", douchebag.
Fucking cretinous asswipes.
Look it up: The earth is in a period with an historically CO2 starved atmosphere.
Plants and sea life all evolved in greater concentrations of CO2.
Domer, you are without a doubt the dumbest sock to ever exist. GFY asshole. You can't even follow simple conversations.
(laughing)
Once again, you can't respond for your fellow science-challenged imbeciles, nor for yourself. I'll give you another chance. Here are their claims.
1) CO2 is a trace component in our atmosphere. (trying to diminish the significance of the current levels)
2) CO2 is a "plant food". (trying to downplay its danger)
Since you fucking Einsteins seem to have the answers, I pose the following questions for you and your fellow sciencetards.
1) At what point does "trace" become "greater than trace"?
2) Potassium is also a "plant food", idiot. Want to suck down a couple grams or not?
Fucking RW sciencetards.
Last edited:
Look it up: The earth is in a period with an historically CO2 starved atmosphere.
Plants and sea life all evolved in greater concentrations of CO2.
1) The current levels are the highest in about the last 800,000 years.
2) Great. We aren't plant and sea life.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Domer is a mental midget. He can't even stay focused and thinks saying we should eat potassium is a good analogy and good point.
It is beyond stupid.
It is beyond stupid.
Domer is a mental midget. He can't even stay focused and thinks saying we should eat potassium is a good analogy and good point.
It is beyond stupid.
Yep. I could see that coming. Gonna suck the dicks of the sciencetards that claim CO2 is just a "plant food".
(laughing) Mommy skipped science when she home-schooled you, didn't she?
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
I know EXACTLY what CO2 is you fucking idiot. That's why I'm challenging you and your fellow sciencetards on your claims. I realize the best you can do, cretin, is provide a wiki link.
You are such a weak-minded twit, loser. Just like the other shitwipes, you walk into a thread and make bullshit claims and can never back them up.
Fucking moronic loser.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Fine, don't educate yourself. You're just angry, bitter socktroll.
Fine, don't educate yourself. You're just angry, bitter socktroll.
(laughing)
Science escapes you, doesn't it tard? I've forgotten more chemistry than you'll ever know the rest of your life.
Want to respond to the two claims?
CO2 is just a "trace" compound. When does trace become greater than trace?
CO2 is just a plant food. So fucking what? That has nothing to do with the issue at hand. So is K. Want to eat a couple grams?
I await your
1) Silence, or (most likely)
2) Your idiotic response.
Really what does it matter. The OP admits climate change and simply questions the extent of man's contribution.
There is no quarrel. Let's fix it.
Roll back carbon emissions or other pollutants that trap heat. Fuck. Even the gas companies are on board. Even T mother Boone fucking greasy oil Pickens is a wind farmer. Why the HELL do you welfare collecting republican Limbaugh cult followers care? You are just grist in their mill.
There is no quarrel. Let's fix it.
Roll back carbon emissions or other pollutants that trap heat. Fuck. Even the gas companies are on board. Even T mother Boone fucking greasy oil Pickens is a wind farmer. Why the HELL do you welfare collecting republican Limbaugh cult followers care? You are just grist in their mill.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Really what does it matter. The OP admits climate change and simply questions the extent of man's contribution.
There is no quarrel. Let's fix it.
Roll back carbon emissions or other pollutants that trap heat. Fuck. Even the gas companies are on board. Even T mother Boone fucking greasy oil Pickens is a wind farmer. Why the HELL do you welfare collecting republican Limbaugh cult followers care? You are just grist in their mill.
You're not very bright, are you?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...ldnt-worry-about-man-made-global-warming.html
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Look it up: The earth is in a period with an historically CO2 starved atmosphere.
Plants and sea life all evolved in greater concentrations of CO2.
I would love to see the liberals alarmists explain why many-many centuries ago, the earth was way warmer then anything we're experiencing and life was abundant with very large plants and insects.
Where was mankind to influence it?
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Is domer even aware why 286 - 360 million years ago, is referred to as the "Carboniferous Period"??
cancel2 2022
Canceled
The likes of NOAA have tried to eliminate the MWP as it is extremely inconvenient to their CAGW narrative. By the way before some stupid git pipes up, yes I mean you Gonad, Cypress and Dumber76, Judith Curry is a climatologist!!I would love to see the liberals alarmists explain why many-many centuries ago, the earth was way warmer then anything we're experiencing and life was abundant with very large plants and insects.
Where was mankind to influence it?
https://judithcurry.com/2015/06/04/has-noaa-busted-the-pause-in-global-warming/
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You are such an anal retentive!! CO2 concentration is expected to double to 560 ppm by 2070 and cause around 1.2k of warming. So that's 300 years from the start of the Industrial Age. By that time fossil fuels will very largely be replaced by nuclear fusion and 4th/5th gen nuclear fission. Even if CO2 were to double again, the climate forcing effect would be substantially less as the relationship is logarithmic in nature as determined by this equation published by the IPCC.I know EXACTLY what CO2 is you fucking idiot. That's why I'm challenging you and your fellow sciencetards on your claims. I realize the best you can do, cretin, is provide a wiki link.
You are such a weak-minded twit, loser. Just like the other shitwipes, you walk into a thread and make bullshit claims and can never back them up.
Fucking moronic loser.
Delta F = 5.35 ln (C/Co), (1)
where C is CO2 concentration in parts per million by volume and Co is the reference concentration. The formula predicts a radiative forcing of 3.71 Wm-2 for a doubling of carbon dioxide concentration from 1770 to 2070.
Sent from my iPhone 10S
Last edited:
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I would love to see the liberals alarmists explain why many-many centuries ago, the earth was way warmer then anything we're experiencing and life was abundant with very large plants and insects.
Where was mankind to influence it?
Their lame explanation is that this is "much faster". Of course that is what the manipulated models tell them so.........