Orange Tweet is back!

You seem to believe trump and disbelieve Comey. What is so hard about trump making public the evidence and putting an end to this? Seems to me it would be the perfect way to shut people up about his own dishonesty while at the same time getting Obama for alleged illegal surveillance.

"Here is the pull-quote:

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Mr. Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement.


Really? I seem to believe Trump, when I've stated twice, and now for a third time, that I don't know if Trump is telling the truth.

It is funny, you disregard anything Trump or his admin says, but immediately accept unnamed sources that fit your political view. Actually, it is not funny, it is sad and what you do all the time.
 
Nah - you're all in on this one. Don't try to weasel out of it.

We'll know one way or the other.
We already know. trump had a major melt down in the oval office today, and left Bannon and Pubis in DC as he stomped off to Fla.

Comey just demanded that the White House retract their bullshit.

Game, set, match.


Poor Spicer is going to have a horrible Monday.

 
Let's make a deal.

I'll accept that Trump lied about the wiretap if you admit the Russian/Trump collusion is a lie propagated by the media.

Unless you have evidence.

I just want to know why trump won't release his evidence. The Obama people are stuck here, how can they prove they didn't do something?

I already posted the 25-page report from the IC about Russia. Maybe you don't accept its conclusions. Can you prove the connection IS a lie propagated by the media?
 
the white house has now called for a congressional investigation into the wire tapping. still think it's a fake story?
Sure...that's a great move. The wheels are coming off in a hurry.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...ecusal-russia-stories-tense/story?id=45908106

Before heading off to his so-called "winter White House" in Palm Beach, Florida, on Friday, President Donald Trump summoned some of his senior staff to the Oval Office and went "ballistic," senior White House sources told ABC News.
The president erupted with anger over the latest slew of news reports connecting Russia with the new administration -- specifically the abrupt decision by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 campaign.
 
I just want to know why trump won't release his evidence. The Obama people are stuck here, how can they prove they didn't do something?

I already posted the 25-page report from the IC about Russia. Maybe you don't accept its conclusions. Can you prove the connection IS a lie propagated by the media?

You have a problem.

If the IC has the evidence where is the indictment?
 
Really? I seem to believe Trump, when I've stated twice, and now for a third time, that I don't know if Trump is telling the truth.

It is funny, you disregard anything Trump or his admin says, but immediately accept unnamed sources that fit your political view. Actually, it is not funny, it is sad and what you do all the time.

trump and his people have a long, long history of lying and we all know it. That's who he is, and his people always have to cover or explain for him. From his campaign promises, to his opponents, to his personal life it's one lie after another.

What's funny is how you've claimed to be critical of trump, yet when other people are critical you call them out or call them liars, hysterical, etc. You do that all the time. As far as I'm concerned that's just an underhanded way of insulting people. "I don't know if trump is telling the truth"... but the rest of us are hacks and liars because we don't know if trump is telling the truth either, given that nine times out of ten trump is lying.
 
trump and his people have a long, long history of lying and we all know it. That's who he is, and his people always have to cover or explain for him. From his campaign promises, to his opponents, to his personal life it's one lie after another.

What's funny is how you've claimed to be critical of trump, yet when other people are critical you call them out or call them liars, hysterical, etc. You do that all the time. As far as I'm concerned that's just an underhanded way of insulting people. "I don't know if trump is telling the truth"... but the rest of us are hacks and liars because we don't know if trump is telling the truth either, given that nine times out of ten trump is lying.

Can't really thank this one enough.
 
I've been out of touch for a few days... but I returned to a new round of insane orange tweets!

He couldn't do it, he tried for a reset but this morning appeared to be his breaking point with more conspiracy theory angry ranting tweets that don't make any sense. I honestly think the man is having a mental breakdown.

Should the cabinet convene to consider removing him due to incapacity?

Hardly....what He can do as president of the United States is de-classify all this horse shit and show the nation the truth. Wire Taps...if any. After all it was FBI head Comey that dropped a dime about such things to president Trump...if there was nothing credible to see...Comey would have never told Trump where to look for the leaks. It seems all the leaks came from the illegal use of the NSA to spy on political opponents under the guise of accusing Mr. Trump and his team with Russian Collusion. Once all this is declassified and it surely will be as the President has requested Congress to open a formal investigation as he will soon appoint his legal team to investigate the last administration. Its in the works.....look forward to some real news...not fake news stemming from bits and pieces of illegal wire taps leaked to the press by Obama worms. ITS ALL GOING TO BE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE SHORTLY...the world will know.

How many times have you idiots already underestimated President Trump? The Clown won...why? He was smarter than you. This will be no different....he would not warn of such things if he did not possess the information. And Obama never denied anything....he simply said he never ordered it. Either some judge granted an illegal search warrant used under a false premise against a candidate for the Presidency of the Untied States of America....or someone directed the NSA to investigate political opponents just as they did with James Rosen. He got away with it once because he controlled the FBI, Intelligence, and the NSA...but...there is a NEW BOSS now in town.
 
Last edited:
trump and his people have a long, long history of lying and we all know it. That's who he is, and his people always have to cover or explain for him. From his campaign promises, to his opponents, to his personal life it's one lie after another.

What's funny is how you've claimed to be critical of trump, yet when other people are critical you call them out or call them liars, hysterical, etc. You do that all the time. As far as I'm concerned that's just an underhanded way of insulting people. "I don't know if trump is telling the truth"... but the rest of us are hacks and liars because we don't know if trump is telling the truth either, given that nine times out of ten trump is lying.

I'm going to lay this out for you and give you some respect. Unlike Think1, you have made a cogent argument.

Trump is a liar, and I have said so. What bothers me, is when liberals claim (automatically) that what ever he says is a lie. I call a poster who is a lying, a liar.

It is not an insult, but the truth.

When Trump has truly lied, have I ever called you out?

When people like Thing1 claim the Trump is absolutely false, and I merely ask how he knows this, Thing1 calls me a hack. For merely asking a question. If you follow the posts, he later changes his stance to 'well knows one really know if is true' (paraphrase). But he called me a hack and a defender for merely asking how he knew it was false.

When Thing1 calls me a hack and a liar, you seem to have no problem with that.

If you don't know if he telling the truth, then why automatically say he is a liar? CNN's title said it best, something like, without any corroborating evidence, Trump says Obama spied on him.

If you and thing had said something like that, I would totally agree.
 
I'm going to lay this out for you and give you some respect. Unlike Think1, you have made a cogent argument.

Trump is a liar, and I have said so. What bothers me, is when liberals claim (automatically) that what ever he says is a lie. I call a poster who is a lying, a liar.

It is not an insult, but the truth.

When Trump has truly lied, have I ever called you out?

When people like Thing1 claim the Trump is absolutely false, and I merely ask how he knows this, Thing1 calls me a hack. For merely asking a question. If you follow the posts, he later changes his stance to 'well knows one really know if is true' (paraphrase). But he called me a hack and a defender for merely asking how he knew it was false.

When Thing1 calls me a hack and a liar, you seem to have no problem with that.

If you don't know if he telling the truth, then why automatically say he is a liar? CNN's title said it best, something like, without any corroborating evidence, Trump says Obama spied on him.

If you and thing had said something like that, I would totally agree.

Clapper was already on NBC when you were asking me about the evidence, as were ample reports that Trump offered no evidence whatsoever.

Can you explain to me why we aren't allowed to take a repetitive pattern of behavior & draw conclusions from that pattern of behavior?
 
Can't really thank this one enough.

You're too stupid to write something like she did.

You can't compete dude. You constantly just insult those you don't agree with and when anyone gets the better on you in a debate, you just claim they are a troll, not worth your time, etc...You ever actually stick around and prove you point.

I think it is because you know you are lying.
 
You're too stupid to write something like she did.

You can't compete dude. You constantly just insult those you don't agree with and when anyone gets the better on you in a debate, you just claim they are a troll, not worth your time, etc...You ever actually stick around and prove you point.

I think it is because you know you are lying.

What did I lie about, hack?

This thread went bad for you - and fast. What did I lie about?
 
Back
Top