Oh Jesus. Let's get a little melodramatic here.
Ethical Question: Cloning Neanderthal
- Thread starter Taft2016
- Start date
Oh Jesus. Let's get a little melodramatic here.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
Depends how you want to define species. It's a tad arbitrary.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
This thread proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that we should never allow cloning.....our minds are not ready for it.....
Last edited:
Taft2016
Verified User
I knew you'd get it. You're a clever guy.
Would the world's religions accept neanderthals into their ranks?
Would the neanderthals recognize a divine Creator, or man as his creator? Or Re-creator?
And most importantly for liberals .... how would fundamentalist Islam view them?
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Well, if Blade Runner is any indication, it could definitely turn into a tragedy.
We should definitely do this, the knowledge gained would be enormous. The Neanderthals could live as kings and queens, they might be far superior to us in ways we can not imagine thus they could recreate the human race.
The aliens would not want this, as they want us to be like them...............
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
I agree.
Darth Omar
Russian asset
We should definitely do this, the knowledge gained would be enormous. The Neanderthals could live as kings and queens, they might be far superior to us in ways we can not imagine thus they could recreate the human race.
The aliens would not want this, as they want us to be like them...............
Omarosa....lol.
Taft2016
Verified User
On a related note, there is a species of antique that uses other species of ants as forced labor.
The difference is sentience you fascist shitstain.
Taft2016
Verified User
Oh dear, i think I just may have overdosed on irony....
Sorry retard but neanderthals are human.
What a retard.
Stick to trying to outsmart crack dealers flatfoot
And if young Frankenstein is any indication it could definitely turn into a comedy.
As does yours idiit
The truth being pointed out is both the modern elephant and the example found in fossil remains in North America are both of the Same Species...both are not examples of a supposed MACRO EVOLUTION claimed by the Darwinan Cultuists...but both are ELEPHANTS, the Mammoth clearly adapted to the harsh northern extreme climates....through "micro evolution" but the DNA signature never varies unless there is a MUTATION or something has been omitted from the DNA strain, then you have a deformed elephant not a new species of elephant.
News Flash.....even Elephants have hair...I have worn an Elephant Hair bracelet for decades. If you take an Asian
Elephant to an extreme northern climate, and it lived long enough to reproduce and carry on the bloodline...that hair would grow longer with each generation...the average weight would change depending upon diet, hell the tusks would adapt to the new environment over time. That's called "mirco-evolution"....and its a documented fact of science....or one could never prove that a wolf and a chihuahua are of the same family tree, there has been no MARCO EVOLUTION...the DNA remaining in both can trace that family tree.
A Rose by any other name is still a Rose...there is nothing new under the sun. A good example of proving that nothing can be documented to have had a Darwinian Evolutionary change...are the facts of LIVING FOSSILS. Some were presented by the pseudo philosophers calling themselves experts on evolution in an attempt to prove that fish grew legs and eventually became warm blooded mammals. But the example used was a big lie....they were using the coelacanth as evidence that it lived and died over 65 million years ago...and the fossil remains proved it was beginning a Darwinian Evolution change...it was GROWING LEGS. But...real science proved the fact that the Coelacanth never went extinct and it was never changing into anything other than what its DNA had programmed it to be....a fish that is still living today. What does this prove? If that fish fossil was from 65 million years ago its just another example of how NOTHING HAS CHANGED in over 65 million years.
Last edited:
No, that would be unethical. We should deplete the supply of republicans before exploiting the more intelligent and aesthetically pleasing protoNeanderthal, to the extent the Republican rat maze and shock platforms gene knockouts and phenobarbital sacking yields scientifically valid data.
Low hanging fruit first.
I used "we" the same way Doh'Mar did, dumbfuck. You are reading in words and claims that I did not make.
I did not say anything was settled much less lie about it. This is science fiction, how could anything be settled?
You are fucking stupid.
It flows from people who show a deep seated need to feel they are the chosen ones and all other life is merely fodder.
It's a creationists here who is advocating enslaving other humans.