Taft2016
Verified User
And yet the very discussion you dismiss as "moronic" is one I came across in a respected scientific journal.
You're a sad little man.
Ethical Question: Cloning Neanderthal
- Thread starter Taft2016
- Start date
And yet the very discussion you dismiss as "moronic" is one I came across in a respected scientific journal.
You're a sad little man.
Taft2016
Verified User
I don't want to talk about science fiction.
LOL, your entire thread is science fiction. I understand TapsOut you give up again.
Of course, it's not okay to enslave humans and that you even had to ask shows what a piece of shit you are.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
we give liberals human rights, why not Neanderthals who are probably more intelligent......
Taft2016
Verified User
Science journals do not publish science fiction.
This is a subject we could very likely be dealing with in our lifetime.
Again, you look silly.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
There would probably be a war between the two species.
In the novel "brave new world", the gov't engineers and breeds different "classes" of people, each tailored to be best suited for specific job types.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
were they the Nephalim?.....
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Could be. Or fallen angels or trolls
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
there a Russian who looks just like you who said the same thing........
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
It is still science fiction. You are just trying to evade the point of my question. It's okay if you piss yourself and hide in the corner again, TapsOut.
It has to be fiction until it is done, the question is how well preserved is the DNA
The point is, that just because it might be a different species does not make it okay to enslave another human or change whatever rights a human should have.
In all honesty, if we were isolated enough to fully speciate (which even neanderthals and h sapiens apparently failed to do) there probably would not be all that much opportunity for conflict.
Taft2016
Verified User
Lol....
No, it's quite real.
Just a like a manned space flight to Mars can be a reality shortly.
Your dream of man colonizing another planet, splitting off into two species, and subjugating one another is Ray Bradbury stuff.
And you know it.
Sad.
It's science fiction! Your OP asked us to speculate about a future technology and the ethics involved. My question was the same but left you in a quivering pile, TapsOut.
Taft2016
Verified User
But this is why I love liberals.
Pulling a 100% human fetus halfway out of the birth canal and vacuuming its brains out? A-OK, they love it to pieces.
Giving anything less than 100% Constitutional rights to another species? Ohhh, wait a minute there. Let's think this over.... hmmmm.
I can almost guarantee that if the human surrogate got cold feet halfway through the neanderthaling process and wanted to abort it, it would be some liberal loon stepping in to bring the case to court.
Pulling a 100% human fetus halfway out of the birth canal and vacuuming its brains out? A-OK, they love it to pieces.
Giving anything less than 100% Constitutional rights to another species? Ohhh, wait a minute there. Let's think this over.... hmmmm.
I can almost guarantee that if the human surrogate got cold feet halfway through the neanderthaling process and wanted to abort it, it would be some liberal loon stepping in to bring the case to court.
The point is, that just because it might be a different species does not make it okay to enslave another human or change whatever rights a human should have.
In all honesty, if we were isolated enough to fully speciate (which even neanderthals and h sapiens apparently failed to do) there probably would not be all that much opportunity for conflict.
Look moron, if it's another species then it's not another human
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
The point is, you ignore human nature. But then all advocates of socialist authoritarian big gov't do.
What if the new species is a bunch of violent socialist pigs who ignore election results and laws.
We were talking about the ethics of enslaving humans and I have not yet suggested they might should be given full constitutional rights. Now you are starting to test the limits of this SCI FI exercise but ok I will play along...
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
I don't see why Neanderthals would not be persons. You realize it's possible that your clone might be able to produce fertile offspring with modern humans?
Then cite it, tard.
Try this one, Jethro. Would you give Constutional rights to Superman? "Sophisticated" minds want to know!
lol