What did Noah build the Ark with and what it says about OEC

Micawber said:
Hypocrisy, irrationality, misogyny, homophobia, racism, antipathy to science and the first amendment, attempt to subvert and infuse public ed with your legends and myths, your tax scam, your financial criminal enterprise of extracting the meager funds from the poor by expoiting desperation with false promises of eternal life in candy land with a supreme being when what all evidence shows will happen is that we all will croak and be worm food.

Why do you ask, dick.
Click to expand...
You rattle off that list as if your side were incapable of any of that shit. How deceitful do you have to be, pervert?
 
Granule said:
You lying stinking liberal piece of pig shit. Earlier you told me that you don't tell Christians what they believe, and now you've just admitted that you do. Of course, that still doesn't change the fact that your opinions don't mean shit. lol

So why are you such a fucking liar, gimper76?
Click to expand...

You will not live forever Granny...
That is the grandest myth of all...
LMFAO
 
Granule said:
You rattle off that list as if your side were incapable of any of that shit. How deceitful do you have to be, pervert?
Click to expand...

Well, if I have a side it's secular humanist without party affiliation but pro-establishment in Govt and liberal leaning on most issues. Secular humanist alone definitionally excludes me from most of the items I listed. Pervert?
 
Taft2016 said:
Atheists are the most ardent proselytizers.
Click to expand...

No, you are just cowards. I have reality and truth to back me up and that gives one courage of conviction. Those who settle for incoherent nonsense and claims of magic don't have that.

You can whine all you want but it's not just ridicule. Throughout the "Oh. My. God." thread I kept trying, over and over again, to lead you to water. I asked you what facts might prove relationship to an ancestor in an attempt to impress upon you that it is those same things (not the technology they use) that supports relationships between species. You reject the scientific method and ignore all the facts that prove you wrong.

The same thing happened here. PiMPle had no answer for the fact that there is no proof for a capacity to build a large boat with stone age tools =>50000 ya. So he ignores it. I am not sure why he does not do the same about the Sumerian writing but I don't expect him to answer.
 
Granule said:
You lying stinking liberal piece of pig shit. Earlier you told me that you don't tell Christians what they believe, and now you've just admitted that you do. Of course, that still doesn't change the fact that your opinions don't mean shit. lol

So why are you such a fucking liar, gimper76?
Click to expand...

(laughing)

You poor, illiterate fuck. Believe what you want, limpdick.I'm just trying to give you a dose of reality.

There is no such thing as a virgin birth
People don't walk on water
They don't rise from the dead
A big boat can't be built by a 500 yesr old man
There is no Easter Bunny or Santa Claus
 
Dick from the Internet said:
No, you are just cowards. I have reality and truth to back me up and that gives one courage of conviction. Those who settle for incoherent nonsense and claims of magic don't have that.

You can whine all you want but it's not just ridicule. Throughout the "Oh. My. God." thread I kept trying, over and over again, to lead you to water. I asked you what facts might prove relationship to an ancestor in an attempt to impress upon you that it is those same things (not the technology they use) that supports relationships between species. You reject the scientific method and ignore all the facts that prove you wrong.

The same thing happened here. PiMPle had no answer for the fact that there is no proof for a capacity to build a large boat with stone age tools =>50000 ya. So he ignores it. I am not sure why he does not do the same about the Sumerian writing but I don't expect him to answer.
Click to expand...

Why do you feel a need to bring your dishonesty and straw man arguments into yet another thread?

You were unceremoniously exposed as an intellectual lightweight equipped only with the weakest talking points, which compelled you to argue as is you were debating a Biblical creationist, which I am clearly not.

But I understand. Somewhere along the way you no doubt had some sort of man-crush on a body-odored uncombed professor who mouthed similar uninspired platitudes, and by repeating them you can almost catch his scent again....
 
Taft2016 said:
Why do you feel a need to bring your dishonesty and straw man arguments into yet another thread?

You were unceremoniously exposed as an intellectual lightweight equipped only with the weakest talking points, which compelled you to argue as is you were debating a Biblical creationist, which I am clearly not.

But I understand. Somewhere along the way you no doubt had some sort of man-crush on a body-odored uncombed professor who mouthed similar uninspired platitudes, and by repeating them you can almost catch his scent again....
Click to expand...

Jesus was a virgin birth, correct?
 
Taft2016 said:
Why do you feel a need to bring your dishonesty and straw man arguments into yet another thread?

You were unceremoniously exposed as an intellectual lightweight equipped only with the weakest talking points, which compelled you to argue as is you were debating a Biblical creationist, which I am clearly not.

But I understand. Somewhere along the way you no doubt had some sort of man-crush on a body-odored uncombed professor who mouthed similar uninspired platitudes, and by repeating them you can almost catch his scent again....
Click to expand...


The proof of evolution and the scientific method do not care what sort of creationist you are. The way to prove a relationship between two people or different species is the same no matter what you believe. What sort of technology they are capable of using or some speculation about the future is not the way to do it and the latter is clearly not science.


This is my thread, dumbass.
 
Taft2016 said:
I see.

Mentioning Islam in a discussion about religious beliefs is a "diversion"?

No, it's only a diversion from your agenda, which clearly has nothing to do with religious beliefs.
Click to expand...

Was Jesus a virgin birth? Yes or no.

Did a 500 year old Noah build an Ark in 120 years? Yes or no.
 
domer76 said:
Was Jesus a virgin birth? Yes or no.

Did a 500 year old Noah build an Ark in 120 years? Yes or no.
Click to expand...

Did Mohamed move a mountain? Yes or no?

Should the POTUS have green the nuclear green light to a nation that governs on the basis of such irrationality, and who wants to spread it around the world, and who legally murders people who do not recognize it as fact?
 
Taft2016 said:
Did Mohamed move a mountain? Yes or no?

Should the POTUS have green the nuclear green light to a nation that governs on the basis of such irrationality, and who wants to spread it around the world, and who legally murders people who do not recognize it as fact?
Click to expand...

^Poor fucking diversionary pissant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top