So I'm an old earth creationist because I'm not a young earth creationist ...
I'm a Democrat because I'm not a Republican. What a dumbass formulation. Frankly, I don't care about moron taxonomy.
So I'm an old earth creationist because I'm not a young earth creationist ...
Are you taking lessons from TapsOut on cowardice?
Why do you accept OEC over YEC?
Then he let us eat meat. Praise the Lord!
Right, dugouts and rafts, if that 50000 years ago. I don't know about any skin covered boat. Where is there proof of those with stone age tools?
It would have been a struggle to build anything capable of carrying the people alone.
I take that as a "no".
Pussy
The God of the gaps fallacy.
It's weird though because with every naturalistic stone unturned it raises even more questions. For example, positing a naturalistic explanation for origins looked like an easy hurdle to clear in Darwin's day: they probably thought it would be solved by the end of the century.
But a century and a half later, we're seemingly farther away from the answer than we were when cells were assumed to non-descript blobs of protoplasm.
Some could argue it takes less faith to believe in Noah.
Not sure why responding to every one of your points is cowardice....but I do note that you never respond to mine....
I'm pretty sure I just explained that, but for the simple minded.....I believe in creation....I do not believe in a young earth....I will also point out that the Bible doesn't mention a young earth.....that is a belief of a handful of Christiansome and all atheists.....
Here are some other insights:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328544-800-neanderthals-were-ancient-mariners/
https://phys.org/news/2012-03-evidence-neanderthals-boats-modern-humans.html
Science and Archeology are finding new stuff all the time.
What facts led you to believe the earth is older than 6000-10000 years?
only if you are an extreme literalist......I've never actually known a young earther......the only people I know who think the Bible supports a young earth are actually atheists......Of course, the bible supports a young earth
What point did I miss? Let's see you made a crack about miniaturization. IDK, what that thread was about,
I am not sure why PiMPle is an OEC at all if he is going to accept the possibility of nonsense like miniaturization.
.
The only other point was you acknowledging my point that you have a deep seated need to feel special and be reaffirmed.
perhaps that we have samples of Sumerian writing older than 6000 years?.......why do you believe Christians have to believe in a 6000 year old earth?....
only if you are an extreme literalist......I've never actually known a young earther......the only people I know who think the Bible supports a young earth are actually atheists......
What? A whole 'nother thread of Dick being a dick?
I don't have to read it to conclude that he is assigning everyone literal Biblical beliefs, ignoring all comments to the contrary of that, and dishonestly presenting straw men?
You would be wrong little man. Fact is you are too ignorant to hold an intellectual discussion with. Insignificant. As you can see people with intellect are trying to have somewhat of a discussion. You are not included in that group. Run along now.
Has it stopped stinging?
No, I am basically trying to figure out how Christians decide to ignore facts and invoke magic. It seems to be based on the image the Christian wants to promote like your claim to accept evolution was, or to whoever the Christian is talking.
You would be wrong little man. Fact is you are too ignorant to hold an intellectual discussion with. Insignificant. As you can see people with intellect are trying to have somewhat of a discussion. You are not included in that group. Run along now.
Has what stopped stinging? Your profound intellectual dishonesty? Your lies, mischaracterizations, and straw men? They never stung, just annoyed.
I looked at the thread title and it said something about Noah's Arc. So I imagine you were thoroughly trounced on that topic as well, and have now taken this discussion in a different direction as well.
Par for the course with you.
The "no", cunt was your decision to not join the discussion about the OP.
Ark or no Ark, bitch?
That is the second time little man you have answered the same response. Both with drooling, limp wrists a waving, hissy fits. This is entertaining!