Trump is limited... Good news.

Yaya said:
Actually your own link proves you wrong. Guess you need to learn to read.
Click to expand...


Poor Yo Yo.

So eager to catch me in another one of his infantile "gotcha" games, he didn't bother to read the link and now he looks even more foolish than before.

:rofl2:
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Poor Yo Yo.

So eager to catch me in another one of his infantile "gotcha" games, he didn't bother to read the link and now he looks even more foolish than before.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Poor Zappa. Can't get enough Obama ass licking to realize what he posted disproved his own claim.

Pucker up, NL.
 
Yaya said:
Next time read your own link dim bulb.

Obama’s Justice Department in many of the cases handled the appellate process and ultimately defended the actions to the Supreme Court. But that’s commonplace, experts we spoke with said.

Goodlatte spokeswoman Jessica Collins contended that doesn't make the chairman's statement untrue. "Regardless of who started the policies that were overturned by the courts unanimously during the Obama administration, President Obama decided to continue those policies which were struck down," she said.
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

So desperate to be right, just once, aren't you Yo Yo.

Cherry picking Yo Yo leaves out a couple important statements in his haste to play "gotcha".

"But that isn't really what Goodlatte claimed. He said Obama "exceeded his presidential authority," not that Obama defended executive overreach.

Additionally, in many of the cases, executive overreach wasn’t really even at issue. For example, in United States vs. Jones, the court was ruling on whether the FBI had the power to use a GPS to track a suspect and gather evidence."

DAMN!

I get so tired of being right all the time!
 
NOVA said:
I claimed nothing about 'constitutional authority' being the reason he was overruled by the Supreme Court....

He was shot down, (for various reasons) about 44 times by the SC and I said 13 or 14 times by unanimous votes of the court....

FACT....

Learn to read.
Click to expand...

Actually, I could be wrong because some on-sources say Obama lost 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions.. a new record ?
 
CFM said:
Poor Zappa. Can't get enough Obama ass licking to realize what he posted disproved his own claim.

Pucker up, NL.
Click to expand...

What's "NL" stand for?

You aren't afraid to spell it out and prove to everyone what a gutless racist POS you really are, are you?

I also notice you still haven't proven your claim...just repeated it like the good little GOParrot you are.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Curious that you don't link to a single one...

Guess you ARE wrong...as I've been saying.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

And I admit I could be wrong......but then losing 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions is much worst...

Even more curious you don't know how to do your own search....

Poor poor zippermouth....schooled again.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
:rofl2:

So desperate to be right, just once, aren't you Yo Yo.

Cherry picking Yo Yo leaves out a couple important statements in his haste to play "gotcha".

"But that isn't really what Goodlatte claimed. He said Obama "exceeded his presidential authority," not that Obama defended executive overreach.

Additionally, in many of the cases, executive overreach wasn’t really even at issue. For example, in United States vs. Jones, the court was ruling on whether the FBI had the power to use a GPS to track a suspect and gather evidence."

DAMN!

I get so tired of being right all the time!
Click to expand...

That doesn't take away the fact YOU left out the truth and that Obama did in fact LOSE those cases. Ooooops.

You're a constant liar and an idiot.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Poor Yo Yo.

So eager to catch me in another one of his infantile "gotcha" games, he didn't bother to read the link and now he looks even more foolish than before.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

Oooops, you lied again, not only did I read it, but I quoted the relevant section.

So eager to lie about me and play your infantile gotcha games.

Poor Zappa.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Oh WOW...so the SPOKESWOMAN for Rep Goodlatte agrees with him...what a total SHOCKER!

From the link:

"Goodlatte’s assertion doesn’t seem to hold water. Susan Bloch, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University, said the NLRB case is very different than the rest of the cases on the list, in that the court actually was ruling on a separations of power issue and a presidential overreach."

Maybe someday, just once you will read the link before erupting with more ignorance.
Click to expand...

That doesn't take away from the FACT Obama was overturned you dishonest POS.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
What's "NL" stand for?

You aren't afraid to spell it out and prove to everyone what a gutless racist POS you really are, are you?

I also notice you still haven't proven your claim...just repeated it like the good little GOParrot you are.
Click to expand...

You claim to be so smart. Tell me what you think it means.
 
Jarod said:
Trumps Tweet, (comma splice not withstanding) was good news for those of us who feared he would not follow the rule of law.

Many of Trumps comments and personality traits led me to believe he was a tyrant who knew no bounds. He acts like he does not care about anything or anyone who disagrees with him and will not respect any such limits on him actions.

However his Tweet last night was good news.

"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"


That seemingly defiant tweet is a subtle acknowledgement of the rule of law and authority of the Court. Trump could have said, "The security of our nation is at stake" and then instructed his departments to enforce the ban anyway. We would be facing Constitutional crisis and a Coup D'etat, as I have previously mentioned in other threads.

In that one Tweet, grammar aside, Trump recognized and reaffirmed the authority of the Court even when the Nations security is at stake. I dont know if that was his intention, but even so, I am happy with the result.
Click to expand...
We have had this conversation before and I told you then that he wasn't a tyrant. Naive and inexperienced yes, but he'll learn quick enough. You lot do make me laugh, a friend of mine who came from Yemen as a child went to the US last year and was refused entry. That was under the Obama regime, what's your thoughts about that?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
We have had this conversation before and I told you then that he wasn't a tyrant. Naive and inexperienced yes, but he'll learn quick enough. You lot do make me laugh, a friend of mine who came from Yemen as a child went to the US last year and was refused entry. That was under the Obama regime, what's your thoughts about that?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Obama can do no wrong ?....
 
Rune said:
Tell us about all the American deaths at the hands of refugees.
Oh, none.
Idiot.
Fuck off and die.
Click to expand...

How many rapes have there been at the hands of Muslim men in Norway and Sweden, care to answer that? Oh and while you are about it, how many Germans and French have been killed by migrants?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
CFM said:
How many of the refugees that you support coming here are you personally taking in? Unless the answer is more than none, what are you afraid of?
Click to expand...

How is that relevant? I am not afraid, I simply have full house.
 
NOVA said:
And I admit I could be wrong......but then losing 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions is much worst...

Even more curious you don't know how to do your own search....

Poor poor zippermouth....schooled again.
Click to expand...

You made the claim, it's not my job to do your research for you.
 
Yaya said:
That doesn't take away from the FACT Obama was overturned you dishonest POS.
Click to expand...

LOST 44 cases in the SC by unanimous decisions

Ouch....thats gotta hurt .....

and pinhead zippy can't admit its true.....and gobbles up the convoluted spin on politifact whose only lame defense is harping on the reason for losing....

grasping at straws.....; the so called fact checkers are nothing by spin sites apologizing for liberals with lame ass word games......

LOST 44 cases in the SC ( by unanimous decisions ?) is just the plain facts of the matter....

who gives a shit why he lost, it won't change the fact that he lost...
 
Milagro said:
How many rapes have there been at the hands of Muslim men in Norway and Sweden, care to answer that? Oh and while you are about it, how many Germans and French have been killed by migrants?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

But Trump isn't trying to block all Muslims from coming into Norway or Sweden.

This discussion is about Trump trying to block all Muslims from entering America.

And, as Rune correctly points out, there hasn't been a single American death at the hands of a refugee.

But nice try at confusing the issue yet again...a pity you just can't seem to stay on topic.
 
Yaya said:
That doesn't take away the fact YOU left out the truth and that Obama did in fact LOSE those cases. Ooooops.

You're a constant liar and an idiot.
Click to expand...

I posted the ENTIRE ARTICLE along with the link so others could read it at their leisure, but according to Yo Yo, I left out the truth.

Yo Yo, when responding to my comment, LEFT OUT SIGNIFICANT portions of relevant comments, but I left out the truth.

Poor lying Yo Yo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top