Did he say he has refused to abide in the past?
Trump is limited... Good news.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Did he say he has refused to abide in the past?
He wont do that because its not about keeping America safe, its about fighting for power.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
When hasn't he?
Did I say he has not in the past?
zappasguitar
Well-known member
And right now hypocrite Trumpkins are giving their messiah a free pass even though they whined incessantly about the very same thing when Obama did it.
When do you plan on calling out those hypocrites?
He won't....is that what your crystal ball tells you? LMAO
Fact: this left wing ruling was not about the constitutionality of the order, it was simply a stay of implementing action. Another order in detail drafted in such a manner as to prove the urgent need to enhance immigration screening as demonstrated via the attacks in Europe that were generated by supposed Muslim refugees...is all that is required. The first EO can be stayed until hell freezes over, there is nothing in the ruling that stops the President from exercising his executive duty to defend the citizens of this nation.
Last edited:
Thats not how I read the evolution of the thread, but no matter....it comes as no surprise that Trump would and has to accept the ruling...
he already showed that by adhering to the WA. state judge, before it was taken up by Dist. 9.....
So you think the USSC is a biased court.....thats an interesting accusation....implying the Dist. 9 is less biased....?
Overturned in over 80% of their decisions....and you, by implication, opine they are not extreme...an 80%, what could be viewed as a failure rate, says to me, that something is radically wrong with someones logic and knowledge of the Constitution....course, I'm no lawyer....and don't quite know what 'Ivy League' bias means in laymen terms....
I don't know how far back in time these stats go, but I would assume it covers a variety of judges in both courts.....to me, they fucked up in 80% of their rulings and I assume the Supreme Court is far superior in brain power than Dist. courts.....thats just my opinion....
It made quite an impression on me learning that Obama was shot down 13 or 14 times in the Supreme Court by unanimous decisions....
guess it was that 'bias' again, huh......I don't think so.
Thanks.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Sorry, but as usual, you are wrong.
GOP leader: Supreme Court has ruled 13 times that Obama exceeded his constitutional authority
FALSE
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ader-supreme-court-has-ruled-13-times-obama-/
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Next time read your own link dim bulb.
Obama’s Justice Department in many of the cases handled the appellate process and ultimately defended the actions to the Supreme Court. But that’s commonplace, experts we spoke with said.
Goodlatte spokeswoman Jessica Collins contended that doesn't make the chairman's statement untrue. "Regardless of who started the policies that were overturned by the courts unanimously during the Obama administration, President Obama decided to continue those policies which were struck down," she said.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
In a crushing blow to the White House, the Supreme Court announced Thursday it was evenly divided in a case concerning President Barack Obama's controversial executive actions on immigration.
The one-sentence ruling, issued without comment or dissent, means that the programs will remain blocked from going into effect, and the issue will return to the lower court. It is exceedingly unlikely the programs will go into effect for the remainder of the Obama presidency.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/
Oooops
The one-sentence ruling, issued without comment or dissent, means that the programs will remain blocked from going into effect, and the issue will return to the lower court. It is exceedingly unlikely the programs will go into effect for the remainder of the Obama presidency.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/
Oooops
I claimed nothing about 'constitutional authority' being the reason he was overruled by the Supreme Court....
He was shot down, (for various reasons) about 44 times by the SC and I said 13 or 14 times by unanimous votes of the court....
FACT....
Learn to read.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Poor Zappa.
How many of the refugees that you support coming here are you personally taking in? Unless the answer is more than none, what are you afraid of?
zappasguitar
Well-known member
You claimed the SCOTUS had unanimously overturned Obama 13-14 times.
I provided the link which showed you how you were wrong.
Guess it's you who needs to learn to read...ROFL!
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Actually your own link proves you wrong. Guess you need to learn to read.
No Hillary as President. She struck out.
You puckered up to Obama's ass, NL.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Oh WOW...so the SPOKESWOMAN for Rep Goodlatte agrees with him...what a total SHOCKER!
From the link:
"Goodlatte’s assertion doesn’t seem to hold water. Susan Bloch, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University, said the NLRB case is very different than the rest of the cases on the list, in that the court actually was ruling on a separations of power issue and a presidential overreach."
Maybe someday, just once you will read the link before erupting with more ignorance.
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Douchebag Donald has always been limited with those midget hands.