obviously if you believe in a singular greater power who is different from everyone else's singular greater power you are creating your own faith.......
Says the cultist who adds to the flood story in a failed attempt to make it at all plausible.
obviously if you believe in a singular greater power who is different from everyone else's singular greater power you are creating your own faith.......
Says the cultist who adds to the flood story in a failed attempt to make it at all plausible.
PMP still has never answered when questioned about how the animals found only in Australia got there from Turkey
My uncle is a meteorologist.Oh, so you didn't know about the lack of understanding of clouds. Typical low information lib.
Pangaea?
In the last few thousand years?
Bill W created his own faith.
You are not addressing my points and are trying to change the subject.
Another problem with Pascal's argument is that it presumes the nature of God. Same thing with your nonsense. Both presume to know how God will judge and that God has accepted the bet. It's fallacious nonsense.
For instance, Wodin's metrics for judging is not belief but how well you fight. Of course, I am sure you ignore the stories and pretend that Wodin believes whatever you want him to believe
He's a cultist and his program is crap. Talk therapy is helpful all the other stuff is crap.
Back to the point... Pascal's wager implies a God with a specific identity, just as Norse Mythology does.
Why must that be the timeframe?
AA's 50% success rate tells a different story especially compared with western
medicine's 2% success rate.
My uncle is a meteorologist.
It is hardly the clown science you make it out to be.
???.....I don't recall adding anything......perhaps a bit of subtraction of detail.....Says the cultist who adds to the flood story in a failed attempt to make it at all plausible.
Why must that be the timeframe?
because he's a young earther.....
???.....I don't recall adding anything......perhaps a bit of subtraction of detail.....
Pangaea?
so I subtracted from YOUR understanding of a book you don't even believe in........lol......You claimed that Noah only took basal species on the ark. For instance, you claimed that one kind of feline was taken which gave birth to house cats and tigers in a single generation. LOL.
You also argued that maybe the flood did not cover the entire world which contradicts the bible.
You made it all up.
so I subtracted from YOUR understanding of a book you don't even believe in........lol......
Of course all the usual suspects jump on it and immediately start mewling and puking.Not a big Daily Mail fan, but this is a great article.
One of their own left the reservation. Witness the subsequent mauling and evisceration of his person.