AGW and belief in God

"So you're NOT really for cheap energy.
Got it!" BD #147

"I'm such an unbridled, strident advocate for abundant cheap energy !!" sear #132


I didn't realize how profoundly mentally impaired you are.

Obviously abstract concepts like absolute obvious logical opposites are beyond your capacity to comprehend, differentiate.

So tell us Bd. What's your favorite brand of crayon?

So now, you support "drill baby, drill"

Got it!
 
It is leftwingers like you that promote, excuse, justify and support the spread of the 13th century beliefs of Islam, Doofus.

I see you could not support your contention that "old" equals conservative. Oh, well.

No wormbrain. Liberals do not support Islam qua Islam, we do very much support freedom of conscience, which some small factions of Islam condemn. But that is no more paradoxical than my tolerating your ridiculous retarded machinations in the august forum, ass blister.
 
Belief in a singular power greater than one's self is hardly creating one's own faith

Bill W created his own faith.

You are not addressing my points and are trying to change the subject.

Another problem with Pascal's argument is that it presumes the nature of God. Same thing with your nonsense. Both presume to know how God will judge and that God has accepted the bet. It's fallacious nonsense.

For instance, Wodin's metrics for judging is not belief but how well you fight. Of course, I am sure you ignore the stories and pretend that Wodin believes whatever you want him to believe
 
Well the core requirements for admission to say Scripps requires all the hard core sciences and calc 1 and 2, physics with lab, chem with lab, extra year of either chem or physics.

And atmospheric physicists would disagree that the weather is simple science. Your comments are less than scintillating. Yes pun intended.

Weather? ... Oh, I thought we were talking about climatology. It's really quite easy. As I said, it's still in its infancy. There is soooo much that the climatologists don't understand ... for example, CLOUDS.
 
Bill W created his own faith.

You are not addressing my points and are trying to change the subject.

Another problem with Pascal's argument is that it presumes the nature of God. Same thing with your nonsense. Both presume to know how God will judge and that God has accepted the bet. It's fallacious nonsense.

For instance, Wodin's metrics for judging is not belief but how well you fight. Of course, I am sure you ignore the stories and pretend that Wodin believes whatever you want him to believe

I don't happen to believe that Norse mythology is a great modern religion.
I was merely replying to Sear's ridiculous comparison.
 
Weather? ... Oh, I thought we were talking about climatology. It's really quite easy. As I said, it's still in its infancy. There is soooo much that the climatologists don't understand ... for example, CLOUDS.

Shut the fuck up.
 
Bill W created his own faith.

You are not addressing my points and are trying to change the subject.

Another problem with Pascal's argument is that it presumes the nature of God. Same thing with your nonsense. Both presume to know how God will judge and that God has accepted the bet. It's fallacious nonsense.

For instance, Wodin's metrics for judging is not belief but how well you fight. Of course, I am sure you ignore the stories and pretend that Wodin believes whatever you want him to believe

Wrong.
Bill W provided a simplified bible interpretation (based upon work of the Oxford Groups) that was capable of being understood by the besotted mind of the active alcoholic.
 
No wormbrain. Liberals do not support Islam qua Islam, we do very much support freedom of conscience, which some small factions of Islam condemn. But that is no more paradoxical than my tolerating your ridiculous retarded machinations in the august forum, ass blister.

Oh please. Islam is the leftwing's pet religion. Any terrorism they commit is America's fault, according to liberals. And you support the global spread of Islam. These facts are inarguable.

Freedom of conscience? :rofl2:
 
Wrong.
Bill W provided a simplified bible interpretation (based upon work of the Oxford Groups) that was capable of being understood by the besotted mind of the active alcoholic.


He's a cultist and his program is crap. Talk therapy is helpful all the other stuff is crap.

Back to the point... Pascal's wager implies a God with a specific identity, just as Norse Mythology does.
 
The overiding message of all the great faiths is the same. I challenge you to prove otherwise

They are not.

So you are only including the great faiths? What are those? It does not matter that you are risking eternal damnation in a minor faith?
 
Rinos and Dems alike are nothing but thieves continuing to try and separate people from their money with this ridiculous carbon tax. "Economists" like this idea. I bet they do. :palm:
 
Back
Top