Given that the state fixed the problem before the feds ever got involved...
Pretty good....
Untrue
Given that the state fixed the problem before the feds ever got involved...
Pretty good....
That is what 5 decades of democrats gets you
Republicans smoke and drink lousy beer and feed at Arbys, what the hell do they care about health.
Low class.
It was one order by a GOP governor.
You don't even know....Untrue
(laughing) What I DON'T do, pal, is live in ignorance. You don't know from shit whether that water is pure. "I haven't gotten sick yet" is a laughable response.
You are a liberal
Liberals live in ignorance
You sir live in ignorance
Simple algebra
I'm laughing at a willfully ignorant moron that thinks just because his water comes out of the ground, it's "pure". You don't know shit about the quality of your water, fool. You get it "tested"? Yeah, sure you do. For what, tard? Or are you unable to even answer that question?
He hates having his stupid pointed ou which is why he bans us from his threads.
a built in economic disadvantage for American business.Republicans said the regulation placed an unfair burden on U.S. companies by requiring them to hand over key details of how they bid and compete while many foreign competitors are under no obligation to do the same. The GOP said the cost of compliance is estimated at $590 million a year — money that could be used to help produce more oil, gas and mineral resources.
means 60% are!"More than 40 percent of West Virginia’s rivers are too polluted to pass simple water-quality safety thresholds. They are too polluted to be safely used for drinking water or recreation, or to support healthy aquatic life."
http://www.appalmad.org/slider/west-virginias-streams-are-in-trouble/
means 60% are!
considering the sheer amount of coal mining that seems good. ,and there is no shortage of rivers/in WV.
a lot of (36%) still out there data . Still 40% is a lot - but what good would this reg do to clean it up?It doesn't mean 60% are good.
"The state has failed to collect sufficient data to determine the health of 36 percent of the streams in the state."
40% is really a shitty number. And the WV Legislature was doing all it could to prevent further evaluation.
a lot of (36%) still out there data . Still 40% is a lot - but what good would this reg do to clean it up?
and at what cost? Isn't it much of it coal related that is already being cleaned up? Or not?
SCOTUS rulings now require figuring costs....the old EPA considered none of this
I'm laughing at a willfully ignorant moron that thinks just because his water comes out of the ground, it's "pure". You don't know shit about the quality of your water, fool. You get it "tested"? Yeah, sure you do. For what, tard? Or are you unable to even answer that question?
He hates having his stupid pointed ou which is why he bans us from his threads.
havent drunk anything but alkaline water forpast 5 years. Regular water is for plebs.