So if Trump...

Don Quixote said:
i read the article and it is a typical altright hit piece with certain disclaimers like "numerous agencies besides the state dept had to sign off on the project" and "the authorization would be made at state at levels below the sec.". also, the decision to do this was made at a time when russian/usa relations were friendlier. not the best move our nation has ever made. also, if things get bad between russia and the usa the deal may be abrogated... this is not 'proof'.
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware that the New York Times was alt-right.

:tardthoughts:
 
Guille said:
So you're a coward. You clearly want people to think Trump did conspire with the Russkies but don't have the balls to say it.
Click to expand...

LOL. Coward? No. Just say'in. What's wrong, little man? People don't like your boy, do they? And every day it's getting worse for your side. What if he was involved? Bye bye Trumpkins.
 
Brain Food said:
did conspire with Russia on those Clinton emails couldn't that be construed as treason against our country? Again, if he did. Think about it. In my opinion it will be determined he was not involved. Why? The wheels of motion have been started for his presidency. It would cause to much of an uproar and make this country look even worse. And connecting the dots would have to be proven. But if he did? Treason? Hmmmm. Think about it. Look up the definition.
Click to expand...
Julian Assange says different, but why should you believe him!

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”

CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN

The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.

Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.

Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.

https://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2...-nightmare-dnc-leaks-inside-job-not-russians/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Julian Assange says different, but why should you believe him!

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”

CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN

The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.

Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.

Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.

https://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2...-nightmare-dnc-leaks-inside-job-not-russians/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

...and that's your "hail Mary" concerning Trumps involvement?
 
Brain Food said:
...and that's your "hail Mary" concerning Trumps involvement?
Click to expand...

Excellent!!!.....I can think of no better term to describe what we are currently seeing occur on the political front.......election hopes dashed, recount hopes dashed, electoral college hopes foundering........what is left to the left but a final Hail Mary toss by the CIA who know they haven't got a prayer of keeping their jobs when Obama is replaced by a man who doesn't tolerate incompetence........and now, having thrown their pass to the press, they refuse to tell the Congressional Intelligence Committee what the football looks like.......farewell CIA, we barely knew yah........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Excellent!!!.....I can think of no better term to describe what we are currently seeing occur on the political front.......election hopes dashed, recount hopes dashed, electoral college hopes foundering........what is left to the left but a final Hail Mary toss by the CIA who know they haven't got a prayer of keeping their jobs when Obama is replaced by a man who doesn't tolerate incompetence........and now, having thrown their pass to the press, they refuse to tell the Congressional Intelligence Committee what the football looks like.......farewell CIA, we barely knew yah........
Click to expand...

Wow! More than a 3 word reply, but you still said basically nothing. Nice to see you really do have fingers. Dots are starting to connect. Worried?
 
Last edited:
Brain Food said:
did conspire with Russia on those Clinton emails couldn't that be construed as treason against our country? Again, if he did. Think about it. In my opinion it will be determined he was not involved. Why? The wheels of motion have been started for his presidency. It would cause to much of an uproar and make this country look even worse. And connecting the dots would have to be proven. But if he did? Treason? Hmmmm. Think about it. Look up the definition.
Click to expand...

IF? nuff said. Looked up.

IF: the introduction of a conditional clause.
 
Brain Food said:
IF: Every channel, including Fox, said this story has substance then it must. Oh wait. More "fake news"?
Click to expand...

Hey....you are the one that made "IF" the qualifying contextual subject. Fox? You mean the left wing propaganda machine now owned by two sibling left wing brothers? Yes....I believe everything that Kelly tells us. LMAO
 
Brain Food said:
Wow! More than a 3 word reply, but you still said basically nothing. Nice to see you really do have fingers. Dots are starting to connect. Worried?
Click to expand...

that you won't be able to survive the whole eight years?.......yes, but it is tinged with a little bit of satisfaction that you might not.......I feel so guilty......
 
Brain Food said:
IF: Every channel, including Fox, said this story has substance then it must. Oh wait. More "fake news"?
Click to expand...

seems so, since the CIA can't produce the evidence to the congressional intelligence committee.......shame that, the CIA used to have so much promise......now its just a branch of the DNC.......
 
Ralph said:
Hey....you are the one that made "IF" the qualifying contextual subject. Fox? You mean the left wing propaganda machine now owned by two sibling left wing brothers? Yes....I believe everything that Kelly tells us. LMAO
Click to expand...

^^^Just another spin move pussy grabbing rebuttal. C'mon Ralphie, you could do better than that. LMAO LMAO LMAO
 
PostmodernProphet said:
seems so, since the CIA can't produce the evidence to the congressional intelligence committee.......shame that, the CIA used to have so much promise......now its just a branch of the DNC.......
Click to expand...

Ot oh. Hit a nerve, didn't I? Why be in denial? Things are coming to a head. Grab your pussy and hang on. Stay tuned.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Are you denying that Trump publicly called for the Russians to hack Clinton to help him win?
Are you denying that the CIA has confirmed that they did exactly that and it helped Trump win?
Are you denying that the constitution calls for any presidential candidate who uses a foreign government to get elected should be rejected by the Electoral College?
I didn't think so.
I am not confused... you are, shit stain...
Click to expand...

You are a confused young man, we already knew before Trump JOKED about the Russians hacking Hillary's email, That it had already been hacked by multiple foreign entities, now on to a bigger question for ya sparky, where are you on the fact that Obama tried to have an allies President defeated in an election?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top