cancel2 2022
Canceled
The pipeline was going to be moved CLOSER to the Sioux than it was to the people of Bismark.
While the Sioux living on the reservation may be a smaller group numerically, the pipeline was going to be much closer to them than it was to the people of Bismark.
How about just for once we cut the emotional crap and deal with actual facts? How is I can find this out but you lot just accept any old bullshit fed to you by your rotten media?
"Then there is the issue at the very HEART of the tribes claims ... the water intake at Fort Yates, just downstream from the pipeline’s crossing of the river (where the pipeline will be buried some 90+ feet below the river). The tribe’s KEY claim is the pipeline threatens what they say is the sole source of water for the reservation - the Fort Yates water intake, which is a few miles downstream from the DAPL river crossing near Cannonball, ND - the site of the protest.
It is very hard though for the water intake at the heart of the tribes claims to be threatened if it does not exist.
Which is a fact - and the tribe full well knows it. The water intake at Fort Yates - the one the tribes says is the primary source of the water for the reservation - is to be shut down in the coming MONTHS.
The tribe has known since 2003 this intake would be replaced. The tribes water utility business received close to $40 million in Federal Government grants, including nearly $30 million in 2009 and since to build the NEW water intake and new water treatment plant in Mobridge SOUTH Dakota - over 70 miles away".
https://m.facebook.com/notes/scott-...es-dakota-pipeline-protest-/10154529600627457
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Last edited: