Should an act of expression be a crime?

#NotMyPresident said:
"You may not like it but before ww2 went tits up Hitler was most likely beloved in Germany.But yeah Trump is most interested in being declared the best ever. Hitler acheived the love and everything because well whatever he did worked. People were no longer buying food by the barrel of money etc. It sucks that we have to admit it but if you value honesty and look at it from someone living in germany at the time hitler would probably have been a good thing. Unless your a jew :PNow Trump. Trump can't insulate himself from reality. We have unlimitted access to him thru twitter facebook etc. Remember if he fails he will be a one term president and he will do everything possible to prevent that."Hyperinflation was long over by the time Hitler seized office, Nazi. We should've wiped the Germans from the face of the Earth after WWII to punish them.
Click to expand...

ehh if they didnt love hitler he wouldnt have been in power. You can whitewash it all you want but he achieved something for teh germans. In fact if he stopped before poland he would probably be their greatest leader.
 
sear said:
#392

Hillary? A "liberal"?
Senator Clinton voted for the U.S. military invasion and occupation of Iraq. I doubt Bernie Sanders did.

It's a mistake to conflate Democrats with liberals. Sometimes they are. But then, sometimes, Republicans are.
Click to expand...

Doesn't change the fact that Hillary is who the liberals picked to nominate and tried to elect.
 
2000px-Germanborders.svg.png
This is what Hitler achieved for the German people. They were lucky they were left with that.
 
like i said if he stopped before poland. But since he lost he will forever be remembered as a loser.

Like stalin when the USSR broke up. He was dead by then but he will be retroactively named a loser.
 
#NotMyPresident said:
"You may not like it but before ww2 went tits up Hitler was most likely beloved in Germany.But yeah Trump is most interested in being declared the best ever. Hitler acheived the love and everything because well whatever he did worked. People were no longer buying food by the barrel of money etc. It sucks that we have to admit it but if you value honesty and look at it from someone living in germany at the time hitler would probably have been a good thing. Unless your a jew :PNow Trump. Trump can't insulate himself from reality. We have unlimitted access to him thru twitter facebook etc. Remember if he fails he will be a one term president and he will do everything possible to prevent that."Hyperinflation was long over by the time Hitler seized office, Nazi. We should've wiped the Germans from the face of the Earth after WWII to punish them.
Click to expand...

Continue crying Watermark; but CRY HARDER.

:evilnod:
 
Last edited:
sear said:
One of two things is true.

- Either the Trumpettes are so naïve they believe Trump's vague and glorious pledges: "Make America Great Again" - OR -

- they're so unethical that they know Trump is a liar; and they just don't care.

Which of those two explanations is supposed to be comforting?
Click to expand...

Thank you
 
NOVA said:
But you ignore LBJ, the man that actually did knowingly lie about the Gulf of Tonkin and is responsible for the deaths of 10x more than were killed
during the Iraq occupation by terrorists attacks....

Your just obsessed about Bush and Iraq....yet don't ever mention Albright saying that 500,000 Iraqi children killed during the Clinton admin. was 'worth it'.....

Your hypocrisy is unbelievable....
Click to expand...

Johnson didn't start the war liar.
 
sear said:
Perhaps.

BUT !!

Let's not forget the President Richard M. Nixon ploy.

In '68 Nixon campaigned on having a secret plan to end the Vietnam War.
Nixon was widely despised.

BUT !!

The electorate was so desperate to end the War, they voted Nixon into office anyway.

When Nixon's '72 re-election campaign was underway, Nixon was asked:

- Whatever happened to your "secret plan" to end the Vietnam War? The War is still going on. What are you waiting for? -

Nixon said he was following his plan, but that the electorate had to re-elect him, or he wouldn't finish; he wouldn't end the War.

And so, as astounding as it is to believe, they RE-elected him. Of course, he never completed his 2nd term. Resigned in disgrace.

But anyone that thinks Trump will legitimately succeed would not be likely to pass a urine test.

Tax cuts are the universal Republican refrain.

BUT !!

They refuse to cut spending further first.

I suspect, whether Trump intends it or not; if he gets the economic growth rate promised; our deficit and debt will $skyrocket.
Click to expand...
The first half of your post is an outright lie.
Nixon did end US involvement in the war.

The second half is obvious to any thoughtful person.
 
sear said:
A yes.
The familiar: - the other guy's a bum too! - defense.

Two wrongs don't make a right.
And if Trump cuts taxes as much as he'd have to to meet his GDP growth targets, he might pull a Reagan on us, & more than double the U.S. federal debt.

When will we ever hire a president that's willing to stop spending the $money of citizens yet unborn?

They're against abortion.
But they have no problem saddling them with $tens of $thousands of $dollars in $debt each!
Click to expand...

Bullshit.
The other guy didn't do what the conservatard blamed him for so it is not "the other guy did it too defense.
You are just a blowhard who likes the sound of your own voice.
 
sear said:
#392

Hillary? A "liberal"?
Senator Clinton voted for the U.S. military invasion and occupation of Iraq. I doubt Bernie Sanders did.

It's a mistake to conflate Democrats with liberals. Sometimes they are. But then, sometimes, Republicans are.
Click to expand...

All the major wars save war on a verb were started by Dems zippy
 
#416

I'm an honorably discharged United States military Vietnam era veteran.
I'm not recalling it from a text book I read at community college.
I read about it in newspapers, and saw Walter Cronkite reporting it 5 nights a week.

FYI R, calling a man of honor a liar is a bad play. If nothing else it's bad karma.
And though you wouldn't know, I understand behavioral psychology well enough to know that those that are quick to accuse others of lying are rather more likely themselves to be liars.

And I understand good communication to know that if there was a significant factual error in my post quoted in #416,
instead of contradicting it, a genuinely well informed poster would correct it: cite the error by direct quotation, and then post the correction. But from you we get:
"The first half of your post is an outright lie." R
Click to expand...
I'd invite you to prove it,
but I know you won't
because I know you can't,
because I know it isn't.
"Nixon did end US involvement in the war." R
Click to expand...
Not by 1972 he hadn't.
March 1973
The last American combat soldiers leave South Vietnam, though military advisors and Marines, who are protecting U.S. installations, remain. For the United States, the war is officially over. Of the more than 3 million Americans who have served in the war, almost 58,000 are dead, and over 1,000 are missing in action. Some 150,000 Americans were seriously wounded.

http://www.pbs.org/battlefieldvietnam/timeline/index4.html
Click to expand...
 
sear said:
#416

I'm an honorably discharged United States military Vietnam era veteran.
I'm not recalling it from a text book I read at community college.
I read about it in newspapers, and saw Walter Cronkite reporting it 5 nights a week.

FYI R, calling a man of honor a liar is a bad play. If nothing else it's bad karma.
And though you wouldn't know, I understand behavioral psychology well enough to know that those that are quick to accuse others of lying are rather more likely themselves to be liars.

And I understand good communication to know that if there was a significant factual error in my post quoted in #416,
instead of contradicting it, a genuinely well informed poster would correct it: cite the error by direct quotation, and then post the correction. But from you we get:

I'd invite you to prove it,
but I know you won't
because I know you can't,
because I know it isn't.

Not by 1972 he hadn't.
Click to expand...

You have no idea who I am do you?
No.
Yet you have taken it upon yourself to belittle me to gain acceptance of the brain damaged among us. You chose poorly and now you will pay. I am now your personal troll and not a post will be made by you without my checking it's factuality.

I said you lied because you made an untrue statement and I stand by that.
Nixon ended military involvement by the US. THAT IS FROM THE OFFICE of the US Historian. Now take your holier than thou attitude and shove it sideways up your ass.

Bottom line, you lied about Nixon, you are lying now to cover your lie.

FYI, I too lived through the history and watched the nightly news.
I have tried to help you since you came here since we are on the same side and you bandwagon with the stupid amongst us against me so never speak to me of honor again . Your actions are much louder and especially in your case indicative than your words.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top