Reason to vote third party/write in.

Teflon Don said:
He is an apologist living in a fantasy world. He gives the negro a bad name
Click to expand...

It's funny at several levels. Brown-as-shit stipulated to the fact the Hillary presents one face to the public and another to her inner circle, then he said "Democrats, progressives, minorities... will be watching and discerning her every move." As if the rank and file have ever seen 1% of the real Hillary.

Then of course there's the incredibly false narrative that Democrats and progressives are anything other that mind-numbed robots who would vote for Team D as Hillary marches them off to the gas chambers.
 
evince said:
DEMOCRATIC party


you are so commited to lies that you cant even type the name correctly lie fuck
Click to expand...
There's nothing democratic about your party, Syb. You know this. Now shut the fuck up and buzz your nurse. You're drooling uncontrollably and spraying everywhere.
 
anatta said:
you're so fucking stupid. honestly the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.

Does not case law evolve? How did CU come about? do you have any clues ( no).
Do some fucking research for once, and find out WHY it was ruled that way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
the majority ruled that the Freedom of the Press clause of the First Amendment protects associations of individuals in addition to individual speakers, and further that the First Amendment does not allow prohibitions of speech based on the identity of the speaker. Corporations, as associations of individuals therefore, have free speech rights under the First Amendment. Because spending money is essential to disseminating speech, as established in Buckley v. Valeo, limiting a corporation's ability to spend money is unconstitutional because it limits the ability of its members to associate effectively and to speak on political issues.

The decision overruled Austin because that decision allowed different restrictions on speech-related spending based on corporate identity.
Click to expand...

Wow, talk about ignorant.
Reseach the origins of the Revolutionary War you flailing retard.
 
Football Jersey said:
That's because we didn't have campaign finance reform. If someone had tried legislating it 200 years ago, we would have gotten CU much earlier.
Click to expand...

Untrue.
200 years ago Corporations were veiwed as a neccasary evil, their powers , even their longevity severely limited by charter, FOR JUST THIS REASON; that they never become able to exert undue influence.
I understand ignorant anatta's gross musunderstanding of the issue but you sir, there is no excuse for you spouting this nonsense.
 
Rune said:
Wow, talk about ignorant.
Reseach the origins of the Revolutionary War you flailing retard.
Click to expand...
WTF does the Revolutionary War have to do with campaign finance regs???????????????

1708904.gif
 
"I know......Democrats and progressives and minorities have been ignoring her moves for the last twenty years......why on earth would she expect them to start now......." #148
Click to expand...
I've never seen a perfect candidate.

Mitt Romney is an admirable man! He sets a fabulous example. He's a Republican that got elected to the top elected office in the People's Republic of Taxachusetts.
He's a charitable churchman.
And whereas Vlad Putin ended up costing Russia ~$20 $Billion for holding the Olympics in Socci, Romney actually turned a $profit for managing the Olympics in Utah.

Romney's a good man, and probably would have been at least an above average president.

BUT !!

Even Romney isn't perfect.
Mitt made his fortune w/ LBO's.
That means:
he'd borrow money to buy a viable business;
take that business over,
fire a lot of workers to increase the profit
and then sell at a profit.

It made him $rich!
But it cost a lot of workers their jobs.

$Trump's even worse. How many times has Trump stiffed his business partners? Declared bankruptcy so he didn't have to pay?
Trump actually had a gambling casino go bankrupt. How the %$#@ can a gambling casino go bankrupt?!

Yes.
Hillary is imperfect to.
In fact, there seems to be a perpetual shadow of scandal that surround both Clinton's.
But all in all; considering the widespread concern about Trump among Democrats, independents, and even prominent Republicans; Hillary seems to be the best choice.

I've voted Libertarian before. I might have considered voting for G. Johnson. But Gary is a goofball.
 
sear said:
I've never seen a perfect candidate.

Mitt Romney is an admirable man! He sets a fabulous example. He's a Republican that got elected to the top elected office in the People's Republic of Taxachusetts.
He's a charitable churchman.
And whereas Vlad Putin ended up costing Russia ~$20 $Billion for holding the Olympics in Socci, Romney actually turned a $profit for managing the Olympics in Utah.

Romney's a good man, and probably would have been at least an above average president.

BUT !!

Even Romney isn't perfect.
Mitt made his fortune w/ LBO's.
That means:
he'd borrow money to buy a viable business;
take that business over,
fire a lot of workers to increase the profit
and then sell at a profit.

It made him $rich!
But it cost a lot of workers their jobs.

$Trump's even worse. How many times has Trump stiffed his business partners? Declared bankruptcy so he didn't have to pay?
Trump actually had a gambling casino go bankrupt. How the %$#@ can a gambling casino go bankrupt?!

Yes.
Hillary is imperfect to.
In fact, there seems to be a perpetual shadow of scandal that surround both Clinton's.
But all in all; considering the widespread concern about Trump among Democrats, independents, and even prominent Republicans; Hillary seems to be the best choice.

I've voted Libertarian before. I might have considered voting for G. Johnson. But Gary is a goofball.
Click to expand...

Jill Stein is still available.:D
 
anatta said:
WTF does the Revolutionary War have to do with campaign finance regs???????????????

1708904.gif
Click to expand...

The Consitution was written by the winners of the war, retard, a war against corporations with governing power.
Goes to intent of the framers, but stay ignorant, please. You are funnier this way.
 
cawacko said:
I'm giving you another analogy. The Supreme Court said there is a right to privacy in the constitution this abortion should be legal. The dictionary doesn't say anything about abortion and privacy just like you say about money and speech yet it is the law of the land via the Supreme Court
Click to expand...

Interpretation of the thoughts of people long dead is the reason that I believe as Jefferson believed, the Constitution should be re-written every 19 years.

No generation should be held hostage to the thoughts of a society dead hundreds of years ago.
 
Right said:
It's funny at several levels. Brown-as-shit stipulated to the fact the Hillary presents one face to the public and another to her inner circle, then he said "Democrats, progressives, minorities... will be watching and discerning her every move." As if the rank and file have ever seen 1% of the real Hillary.

Then of course there's the incredibly false narrative that Democrats and progressives are anything other that mind-numbed robots who would vote for Team D as Hillary marches them off to the gas chambers.
Click to expand...

He won't watch shit. He is a disgrace to the negro
 
blackascoal said:
Interpretation of the thoughts of people long dead is the reason that I believe as Jefferson believed, the Constitution should be re-written every 19 years.

No generation should be held hostage to the thoughts of a society dead hundreds of years ago.
Click to expand...

There would be zero agreement or ability to rewrite a constitution once, let alone every 19 years.
 
Right said:
It's funny at several levels. Brown-as-shit stipulated to the fact the Hillary presents one face to the public and another to her inner circle, then he said "Democrats, progressives, minorities... will be watching and discerning her every move." As if the rank and file have ever seen 1% of the real Hillary.

Then of course there's the incredibly false narrative that Democrats and progressives are anything other that mind-numbed robots who would vote for Team D as Hillary marches them off to the gas chambers.
Click to expand...

Sorry I missed your post .. but damn, you're stupid. :0) Real stupid.

"gas chambers" :0)

If anyone ever wants an illustration of why the right has lost just about every social issue they care about .. I'll ring your bell.

Moron
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top