Reason to vote third party/write in.
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
If nothing else it is based on the false premise that money is speech.
It isn't.
I looked up both words in the dictionary and they are not related.
cawacko
Well-known member
The dictionary? For instance does the dictionary discuss privacy when giving the definition of abortion?
it was the only possible Constitutional decision.
I read the other day political appointees in DoJ are giving heavily to Clinton -that is a LOT more terrifying to
a neded independent DoJ -especially after what we've seen with Holder/Lynch.
If we want to get rid of CU -it takes public financing, or a Constitutional amendment.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
my party HAS voted to repeal the law 40 times......Reed failed to bring it to a vote 39 of those times........the 40th time Obama refused to sign it......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
yes I have.....because I want to know what you think you have to lose.....what have the Democrats done for you.......
cawacko
Well-known member
What did the founders day Desh?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
You're a coward.
You only care who we vote for because we won't vote for your all-white party, thus giving democrats a huge advantage in elections.
Thanks for playing.
English please
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
not hearing an answer there......
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
He's got your number. Give it up, Pastor.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
uh, BucKKKle.....you realize he and I have known each other longer than either of us have known you, right?.....
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
That doesn't alter the fact that he has you figured out, Pastor.
Poor Pastor Pimp.
cawacko
Well-known member
I'm giving you another analogy. The Supreme Court said there is a right to privacy in the constitution this abortion should be legal. The dictionary doesn't say anything about abortion and privacy just like you say about money and speech yet it is the law of the land via the Supreme Court
evince
Truthmatters
and he likely forgot what shit weasel you are
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
The democrat party has kicked you to the curb for the spics. Too bad for ya.
you're so fucking stupid. honestly the most pathetic thing I've ever seen.
Does not case law evolve? How did CU come about? do you have any clues ( no).
Do some fucking research for once, and find out WHY it was ruled that way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
the majority ruled that the Freedom of the Press clause of the First Amendment protects associations of individuals in addition to individual speakers, and further that the First Amendment does not allow prohibitions of speech based on the identity of the speaker. Corporations, as associations of individuals therefore, have free speech rights under the First Amendment. Because spending money is essential to disseminating speech, as established in Buckley v. Valeo, limiting a corporation's ability to spend money is unconstitutional because it limits the ability of its members to associate effectively and to speak on political issues.
The decision overruled Austin because that decision allowed different restrictions on speech-related spending based on corporate identity.