Was it legal for FBI to expand Weiner email search - part deux

U

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
christiefan915 said:
FBI Director James B. Comey recently announced that the FBI had discovered new emails that might be relevant to the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server. The emails were discovered in an unrelated case, and the FBI now plans to search through the emails as part of the Clinton server investigation. Comey’s announcement raises an important legal question: Does expanding the FBI’s investigation from the unrelated case to the Clinton case violate the Fourth Amendment? We don’t know all the facts yet, so it’s somewhat hard to say. But here’s why the expansion of the investigation might be constitutionally problematic.

If the FBI was searching Weiner’s computer, it presumably had a warrant authorizing the search of the computer only for Weiner’s communications with underage girls. If that is correct, going from that narrow search to a broader search of Clinton’s emails raises two potential problems for the FBI. The first issue is whether the FBI was permitted to search through Abedin’s email account for records of Weiner’s illegal messages with underage girls. In People v. Herrera, 357 P.3d 1227 (Colo. 2015), the Colorado Supreme Court provided some reason to think that the answer may be “no.”

There might be similar problems because the alleged Weiner texting crimes apparently occurred in 2016. I gather that the Clinton emails were from her time as secretary of state, which was several years earlier from 2009 to 2013. If I’m right that there was a several-year gap between the warrant crime and the second investigation, it’s not clear the government could search through older emails for evidence of such a recent crime. See Wheeler v. State, 135 A.3d 282 (Del. 2016) (holding that the Fourth Amendment was violated when a warrant to search computers for witness tampering that occurred in 2013 did not include a date restriction on how far back the search could extend; evidence of crime from a computer not used since 2012 suppressed as a result).

A second issue is whether the FBI was permitted to seize the Abedin emails, which were outside the scope of the warrant, and to use them to reopen the investigation into Clinton’s email server. I think this is the bigger legal issue for the FBI. Most courts have treated this as a matter of the “plain view” exception. But if that’s true, there’s a problem: The plain view exception does not allow evidence to be seized outside a warrant unless it is “immediately apparent” upon viewing it that it is evidence of another crime. Just looking quickly at the new evidence, there needs to be probable cause that it is evidence of a second crime to justify its seizure, which would presumably be necessary to apply for the second warrant. See Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987); United States v. Williams, 592 F. 3d 511, 522 (4th Cir. 2010). But it’s not clear how that would be the case here. Comey’s letter to Congress is really tentative.

The Fourth Amendment plain view standard doesn’t allow a seizure of emails based on a mere we-hope-to-later-determine standard. The government can’t seize the emails just because the Clinton investigation is extra important and any possible evidence is worth considering. Rather, the Fourth Amendment requires the initial look at the emails to generate “immediate” probable cause that they are evidence of a crime first, before their seizure is permitted and used to get a second warrant.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...llary-clintons-emails/?utm_term=.e6ce26482263
Click to expand...

YES, it's legal.
Anytime law enforcement uncover possible criminal behavior, even while investigating other different possible criminal behavior, they have an obligation to investigate.

CRY HARDER LIBERALS

:lol:
 
tsuke said:
im loving that weiner had it under "life insurance" in his computer :) Must be juicy stuff if he was relying on it to prevent suicide by revolver to back of head.
Click to expand...

If this is true, it's funnier then anything else that could have happened.

:lol:
 
um guys


emails are not illeagal remember



tell me why two days before comey sent his letter to republicans in congress rudi julianni was on TV bragging that they had some NEW Hilary breaking news coming



Comey claims he found out the day before he sent the letter




who in FBI was leaking to the trump people BEFORE they told Comey




you guys are fucked


its blatant and your going down
 
Giuliani brags about their surprise two days before Comey's Letter. Two days in advance he and the GOP had advance notice of what the FBI was up to.
This is a story that needs more coverage.
Rudy Giuliani brags about ties at the FBI — and Don Lemon just pointed the finger at him
 
evince said:
um guys


emails are not illeagal remember



tell me why two days before comey sent his letter to republicans in congress rudi julianni was on TV bragging that they had some NEW Hilary breaking news coming



Comey claims he found out the day before he sent the letter




who in FBI was leaking to the trump people BEFORE they told Comey




you guys are fucked


its blatant and your going down
Click to expand...

yus just having a private server to avoid foia is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top