signalmankenneth
Verified User
I can't stand made in China products! Seems like everything you buy nowadays is made in China, it's cheaply made and of poor quality too! I'm glad my cell was not made in China!
china is raising the price of their goods because they are not profiting
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Though Apple is reportedly making changes, for years every high tech gadget Apple sold was made in China.
And Apple products were revered for their high quality.
I'll occasionally buy a simpler product, work gloves for example, get them home only to find them made in China. That's when I wonder;
were they made with prison labor? Child labor?
evince
Truthmatters
this you slander snakes
evince
Truthmatters
can you weasels
cawacko
Well-known member
And the facts for that are what?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
not even the lock?
I can't stand made in China products! Seems like everything you buy nowadays is made in China, it's cheaply made and of poor quality too! I'm glad my cell was not made in China!
i actually find the quality all the same. There really is no reason to think they would provide lower quality goods.
cawacko
Well-known member
You like facts right Desh?
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?6670-Things-are-getting-dark/page13
you don't evil fuck
your poor child has a dirtbag liar as a father
you don't evil fuck
your poor child has a dirtbag liar as a father
evince
Truthmatters
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
Today,*06:05 AM
#181 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
You watch they will find a way to say it was the democrats fault.
I remember back in 1993 when congress passed ad Bill signed the bill which set us on the path to fiscal balence I turned to my husband and said " watch them try and claim this as their doing" They have done just that. The bill was signed without ONE single R vote and was credited by the CBO and the GAO as a major reason for the surpluses. The Rs base still thinks it was Newt. They will claim it , it will be twisted logic and some will buy it.
post 4
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:06 AM
#182 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
Heres the KEY. The rs have had complete control for the years.They even enacted some bankruptcy laws which made it harder for people to go bankrupt and save their homes not to mention they did nothing to fix the laws to protect uneducated buyers from this frenzy.
It is the fault of corporate whores and the republicans.
post 5
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:16 AM
#183 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
The economy has ups and downs. The idea is to use policy to keep them as shallow as possible. The Bush team used the subprime fiasco to bolster their economic situation instead of trying to nip it in the bud. The result is what we are seeing now. They alllowed the industry to wring many Americans dry to keep them shopping. It was irresponsible policy and it will haunt America for the next ten years.
BINGO
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:18 AM
#184 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by cawacko
With all due respect Desh, if you are not on the Democratic Party payroll you ought to be. You are the party's most ardent defender regardless. You should be remunerated for your effort.
post 17
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
Today,*06:05 AM
#181 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
You watch they will find a way to say it was the democrats fault.
I remember back in 1993 when congress passed ad Bill signed the bill which set us on the path to fiscal balence I turned to my husband and said " watch them try and claim this as their doing" They have done just that. The bill was signed without ONE single R vote and was credited by the CBO and the GAO as a major reason for the surpluses. The Rs base still thinks it was Newt. They will claim it , it will be twisted logic and some will buy it.
post 4
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:06 AM
#182 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
Heres the KEY. The rs have had complete control for the years.They even enacted some bankruptcy laws which made it harder for people to go bankrupt and save their homes not to mention they did nothing to fix the laws to protect uneducated buyers from this frenzy.
It is the fault of corporate whores and the republicans.
post 5
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:16 AM
#183 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by evince
The economy has ups and downs. The idea is to use policy to keep them as shallow as possible. The Bush team used the subprime fiasco to bolster their economic situation instead of trying to nip it in the bud. The result is what we are seeing now. They alllowed the industry to wring many Americans dry to keep them shopping. It was irresponsible policy and it will haunt America for the next ten years.
BINGO
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
Edit Post * Reply * Reply With Quote * *
Blog this Post * ** *
Today,*06:18 AM
#184 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,862
Thanks
6,110
Thanked 7,171 Times in 5,625 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts
Originally Posted by cawacko
With all due respect Desh, if you are not on the Democratic Party payroll you ought to be. You are the party's most ardent defender regardless. You should be remunerated for your effort.
post 17
http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-190.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/27/bu...in&oref=slogin
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
when a women says no it means no
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...70#post1529170
cawacko
Well-known member
Come on Desh. I'm holding baby girl right now and need to be entertained. Is the article I posted about manufacturing jobs going to Vietnam a lie? Why do you not believe that businesses were moving to countries other than China considering it's been going on for more than several years?
Mr. Shaman
Seer
Well.....at least someone learned something, from the for-profit health-in$urance indu$try!!
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/blog/how-insurance-companies-fight-recession-jack-your-premiums
*
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread...k-and-creates-problems-for-health-care-reform
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/blog/how-insurance-companies-fight-recession-jack-your-premiums
*
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread...k-and-creates-problems-for-health-care-reform
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Don't I know it, I was in Saigon in February and it is mind boggling how many factories have opened up since I was last there in 2011.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
evince
Truthmatters
Company officials said that eliminating an estimated $20*million in annual tariffs on Vietnamese-made products would reduce the cost of shoes for American consumers and boost sales. Furthermore, the officials said, declines in the company’s domestic manufacturing workforce have been offset by hiring in other departments.
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) or Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is a trade agreement among twelve of the Pacific Rim countries—notably not including China. The finalized proposal was signed on 4 February 2016 in Auckland, New Zealand, concluding seven years of negotiations. It is currently awaiting ratification to enter into force. The 30 chapters of the agreement aim to "promote economic growth; support the creation and retention of jobs; enhance innovation, productivity and competitiveness; raise living standards; reduce poverty in the signatories' countries; and promote transparency, good governance, and enhanced labor and environmental protections."[5] The TPP contains measures to lower both non-tariff and tariff barriers to trade,[6] and establish an investor-state dispute settlement mechanism.[5][7]
The TPP began as an expansion of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP or P4) signed by Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore in 2005. Beginning in 2008, additional countries joined the discussion for a broader agreement: Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Vietnam, bringing the total number of countries participating in the negotiations to twelve. Current trade agreements between participating countries, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, will be reduced to those provisions that do not conflict with the TPP or provide greater trade liberalization than the TPP.[8] The United States government considers the TPP a companion agreement to the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a broadly similar agreement between the U.S. and the European Union.[9]
Participating nations aimed at completing negotiations in 2012, but the process was prolonged by disagreements over contentious issues, including agriculture, intellectual property, and services and investments.[10] They finally reached agreement on 5 October 2015.[11] Implementing the TPP has been one of the trade agenda goals of the Obama administration in the U.S.[12] On 5 October 2015, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated he expected "signatures on the finalized text and deal early in the new year, and ratification over the next two years."[13] A version of the treaty text "Subject to Legal Review (...) for Accuracy, Clarity and Consistency"[14] was made public on 5 November 2015, the same day President Obama notified Congress he intended to sign it.[15]
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) or Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is a trade agreement among twelve of the Pacific Rim countries—notably not including China. The finalized proposal was signed on 4 February 2016 in Auckland, New Zealand, concluding seven years of negotiations. It is currently awaiting ratification to enter into force. The 30 chapters of the agreement aim to "promote economic growth; support the creation and retention of jobs; enhance innovation, productivity and competitiveness; raise living standards; reduce poverty in the signatories' countries; and promote transparency, good governance, and enhanced labor and environmental protections."[5] The TPP contains measures to lower both non-tariff and tariff barriers to trade,[6] and establish an investor-state dispute settlement mechanism.[5][7]
The TPP began as an expansion of the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPSEP or P4) signed by Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, and Singapore in 2005. Beginning in 2008, additional countries joined the discussion for a broader agreement: Australia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Vietnam, bringing the total number of countries participating in the negotiations to twelve. Current trade agreements between participating countries, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, will be reduced to those provisions that do not conflict with the TPP or provide greater trade liberalization than the TPP.[8] The United States government considers the TPP a companion agreement to the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a broadly similar agreement between the U.S. and the European Union.[9]
Participating nations aimed at completing negotiations in 2012, but the process was prolonged by disagreements over contentious issues, including agriculture, intellectual property, and services and investments.[10] They finally reached agreement on 5 October 2015.[11] Implementing the TPP has been one of the trade agenda goals of the Obama administration in the U.S.[12] On 5 October 2015, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper stated he expected "signatures on the finalized text and deal early in the new year, and ratification over the next two years."[13] A version of the treaty text "Subject to Legal Review (...) for Accuracy, Clarity and Consistency"[14] was made public on 5 November 2015, the same day President Obama notified Congress he intended to sign it.[15]
cawacko
Well-known member
It means you don't understand what's going on which is what we've said this entire thread. Costs rising in China aren't bringing a bunch of jobs back here.