china is raising the price of their goods because they are not profiting

And tasuke and Rune are clearly triggered that U.S. companies have off shored manufacturing to other Asian countries.
 
Today,*08:42 AM
#28 | Top

evince
Truthmatters

Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
58,807
Thanks
6,106
Thanked 7,164 Times in 5,618 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,494 Times in 4,129 Posts



Originally Posted by evince
Prices may go up as salaries and materials increasingly cost more, even as demand remains tepid.
The so-called “world’s factory” may finally no longer be a source for products as cheap as they are today.
After a prolonged time of boosting demands by making production costs more competitive than its rivals, prices of “Made in China” goods could be on the verge of rising, even as global demand remains tepid.
Bloomberg reports that Chinese manufacturers are beginning to consider price hikes as a way to recoup lost margins, after prices and production costs appear to have hit a new floor. Manufacturers interviewed by Bloomberg at various Chinese trade fairs have expressed a uniform sentiment of seeking possibilities to increase their prices to make up for rising labor and material costs, sometimes in order to survive in their respective industries.
I feel sorry for your child liar
 
Today,*09:00 AM
#34 | Top

cawacko
High Level of Addiction

Join Date
May 2007
Posts
31,086
Thanks
1,627
Thanked 6,991 Times in 4,853 Posts
Groans
2
Groaned 239 Times in 219 Posts



Originally Posted by evince
you fucking LIE right into the face of facts


you will be a shitty father
I will be a shitty father because the cost of doing business in China has been increasing and companies have been moving to other Asian countries? Makes total sense.
 
Desh, copying and pasting from a link doesn't tell us you know anything. You clearly have no idea where the movement of manufacturing to other Asian countries has gone
 
S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse
By STEPHEN LABATONSEPT. 26, 2008
Continue reading the main story
Share This Page
Share
Tweet
Email
More
Save
WASHINGTON — The chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a longtime proponent of deregulation, acknowledged on Friday that failures in a voluntary supervision program for Wall Street’s largest investment banks had contributed to the global financial crisis, and he abruptly shut the program down.
The S.E.C.’s oversight responsibilities will largely shift to the Federal Reserve, though the commission will continue to oversee the brokerage units of investment banks.
Also Friday, the S.E.C.’s inspector general released a report strongly criticizing the agency’s performance in monitoring Bear Stearns before it collapsed in March. Christopher Cox, the commission chairman, said he agreed that the oversight program was “fundamentally flawed from the beginning.”
“The last six months have made it abundantly clear that voluntary regulation does not work,” he said in a statement. The program “was fundamentally flawed from the beginning, because investment banks could opt in or out of supervision voluntarily. The fact that investment bank holding companies could withdraw from this voluntary supervision at their discretion diminished the perceived mandate” of the program, and “weakened its effectiveness,” he added.
 
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top