Tyra Banks: 'Enough of the damn emails

christiefan915 said:
The emails are all you have because you can't fault her knowledge and experience.

Too bad you can't say anything positive about Trump without bringing Hillary into it. That perfectly illustrates what a failure Trump is and how poorly-equipped to hold any office.
Click to expand...

With all due respect, and you know I hate Trump and am not voting for him, don't you post about half dozen anti Trump articles a day? When was the last time you posted an article saying this is a reason I support Hillary and this is an issue that's important to me?

This is in no way an attack on you. You e seen me and PMP go at it. But to your point don't you do what you complain about here?

Edit: if I wasn't on my phone I would post a picture of Troy P to show you it's love. :)
 
Last edited:
Now, voters have a Democratic candidate who, if elected, could before long be on trial and, if convicted, in jail.
Click to expand...
doubtful.
It's almost impossible to go after a POTUS for something like a classifed grossnegligence ( which the new FBI stuff wouldbe(
especially after Comey not indicting.

What it does do -along with her corruption is put in a POTUS who has "baggage" -criminal or right up to the line.
It will dog her ,and contribute to extreme polarization. I doubt she'll even get a "honeymoon".

More wasted time with POTUS and Congress is expected -but this just makes everything poisonous from the get go.
 
signalmankenneth said:
I couldn't give a rats-ass about these damn emails too!

(CNN)Model and TV personality Tyra Banks is on the campaign trail, encouraging voters in Georgia to vote for Hillary Clinton. But when asked by CNN's Fredricka Whitfield Saturday if reports of a new probe into Clinton's emails had made campaigning more difficult, Banks quoted the Democratic presidential nominee's former rival.

"I actually don't think there's anything new. To quote Bernie Sanders, 'enough of the damn emails,'" she said.
"We are here to unite to the country, to have hope and not to have hate. That is why I'm here. So enough of that," she added.

Banks also described her "personal connection" to Clinton, who she met eight years ago on her talk show. It was then, she told Whitfield, that Clinton impressed her, after rejecting the offer of receiving her questions in advance.
"So I asked her, when she got to the set, right before she was about to walk out, I said, 'Why did you do that?'

And she said, 'I just want to be real, raw, prepared for whatever you want to talk about, and I trust I'm going to be able to rise to the occasion of whatever you say.' I was just like, 'Oh, my gosh.' That's unheard of," Banks said.
The former "America's Next Top Model" host also praised Clinton's response to the the new email probe.

"The amazing thing is, Hillary said release it all. She wants to be transparent," Banks said.
"So, let's move away from that and focus on the future of this country. Let's focus on the issues," she added.

1001-tyra-banks-wig-getty-3.jpg
Click to expand...

Enough of monkeys thinking they're people.
 
Thing1 said:
Look at the 3,500 lawsuits against Trump from the "little guys" who he allegedly champions
Click to expand...

why?....because that's more important than accepting millions of dollars in bribes and promising Wall Street they will get to write their own regulations?......
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
being under FBI investigation, putting our national security at risk so you can avoid FOIA, lying about it, having your husband meet with the attorney general on an airport tarmac days before the FBI releases their findings, having your good buddy terry mccauliff give half a million dollars to comeys wife is quite a lot. and that's just the tip of the iceberg. she's corrupt as fuck. now we live in a day where we have our attorney general taking the 5th on giving billions to Iran and it's not even news.
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah
 
anatta said:
Oh I can find PLENTY of faults with Hillary's "knowledge and experience"

Start with Libya after her Iraq vote. She's an innate interventionist. she doesn't learn from her mistakes
Click to expand...

I was against the intervention in Libya too but I'm not going to pretend Gaddafi was the misunderstood saviour of his people. He was a contemptible dictator with a long history of human rights abuses.

Thousands of Libyans took to the streets and cheered when they learned he was dead. That says more to me than the sanitized version of Gadaffi's reign that we were fed.
 
what makes you turds think this little sack of emails will be anything but exculpatory like all the buckets of others of emails
 
tinfoil said:
Is it really that hard to read between the lines here? They obviously found classified emails on a computer that Huma shares with Weiner. They probably noticed that some of the emails came from Hillary's home server and they were probably forced to reopen the investigation because there were emails that were not among those emails that Hillary turned over. You get it? They saw that there were emails from Clinton's server that their previous records showed Hillary failed to turn over. What the fuck else could it be? Huma probably has her own email address on Hillary's server. So it'll turn out that Hillary didn't send the emails but had them deleted before turning over her emails to the FBI. What else could this be about?
Click to expand...

Then Hillary should be made aware of what was found. Even the experts say the emails could simply be copies of those already reviewed. I'm suspicious of Comey's timing and wouldn't be a bit surprised if, two weeks from now, he makes an announcement along the lines of "oops, my bad. There was nothing new that we haven't seen before. I felt obligated, though."
 
christiefan915 said:
I was against the intervention in Libya too but I'm not going to pretend Gaddafi was the misunderstood saviour of his people. He was a contemptible dictator with a long history of human rights abuses.

Thousands of Libyans took to the streets and cheered when they learned he was dead. That says more to me than the sanitized version of Gadaffi's reign that we were fed.
Click to expand...
do we need to do this again? whatever Qadaffi was -and he was a dictator -a"mixed bag" he's was a respected, legitimate leader of Libya - in good standing with the world, so much he was invited to the G-8 and shook Obama's hand.

Take that as a starting point and end up where we declare him a military target, where he never did anything to us, except help on the war on terror.
Take the fact we intervened in his civil war, against him.
Take the Pottery Barn rule into account ( you break it -you own it)
Take the various accouunts and State's own"tic toc on Libya" memo that shows Clinton was chief international architect,and US advocate for the Libyan war 2011
Take the conclusion that by her activism Clinton owns a significant,if not majority outcome of what Libya became post war,
and continues to be today -a failed terrorist state.
 
cawacko said:
With all due respect, and you know I hate Trump and am not voting for him, don't you post about half dozen anti Trump articles a day? When was the last time you posted an article saying this is a reason I support Hillary and this is an issue that's important to me?

This is in no way an attack on you. You e seen me and PMP go at it. But to your point don't you do what you complain about here?

Edit: if I wasn't on my phone I would post a picture of Troy P to show you it's love. :)
Click to expand...

Lol about my sweetie Troy. :loveu:

To be serious I mostly post anti-Trump articles for my personal amusement in watching how conservatives have thrown away everything they previously held holy to support and defend the deplorable. Everything cons have attacked liberals for has come back to bite them tenfold. Lying, cheating, scamming, assaulting, womanizing, adultery, multiple marriages... it all gets a pass even from evangelicals. It makes me think that Trump supporters have no core principles or a line they wouldn't cross.

This board has many Trump supporters. You must have noticed how they defend him on issues they would never defend in a liberal. What's up with that? You read over and over again the claim that Hillary is power hungry; I see Trump as more power hungry than anyone who ever came before him. He can't handle losing so he'll say anything about anyone no matter how false and outrageous it is when examined.

Years ago I said I wasn't sure Hillary was going to run for office again and got flak over that. Then I voted for Bernie in the primaries and supported him until the nominations were over. So I'm not the rigid Hillary supporter people think I am.

BUT...

It galls me no end to see the endless stream of lies pumped out about Hillary on a daily basis, and so I spend most of the time researching and debunking about 95% of them. Conservatives still don't care, even if every false comment has been parsed and researched and foot-noted up the wazoo. I would do the same had Bernie been our candidate.

I see the difference between Trump and Hillary as dark v. light, angry v. calm, pessimistic v. optimistic. I'm sick of looking at Trump's perpetual sneer and listening to his incoherent raging. If Trump took the word "Hillary" out of his campaign, he would have nothing. He is just that much of an arrogant know-nothing pretending he and he alone will "MAGA."

Btw, I also think it's ironic that for years cons have said "Obama hates America" yet they throw their support to a guy who actually campaigns on the slogan that America isn't great. It looks to me like Trump is the one who really hates America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top