Dirty president don:I ‘grab Them by the p*ssy’

Rana said:
I pray my sons and husband's never talk anywhere about feeling entitled to sexually assault women, that you dismiss simple as locker room banter is disgusting.
Click to expand...

I pray your daughters never trade their influence over how American tax payers money is spent for contributions to their personal slush fund charities........
 
What is Aleppo? said:
The email story just isn't the big deal you're making it out to be. No one cares. But you're practically obsessed beyond all reason.
Click to expand...

yeah, why would anyone give a fuck if a candidate did something illegal to hide what they are doing from the public and then lied about when caught, giving false testimony to congress, and covering everything up........its not like Nixon after all.......
 
I can't wait to watch Saturday Night Live tonight, it should be epic and prep Donald for the debate tomorrow!
 
Bill said:
Defend him to any length, no matter how pathetic...
Click to expand...

defend Hillary for giving Iran nuclear weapons, defend her for giving arms to ISIS, defend her for the attacks in Libya, defend her for telling Wall Street they could write our economic policy?.........what was it you were complaining about again?......a recording on ET?.......I'm so happy your concerns are so much higher than mine.......liberals have such high moral ground its hard to climb all the way out of the gutter.....
 
Bill said:
Defend him to any length, no matter how pathetic...

Don was right when he said younppl would support him no matter what... Sad really!!!!!
Click to expand...

What Trump said was reprehensible. Of course, I hear reprehensible speech at work, at the bar and etc so there's that too lol.

But I'm sorry, compared to what Hillary has *done*, it doesn't amount to a hill of beans. And no amount of posturing or feigning outrage will change that.
 
Bill said:
Bush ain't president------my bad Clinton ain't president,nor is he running,deflect much??? :palm:

You have a comment on the crotch grabber???
Click to expand...

Hillary has no problem with crotch grabbing presidents and cigars being inserted into her husband's interns pussies. The hypocrisy of hillary is running, and therefore fair.

The fact that you and other progressives are so focused on an 11 year old locker room conversation, but have no interest in the corruption, lies, and ineptitude of hillary goes to the further point that you don't give a flying fuck about truth.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
defend Hillary for giving Iran nuclear weapons, defend her for giving arms to ISIS, defend her for the attacks in Libya, defend her for telling Wall Street they could write our economic policy?.........what was it you were complaining about again?......a recording on ET?.......I'm so happy your concerns are so much higher than mine.......liberals have such high moral ground its hard to climb all the way out of the gutter.....
Click to expand...

:lies:
 
J Craft said:
Leave it to Cfan to salivate over pussy grabbing, all while denying, ignoring, defending Bill Clinton's rapes and sexual harassment. And never will she get so animated over the lies, corruption and ineptness' of Hillary if there's a juicy bit of unproven anonymous slandering against a GOP candidate.
Click to expand...

Please show my defense of Bill Clinton or admit you're a bare-faced liar.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I pray your daughters never trade their influence over how American tax payers money is spent for contributions to their personal slush fund charities........
Click to expand...

...the [Trump] foundation’s relatively small footprint led the Washington Post’s Fahrenthold to look elsewhere for evidence of Trump’s personal giving. After relentlessly calling charities with some affiliation to Trump, he ran into many “no comment” responses but found only one example of a cash gift (less than $10,000) during the period from 2008 to the launch of his campaign. Instead, much of Trump’s charity has come from his companies in the form of free rounds of golf or other in-kind gifts such as, most notably, conservation easements.

Unlike most private foundations, the funding of Trump’s own charity doesn’t actually come from the candidate himself – at least not in recent years.
Over the last decade, the Trump Foundation has largely relied on donations from others to support its giving. In fact, since 2008, no money flowing into the foundation came from the candidate himself...

As Fahrenthold’s investigations have discovered, Trump’s grants risk being viewed as serving improper political or personal ends. For example, the foundation made a prohibited payment to a political group affiliated with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. Around the same time, Bondi’s office declined to pursue an investigation into Trump University, raising allegations of a connection.
The foundation defended the payment as a mistake, and Trump personally reimbursed the funds and paid a $2,500 tax to the IRS for violating the prohibition on political expenditures. It is not clear that the foundation has done all things necessary to correct this transaction.

The foundation flirted with political campaign violations again this year when it made payments to veterans charities at Donald Trump for President political rallies. It allowed the campaign to present large foundation checks emblazoned with the political campaign motto “Make America Great Again.” Since political activity by charities is prohibited, the foundation put its exempt status with the IRS at substantial risk.

A second source of spending controversies surrounds the issue of self-dealing. Private foundations are prohibited from engaging in activities that are for the benefit of their founder or other “disqualified persons,” such as directors and officers.

The most public of these are the instances in which the foundation purchased items at charity auctions, such as an autographed Tim Tebow football helmet and two separate paintings of Trump himself (one of which is on display in a Trump-owned resort). The acquisition of the paintings is not per se problematic, but using the paintings in Trump private businesses is. Perhaps even more concerning is that the foundation made payments of over $250,000 to charities in order to settle private lawsuits of Trump businesses.

https://newrepublic.com/article/137522/trumps-charity-tells-us-lot-business
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top