What exactly is EXTREME VETTING & is it legal??

Vetting - so easy a child can do it.

002-power-wheels-corvette.jpg
 
So you libs are in favor of letting anyone in? Open borders is working well In France. Fucking idiots.
 
Legion Grind said:
And trolling through social media accounts that Muslims may or may not have will accomplish...?
Click to expand...
people post all kinds of stuff online. what sane reason is there not to do so?
it's not "trolling"- you of all trolls should understand that -it's specific to an individual who wants in the USA
 
anatta said:
people post all kinds of stuff online. what sane reason is there not to do so?
it's not "trolling"- you of all trolls should understand that -it's specific to an individual who wants in the USA
Click to expand...

he's pretending trolls take the time to actually READ posts.......
 
This Michigan panty-pisser could not name a single problem with the current vetting process for Syrian refugees.


564f90f71b0000260029e4de.jpeg

​



Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) was so concerned with gaps in the refugee-screening process that he announced Syrians would no longer be allowed to resettle in "his" state.

But when he was what parts of the security system concern him, he couldn't name any.

Snyder's logic, like that of some Democrats, seemed to be that it wasn't so much that he thought a specific part of the current system was bad -- just that if people were worried about it, regardless of whether those fears were warranted, it should be stalled.

He said he did not think the same type of "pause" was needed for other ways of entering the U.S., such as through tourist visas or the visa waiver program, which allows nationals of 38 countries to come in without a visa at all.

Most of the Paris attackers, including the alleged planner of the attacks, were either Belgian or French. Both of those countries are on the visa waiver program.





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/rick-snyder-syrian-refugees_564f7d1de4b0258edb317cff
 
Face said:
The SCOTUS has ruled several times that ideological tests for immigrants is perfectly Constitutional I'd be happier with a total ban on Muslim immigration though.
Click to expand...

Prb a lot of ppl would, but what about those already in USA?
 
Legion Grind said:
This Michigan panty-pisser could not name a single problem with the current vetting process for Syrian refugees.
Click to expand...

Trollop thinks there's currently a vetting process for Syrian refugees.......what's in place is the same system that let the San Berdadino terrorist into the country.....
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
It's not a constitutional issue and even phrased as 'partial Muslim immigration ban' it polled well. Now that Trump has reformulated it to 'ban on immigration from certain countries' it should poll even better.
Click to expand...

Poll better?

What countries are actually going to make the cut?
 
Face said:
They need to be asked specific questions regarding their beliefs; such as, how they feel about homosexuals, wife beating, leaving Islam, Jews, Sharia etc. many having been raised in their backwards culture since birth where these views are in the majority, acceptable, and mainstream will likely answer honestly, they certainly did in the PEW surveys.
Click to expand...

The average person might but not someone w other motivations?
 
Fear said:
If they are citizens then nothing unless they go to fight for the global jihad in which case they shouldn't be allowed back in, and if they do return try them for treason
Click to expand...

We both know you'll never fight ISIS, don't we, coward?

There's a word for people like you who bleat about terrorists but are too scared to fight them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top