Does Putin have the right work for a safer World without a dumb Clinton

Since the damn Russians jacked up the democrats convention to try and install Trump as president, it begs the question lol:

Why?

For their narrative to work it *has* to because Putin intends to take advantage of Trump in ways he couldn't Hillary. But anyone but democrat partisans know 'misguided and feckless' are the best adjectives that describe Hillary on the world stage.

Particularly, in the Middle East. Which, may be a clue as to why Putin may have putatively [aren't conspiracy theories fun lol!] hi-jinxed the Dem convention and jeopardized Hillary's run for president.

Maybe, Putin wants a realist in the WH. Someone less apt to get involved in Syria; someone more apt to help him go after ISIS.

Who the hell knows lol.
 
Good, good, Comrades. You are being assimilated into the Putin collective behind Strong Leader Trump, his puppet.
 
welcome back to the New Cold War..brought to you by that Old Warhawk Clinton ..
Obama got completely out-played on the global chessboard, and now Clinton will mindlessly dig in.

they are a bunch of mono-polarists in a multi-polar world. "contain Putin" and such crap.
 
anatta said:
welcome back to the New Cold War..brought to you by that Old Warhawk Clinton ..
Obama got completely out-played on the global chessboard, and now Clinton will mindlessly dig in.

they are a bunch of mono-polarists in a multi-polar world. "contain Putin" and such crap.
Click to expand...

Not to try and put lipstick on a pig lol, but Russia under Putin is a different animal than the old Soviet Union. So there can't be a Cold War, per se: the actors have changed.

I don't trust him but he's better than some of the other actors on the stage.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Not to try and put lipstick on a pig lol, but Russia under Putin is a different animal than the old Soviet Union. So there can't be a Cold War, per se: the actors have changed.

I don't trust him but he's better than some of the other actors on the stage.
Click to expand...
we're in a New Cold War. Putin is the same as the old Soviets.
Does he have reason to chaffe with NATO expansion tightly around his neck? I think so.

But is he willing to undermine the Ukraine gov't ( we do it too) and essentially control the east while seizing Crimea-
all the while exposing his "gas station economy" to crippling sanction? yes indeed.

We and the USSR ( sorry - "mother Russia") are careening down a path where we probe each other with Putin flyovers,
and US/NATO heavy naval presence in the Black Sea. NATO war games right on the Russian border.
Somebody's gonna slip up, and get hurt badly.. and gawd knows where that leads to.

The "Russian reset" was supposed to be a chance for a new Glasnost -instead because Clinton and Obama
will not recognize he fact Russia DOES HAVE legitimate concerns/spheres, it was just another silly misadventure.

"Mono-polar" means the US doesn't see Russian territorial interests as legitimate as western -
but of course we still demand cooperation on terrorism.

"Multi-polar" means seeing China and Russia for what they are, and not letting the New Cold war, become the same
ratchetted tensions/hair trigger of the Old Cold War.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top