Iraq & Benghazi

[Cancel 2020.1]

what's your position on the 'no bill' for hillary and her 'not sending classified material' through a private email server as SoS?

I did, but after you called it a shitty assumption, you doubled down by qualifying your thread of hypocrisy, double standards, and faux outrage as applying to the rights clamoring of iraq and benghazi only

And you're full of shit w/ that last line. What complete BS.

Every thread on a topic has to cover EVERY single issue related to it? Really? Is that your standard?

I'll remember that when you start threads, but we know that you don't do that already. You're unreal. I stand up for you on this board, but this is some twisted shite.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

I didn't realize Bush was running for president.

He's not. And that has nothing to do w/ my OP.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Poor Yurt; I guess I bruised his feelings yesterday.

 

[Seahawk]

Yawn, Thing doesn't have double standards, that would be you. You condemn everything liberal administrations do, but when Republicans do wrong there is no comment from, even though you claim you attack both. Here is your opportunity to attack the Republicans and all you can say is Waco.

This post is truly hilarious from the person who doesn't comment on her liberal friends doing the things she complains righties do on this site.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yawn, Thing doesn't have double standards, that would be you. You condemn everything liberal administrations do, but when Republicans do wrong there is no comment from you, even though you claim you attack both. Here is your opportunity to attack the Republicans and all you can say is Waco.

and this is rana not remembering shit............again. Do you need me to pull a desh and make multiple posts about the rights faux outrage over shit hillary did but got away with??????

I ripped the bush admin up one side and down the other over things like the patriot act and the iraq war, but they've not been in the whitehouse for almost 8 years now and this liberal administration has continued that very same policy, even going further with things like NDAA etc.

but hey, don't let reality stop you from making your own idiot leaps to conclusions about what I am and what i'm not.

 

[Seahawk]

He's not. And that has nothing to do w/ my OP.

Sure it does. The issue with Benghazi is brought up, not as the worst thing as you claim, but because Hillary is running for president.

You're just pulling your usual dopey routine.

 

[Legion Troll]

Poor Yurt; I guess I bruised his feelings yesterday.

At least he didn't call you dopey again.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

but hey, don't let reality stop you from making your own idiot leaps to conclusions about what I am and what i'm not.

Incredibly ironic, considering your posts about me on this thread.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

At least he didn't call you dopey again.

Ah, one post too late. LOL

 

[SmarterthanYou]

And you're full of shit w/ that last line. What complete BS.

Every thread on a topic has to cover EVERY single issue related to it? Really? Is that your standard?

I'll remember that when you start threads, but we know that you don't do that already. You're unreal. I stand up for you on this board, but this is some twisted shite.

dude, I RARELY stomp out anyone branching out any of my threads and you know this. you also know that YOU brought up one sides hypocrisy, double standards, and faux outrage. don't get pissy with me because you had your own shit thrown back at you. remember, I'm the one that labels the left and the right in office as the establishment....they are one and the same to me. unless you want to rally behind rana and state that I never criticize righties. If that's the case, maybe you should ask taft and USF how many times i've gone after them for their BS positions.

 

[Seahawk]

Where is my double standard?

From what I've read of you, you don't have many and seem to be pretty fair minded most of the time.

 

[Seahawk]

Ah, one post too late. LOL

Does it bother you when someone calls you dopey?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Does it bother you when someone calls you dopey?

Not when you do it, that's for sure. Are you trying to bother me?

I was just chucking at the post, because it came one post after you called me dopey again.

 

[Seahawk]

He obviously forgot a little thing like a 'congressional vote on the war' without which there would not have been a war.....

“necessary and appropriate in order to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq,”

 

[Seahawk]

Not when you do it, that's for sure. Are you trying to bother me?

I was just chucking at the post, because it came one post after you called me dopey again.

Good, I like your nickname.

You were my complete inspiration for it.

 

[Seahawk]

Bush misused that congressional vote, he lied and did not exhaust all diplomatic measures. He lied Iraqi and Americans died. Bush and his administration is responsible for Iraq.

Iraq was also not a thread to our national security.

 

[NOVA]

It will always be Bush's war. I actually never hear anyone argue like NOVA does - not even people like Hannity.

It doesn't even matter in the context of this thread. It's not what I'm talking about in the OP. I have no doubt that if bravs was at the convention, he'd be one of those earnest, indignant lunatics pumping their fist every time Benghazi gets mentioned. He's been one of the biggest Benghazi truthers on this board as it is.

Of course it was 'Bush's war'....thats why he asked to and RECEIVED permission form Congress to wage it.....and the undeniable fact is, without that vote,
there would have been no war.....I keep saying that and you keep mischacterizing my claim.....BDS will do that to you.

To quote you, "an Iraq thread certainly wouldn't be complete without bravs asserting again that "Dems in Congress pushed him into it!"

That post is a total lie, plain and simple. I said nothing even resembling that....a accurate statement would be, the resolution would not have passed without affirmative votes by a number of Democrats....
resulting in no approval of the war.....

But then, you are a liar....as I've just proven.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Of course it was 'Bush's war'....thats why he asked to and RECEIVED permission form Congress to wage it.....and the undeniable fact is, without that vote,
there would have been no war.....I keep saying that and you keep mischacterizing my claim.....BDS will do that to you.

Fine. At least you finally admit it's Bush's war.

That's a huge step for you. Congrats. Not sure what Congressional authorization has to do w/ the hypocrisy that I detailed in the OP, but if it makes you feel better.

 

[NOVA]

Fine. At least you finally admit it's Bush's war.

That's a huge step for you. Congrats. Not sure what Congressional authorization has to do w/ the hypocrisy that I detailed in the OP, but if it makes you feel better.

I've never denied it in the past.....I've said many times that congress knew exactly what they were voting for before they voted....war....shit, it wasn't unofficially called the

WAR resolution for nothing.....

and kudos to you for not denying you're a liar.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

I've never denied it in the past.....I've said many times that congress knew exactly what they were voting for before they voted....war....shit, it wasn't unofficially called the

WAR resolution for nothing.....

It actually wasn't called the war resolution by anyone but the media. But like I said, whatever makes you feel better for enthusiastically supporting that debacle, and then talking about Benghazi like it's the worst thing that America has been involved in.