Found Guilty For "Removal And Retention Of Classified Materials"

Jarod said:
1) Two different standards that mean different things.
Click to expand...

I'm waiting for someone to tell us the difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence......if you have knowledge of a defined standard for extreme carelessness, please provide it......

2) What she did does not fit into that subsection, as much as you really really badly want it to.
Click to expand...
it certainly appears to.....I ask again, please tell us which element is missing....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I'm waiting for someone to tell us the difference between extreme carelessness and gross negligence......if you have knowledge of a defined standard for extreme carelessness, please provide it......


it certainly appears to.....I ask again, please tell us which element is missing....
Click to expand...
it is the same thing/type of behavior.
 
Rune said:
A finding of Gross negilgence requires a carelessness so extreme as to almost want to hurt others.
Click to expand...
sorry no.....that is not a defined element of gross negligence......weren't you the one who linked the definition?......don't lie about it now....
 
Leonthecat said:
All of them.
There will be no indictment.
Click to expand...

The Republicans, because it is an election year and they are sucking air, struggling for life, will have their little grilling session with Comey, they will do their grandstanding, and try to drag this thing out until after the election somehow, costing millions, then they will concede that the FBI was right.

Comey will go back to his job, because from the speech yesterday, this guy is covering his ass big time, and he has investigated everything, as he stated yesterday, because I believe, he knew if there was no evidence to convict Hillary that there would be this blow back with their findings.
 
Jarod said:
Sorry but very different.

HRC did not download documents and then carry the device to foreign nations with her.
There is simply no precedence and the Gross Negligence subsection does not apply to what HRC did. I know it upsets you but its true.
Click to expand...

Mishandling information is mishandling information.

That is like saying "well the guy only stabbed him 40 times instead of 4 so it should be 1st Degree instead of involuntary manslaughter". The person is still dead.

The knots you twist yourself in to defend her are unbelievable. I would respect you more if you just said "yeah she fucked up but I don't care". That at least would be honest.

This makes you look uninformed and you are embarrassing yourself. At least Cunt Darcula was honest when she said she would support Crooked Hitlery Cuntoon no matter what.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top