Prove I'm a racist you lying bag of retardedness.
26 of the Dems who staged anti-gun sit-in are GUNOWNERS!!! HAHAHA
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
Prove I'm a racist you lying bag of retardedness.
the nytimes represents 85% of America? dumbass
No.You.Don't.
"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." -- West Virginia State Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943)
A catalogue of rights was placed in our Constitution, in my view, to protect the individual in his individuality, and neither statutes which put those rights at the mercy of officials nor judicial decisions which put them at the mercy of the mob are consistent with its text or its spirit. -- COMMUNICATIONS ASSN. v. DOUDS, 339 U.S. 382 (1950) (Justice Robert Jackson, concurring opinion)
"The first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted as they were soon after the adoption of the Constitution, are in the nature of a bill of rights, and were adopted in order to quiet the apprehension of many, that without some such declaration of rights the government would assume, and might be held to possess, the power to trespass upon those rights of persons and property which by the Declaration of Independence were affirmed to be unalienable rights." -- UNITED STATES v. TWIN CITY POWER CO., 350 U.S. 222 (1956)
A catalogue of rights was placed in our Constitution, in my view, to protect the individual in his individuality, and neither statutes which put those rights at the mercy of officials nor judicial decisions which put them at the mercy of the mob are consistent with its text or its spirit. -- COMMUNICATIONS ASSN. v. DOUDS, 339 U.S. 382 (1950) (Justice Robert Jackson, concurring opinion)
"The first ten amendments to the Constitution, adopted as they were soon after the adoption of the Constitution, are in the nature of a bill of rights, and were adopted in order to quiet the apprehension of many, that without some such declaration of rights the government would assume, and might be held to possess, the power to trespass upon those rights of persons and property which by the Declaration of Independence were affirmed to be unalienable rights." -- UNITED STATES v. TWIN CITY POWER CO., 350 U.S. 222 (1956)
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
You don't know Legion Fags MO by now. Much better having the muslime loving cock sucker on ignore.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
She says so. That is all she needs
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
I predicted that you couldn't explain how a gun-owning legislator who wants to regulate firearms is a hypocrite.
I was 100% correct.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
????....you needed an explanation?.....just how fucking stupid are you?.....
F_Donald_Weldon
Verified User
This fails as a straw man fallacy – House democrats advocating for a vote are not ‘anti-gun,’ hence the idiocy of the thread premise.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
so you think they're just pandering to the anti-gun crazies?........
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Dems should not own guns. Ever.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
The Constitution does not want these laws.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Fuck ThreeDee's fiancée. Most of Seattle has. 
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Fuck ThreeDee's fiancée. Most of Seattle has.
scrape Legion Troll off the bottom of your shoe......all the rest of us have......
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
EVerybody is in support of REGULATING guns. But dems want to ban guns - except for the govt and the elite of course. THINK, you miserable america-hating wretch.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Why should i lose a constitutional right just because some nameless bureaucrat arbitrarily puts my name on a list? THINK, america-hater.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Think so? Ask around.
I don't know you nor your sitch, so I have nothing to say about "YOU".... I gave some examples, you wanna talk about the nuts?? The folks on the no-fly list??
What about illegals?? SHould they have the constitutional right?? Felons?? Why not felons?? They are not exempted in the constitution are they??
That's horrible, shame on you.Fuck ThreeDee's fiancée. Most of Seattle has.