Trumpster Fire

Thing1 said:
I didn't bring up the scholarship. Tsuke did, dishonestly - trying to portray the lawyers association as an organization that was willfully doling out scholarships (multiple) specifically to illegal immigrants.

I mean, do you guys have anything here? Anything at all?
Click to expand...

So you admit that when you said the following, you lied.
Thing1 said:
No idea. But I love how seamlessly & shamelessly you quickly moved the goalpost from "joining organizations that give them scholarships."...
Click to expand...
 
Thing1 said:
Nice - you're buying right into the false talking points! Good to see.

They gave one student a scholarship in 2014, but the student only identified himself as undocumented after he was selected for the scholarship.
Click to expand...

You either totally missed the point or dodged it on purpose.

Forget the scholarships, if the judge is in anyway involved in Mexican or Latino activism [that the groups need to be racist is The strawman] those are your grounds for potential judicial bias against Trump.

Hence, 'because the judge is Mexican' means he has ideological reasons to be biased against Trump and nothing whatsoever to do with Trump's alleged bias towards Mexicans, generally. Aka, racism.

Case closed.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
You either totally missed the point or dodged it on purpose.

Forget the scholarships, if the judge is in anyway involved in Mexican or Latino activism [that the groups need to be racist is The strawman] those are your grounds for potential judicial bias against Trump.

Hence, 'because the judge is Mexican' means he has ideological reasons to be biased against Trump and nothing whatsoever to do with Trump's alleged bias towards Mexicans, generally. Aka, racism.

Case closed.
Click to expand...

Who said the group has to be "racist"?

I don't even know what you're talking about. You idiots & Trump apologists bought 100% into the knee-jerk Trump talking point that the judge belonged to a completely different "La Raza," which IS an activist group. Turns out, someone googled wrong, and it was actually just a lawyer's association.

But look at you - sticking to it 'til the end, and not giving an inch, even after that incredibly dishonest ploy was exposed. I've gotta admire the stubbornness. It mirrors everything I see from Trump surrogates on the cable shows.
 
Thing1 said:
Who said the group has to be "racist"?

I don't even know what you're talking about. You idiots & Trump apologists bought 100% into the knee-jerk Trump talking point that the judge belonged to a completely different "La Raza," which IS an activist group. Turns out, someone googled wrong, and it was actually just a lawyer's association.

But look at you - sticking to it 'til the end, and not giving an inch, even after that incredibly dishonest ploy was exposed. I've gotta admire the stubbornness. It mirrors everything I see from Trump surrogates on the cable shows.
Click to expand...

La Raza is a strawman, regardless of which one gets brought up. The only thing that matters is the potential for Trump to not be treated fairly by a judge who may have ideological reasons to be biased against him in a court of law. MAY have...

That's what you call putting the Trumpster fire out with a cold bucket of water lol.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
La Raza is a strawman, regardless of which one gets brought up. The only thing that matters is the potential for Trump to not be treated fairly by a judge who may have ideological reasons to be biased against him in a court of law. MAY have...

That's what you call putting the Trumpster fire out with a cold bucket of water lol.
Click to expand...

And what "ideological" reasons does this guy have to not treat Trump fairly?

Please. Explain this, while you're supposedly putting out Trump's fire.
 
Thing1 said:
I did, dummy. I said it was a lawyer's association. Glad you came around to realizing you had the wrong "La Raza."
Click to expand...

I only said La Raza and never made a specific designation; but you go right ahead and continue trying to arrive at your conclusions. :D
 
Thing1 said:
How so? It was you trying to defend what tsuke said.

Good lord, are you obtuse. I should listen to the other posters who have stopped engaging you. But I have hope for everyone. It's a flaw.
Click to expand...

OH, this is good.
Please show how I was defending what tsuke said, when all I asked is if the scholarship was pulled when it was discovered that the applicant lied by omission.
 
Thing1 said:
Who said the group has to be "racist"?

I don't even know what you're talking about. You idiots & Trump apologists bought 100% into the knee-jerk Trump talking point that the judge belonged to a completely different "La Raza," which IS an activist group. Turns out, someone googled wrong, and it was actually just a lawyer's association.

But look at you - sticking to it 'til the end, and not giving an inch, even after that incredibly dishonest ploy was exposed. I've gotta admire the stubbornness. It mirrors everything I see from Trump surrogates on the cable shows.
Click to expand...

La Raza was founded in 1968 and the lawyers group was founded in 1978.
I wonder if being a Hispanic organization of lawyers had anything to do with them adopting the La Raza part.
 
Thing1 said:
And what "ideological" reasons does this guy have to not treat Trump fairly?

Please. Explain this, while you're supposedly putting out Trump's fire.
Click to expand...

Maybe this:

The organization was formed with a desire to effect change in San Diego by representing the interests of the Latino community, identifying issues which involved the Latino community, and advocating for those issues
 
Thing1 said:
And what "ideological" reasons does this guy have to not treat Trump fairly?

Please. Explain this, while you're supposedly putting out Trump's fire.
Click to expand...

Seriously? Aren't you one of them that claim Mexicans/Hispanics have ample reason to not like Trump because of his talk of building a wall?

The term for that is 'ideological bias'.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Seriously? Aren't you one of them that claim Mexicans/Hispanics have ample reason to not like Trump because of his talk of building a wall?

The term for that is 'ideological bias'.
Click to expand...

I've been wondering that also; seeing as how the JPP liberals, the MSM, and everything else has been implying how much Trump is hated by the Hispanics voters.
 
USFREEDUMBRACIST said:
I've been wondering that also; seeing as how the JPP liberals, the MSM, and everything else has been implying how much Trump is hated by the Hispanics voters.
Click to expand...

What makes you think that an American federal judge would be against the building of a wall, Ma'am?
Why would Trump's promise to build a wall bias him?
 
PeonthefuckingPussy said:
What makes you think that an American federal judge would be against the building of a wall, Ma'am?
Why would Trump's promise to build a wall bias him?
Click to expand...

Seeing as how the JPP liberals, the MSM, and everything else has been implying how much Trump is hated by the Hispanics voters; do you have something to suggest he's for it, Peon?
 
Leonthecat said:
What makes you think that an American federal judge would be against the building of a wall, Ma'am?
Why would Trump's promise to build a wall bias him?
Click to expand...

Oh, I dunno lol. Aren't you one of those that claim Trump has no chance with Mexicans and Hispanics because of his immigration policy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top