Senator Jeff Flake (R) Arizona is calling for a convention challenge.
Ok, maybe next week. You'll see, it will be great, great I tell you, great.
Senator Jeff Flake (R) Arizona is calling for a convention challenge.
You mean the one that just died? Scalia? It happens, one doesn't have to be happy about it.
If he were elected president he could give a lawful order that if not carried out would result in punishment.
It stems from nothing more than Trump hating to lose, he hates losers.
When did he say that? Did I miss something?
what lawful order do you think that could be? you think trump could ORDER someone else to submit and help launch a nuclear weapon?
what lawful order do you think that could be? you think trump could ORDER someone else to submit and help launch a nuclear weapon?
hes talking about the killing of terrorist families. For the record i think if we were to do that the order would not be given to basic troops it would be given to black ops types and you will never hear about it.
Can you point to anybody wealthy who doesn't?
Really?
Where did I say that?
pretty sure that this has already happened under Obama, yet I bet Jarod wouldn't consider that an unlawful order.
No, he's saying that Mexican judge can't be impartial because he's associated with La Raza.
Anyone who doesn't see the distinction doesn't want to.
If Obama gave orders to kill the families of terrorists, simply for being families of terrorists, I would b every much against it.
If Obama gave orders to kill the families of terrorists, simply for being families of terrorists, I would b every much against it.
yes. Now if Trump meant use profiling for known terrorist families - OK fine.
The problem is Trump talks off the top of his head without thinking it out.
Clinton is gonna replay this stuff over and overAnd it utterly haunts him lol. It's the good and the bad with him. It's refreshing to have a presidential candidate who says what he thinks [the epitome of transparency] but he doesn't think before he talks. It's the downside to running a non-traditional campaign. Generally, you would have advisors saying 'you're going to be talking about this today and this is the way you ought to put it and by all means don't say this or that.'
Imagine if Hillary said what she was thinking all the time lol.
But Trump talks off the cuff like he's sitting around the table at the donut shop. It was a bone headed statement because it took the focus off of Hillary's troubles. He's lucky it's still early enough that many people will forget about it by the end of the month.
Politically, it will be interesting to see how Mexican Gate affects his poll numbers. The talking heads are all saying it's going to wreck his campaign. Problem is, their Trump-predicting track record isn't all that good lol. Some conservatives have unendorsed him over it, which is kind of pathetic in my mind. I don't have any use for a 'conservative' who cowers to political correctness.
I get the sense that people who take an honest assessment of it are going to look at the big picture. They're going to wonder why Trump gets the racist label while the Mexican 'protestors' who attacked white Trump supporters don't get the label. They are going to conclude a clear double standard. A very tired and threadbare, double standard.
Many are going to conclude Trump was misconstrued by a hostile media, and even by some in his own party who secretly wish his campaign would implode---even after endorsing him.
It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
Clinton is gonna replay this stuff over and over
( she is already doing it) as an endless $billion loop to drive his negatives up so high -whatever ideas he has won't be heard.
He gave a good speech last night, see how long he can go till he self trainwrecks again
He'll either learn his lesson or he won't.
And it utterly haunts him lol. It's the good and the bad with him. It's refreshing to have a presidential candidate who says what he thinks [the epitome of transparency] but he doesn't think before he talks. It's the downside to running a non-traditional campaign. Generally, you would have advisors saying 'you're going to be talking about this today and this is the way you ought to put it and by all means don't say this or that.'
Imagine if Hillary said what she was thinking all the time lol.
But Trump talks off the cuff like he's sitting around the table at the donut shop. It was a bone headed statement because it took the focus off of Hillary's troubles. He's lucky it's still early enough that many people will forget about it by the end of the month.
Politically, it will be interesting to see how Mexican Gate affects his poll numbers. The talking heads are all saying it's going to wreck his campaign. Problem is, their Trump-predicting track record isn't all that good lol. Some conservatives have unendorsed him over it, which is kind of pathetic in my mind. I don't have any use for a 'conservative' who cowers to political correctness.
I get the sense that people who take an honest assessment of it are going to look at the big picture. They're going to wonder why Trump gets the racist label while the Mexican 'protestors' who attacked white Trump supporters don't get the label. They are going to conclude a clear double standard. A very tired and threadbare, double standard.
Many are going to conclude Trump was misconstrued by a hostile media, and even by some in his own party who secretly wish his campaign would implode---even after endorsing him.
It will be interesting to see how it pans out.