Who’s Right and Wrong in the Middle East?

" Excellent article " ? As a committed Israeli propaganda pump your incorrect assessment of this pro-Zionist screed is to be expected. That you choose to disseminate this crap identifies you as an Internet stooge for Israeli criminality. It also marks you as a legitimate target for ridicule.

Let's begin with the LEGAL position.

Israel's occupation of Palestine is illegal under international law.

That in itself makes a mockery of the pro-Zionist tripe disguised as honest brockerage that you've mistakenly started this thread with. By the end of it you'll again be exposed as the Tory tosser for illegal occupation that you are.

Thank you for again bringing the plight of Occupied Paelstine to the media attention.
 
That got you on here soon enough, you are one of the myopic zealots mentioned in the article. I note that you still refuse to tell me why you won't condemn China for the same crime you allege is happening in Israel.

This is a struggle between good and evil, right and wrong. We can’t relax, can’t compromise, and we had no choice but to act.

On the contrary, this is a war in which both peoples have a considerable amount of right on their sides. The failure to acknowledge the humanity and legitimate interests of people on the other side has led to cross-demonization. That results in a series of military escalations that leave both peoples worse off.
Israelis are absolutely correct that they have a right not to be hit with rockets by Hamas, not to be kidnapped, not to be subjected to terrorist bombings. And Palestinians are absolutely right that they have a right to a state, a right to run businesses and import goods, a right to live in freedom rather than relegated to second-class citizenship in their own land.

Both sides have plenty of good people who just want the best for their children and their communities, and also plenty of myopic zealots who preach hatred. A starting point is to put away the good vs. evil narrative and recognize this as the aching story of two peoples — each with legitimate grievances — colliding with each other.

Just because the underlying conflict is between two peoples who each have plenty of right, that’s not to say that there are no villains. Hamas is violent, not only toward Israel, but toward its own people, and, in contrast to Israel, it doesn’t seem to try to minimize civilian casualties — its own or Israel’s. Hamas is not as corrupt as the Palestinian Authority, but it is far more repressive, and my impression from my visits to Gaza is that it’s also unpopular at home. Hamas sometimes seems to have more support on certain college campuses in America or Europe than within Gaza.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The pleasure is mine. We'll be laughing at you over dinner, Fool. You've become a comic distraction.
 
moon2012 said:
" Excellent article " ? As a committed Israeli propaganda pump your incorrect assessment of this pro-Zionist screed is to be expected. That you choose to disseminate this crap identifies you as an Internet stooge for Israeli criminality. It also marks you as a legitimate target for ridicule.

Let's begin with the LEGAL position.

Israel's occupation of Palestine is illegal under international law.

That in itself makes a mockery of the pro-Zionist tripe disguised as honest brockerage that you've mistakenly started this thread with. By the end of it you'll again be exposed as the Tory tosser for illegal occupation that you are.

Thank you for again bringing the plight of Occupied Paelstine to the media attention.
Click to expand...

You've said that a million times already, so why aren't you condemning China over the Spratly and Paracel Islands? Is because you don't really care about international law unless it suits your case?
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
You've said that a million times already, so what aren't you condemning China over the Spratly and Paracel Islands? Is because you don't really care about international law unless it suits your case?
Click to expand...

It was predictable that you would now attempt to distract from your own topic.

That's because your wagon has no wheels, Fool- and you've mistakenly attached your hoss to it.
 
moon2012 said:
It was predictable that you would now attempt to distract from your own topic. That's because your wagon has no wheels, Fool- and you've mistakenly attached your hoss to it.
Click to expand...
It is also predictable that you never answer the question even though I've asked several times now. If you were really and truly a believer in international law, then you would condemn all not just those who suit your agenda. Instead, you just act pompous and pissy in a fruitless attempt to avoid being shown to be a hacktivist.
 
Milagro said:
It is also predictable that you never answer the question even though I've asked several times now. If you were really and truly a believer in international law, then you would condemn all not just those who suit your agenda. Instead, you just act pompous and pissy in a fruitless attempt to avoid being shown to be a hacktivist.
Click to expand...
Oh and you were very late today, too much banjolele playing and shagging vestal virgins perhaps??
 
Milagro said:
You've said that a million times already, so what aren't you condemning China over the Spratly and Paracel Islands? Is because you don't really care about international law unless it suits your case?
Click to expand...

Horses for courses douchebarf.
 
Milagro said:
It is also predictable that you never answer the question even though I've asked several times now. If you were really and truly a believer in international law, then you would condemn all not just those who suit your agenda. Instead, you just act pompous and pissy in a fruitless attempt to avoid being shown to be a hacktivist.
Click to expand...

Troll.
 
Rune said:
You don't know?
Click to expand...
International law is supposed to apply universally, the clue is in the name. Yet our resident Hamas humper will not acknowledge that the Chinese are occupying land, in the form of islands, that are in international waters. So are you going to be equally pissy about it?
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
International law is supposed to apply universally, the clue is in the name. Yet our resident Hams humper will not acknowledge that the Chinese are occupying land, in the form of islands, that are in international waters. So are you going to be equally pissy about it?
Click to expand...

Didn't think so.
Common expression on your side of the pond.
In the context of this thread it means "why are you changing the topuc if the thread, retard."
 
Pulling America into this bullshit is the point of it. Starve the dogs of war.

No immigration of Jews or Muslims should be allowed. They're all crazy.
 
Milagro said:
International law is supposed to apply universally, the clue is in the name. Yet our resident Hams humper will not acknowledge that the Chinese are occupying land, in the form of islands, that are in international waters. So are you going to be equally pissy about it?
Click to expand...

You are simply trying to divert from your own topic because you got handed your ass in post #2. Waffle on, Fool. See you, Jiminy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top