It's not Jim Crow Laws,it's Federalism

utterly stupid and without merit. rejected. The issue goes to "gender identity" -not surgically changed.

I your haste to label me bigoted, and going agaisnt Obama for it's own sake, you use incorrect facts.
Which is typical. You either make shit up,or are congenitally unable to connect the dots.

Wrong.
Show how the birth certificate law excludes the surgically changed. It doesn't.
You don't get to reject my point.
My point is totally valid.

You would have females be forced to use the men's room because they are born with penises.

Hence my neverending scorn for you you fucking piece of shit.
 
It is all there is too discuss in a bigot thread.
You are unable to debate federalism ,the Xth..
I wonder if you even get the idea that the courts would be the first avenue for discrimination claims ? ( like gay marriage)
and that bypassing all this to make a protected class is gross over-reach for no reason other then social engineering.

You don't even have to agree with my perspective -it's open for debate,
but you do need to debate and not result to childish insults if you want to be taken as a serious voice. Your choice.
 
Wrong.
Show how the birth certificate law excludes the surgically changed. It doesn't.
You don't get to reject my point.
My point is totally valid.

You would have females be forced to use the men's room because they are born with penises.

Hence my neverending scorn for you you fucking piece of shit.
If that was your point, then I agree with the obvious that surgical transsexual results over-ride birth certs.
Your posts are clear as mud for the most part, so it's quite possible I misunderstood your gibberish.
 
You are unable to debate federalism ,the Xth..
I wonder if you even get the idea that the courts would be the first avenue for discrimination claims ? ( like gay marriage)
and that bypassing all this to make a protected class is gross over-reach for no reason other then social engineering.

You don't even have to agree with my perspective -it's open for debate,
but you do need to debate and not result to childish insults if you want to be taken as a serious voice. Your choice.

That's just it with the left---they don't want to debate. They want it shut down as soon as possible. That's what they love about the courts and executive power [at least when their guy is in office]. The same thing was done with climate change. Obama decided the debate was over, so he used the EPA to over regulate the coal industry. And by no means think for a minute they're done. If Hillary gets elected she'll get around to strangling the fracking industry in red tape.

The only thing distinct about Obama's decree regarding bathroom use is it's ridiculous aburdity and lack of economic importance.
 
You are unable to debate federalism ,the Xth..
I wonder if you even get the idea that the courts would be the first avenue for discrimination claims ? ( like gay marriage)
and that bypassing all this to make a protected class is gross over-reach for no reason other then social engineering.

You don't even have to agree with my perspective -it's open for debate,
but you do need to debate and not result to childish insults if you want to be taken as a serious voice. Your choice.

I don't need to be taken seriously by a lifelong Southerner who exudes racism, misogyny and bigotry, never mind war mongering you idiotic fool.
I have less than no use for you.
I don't post to please you or have pleasant discourse or gentlemanly debate or even to amuse myself at your expense.
I post solely to expose you as a fraud, you stand for everything I abhor, You are one of the people of the lie.
Your view of is that of one who can't see the forest because the trees are blocking the way.

When You tell me I can't connect the dots you are actually discussing your own exact lacking....my abilities to visualise and see patterns far exceeds anything you can even imagine.

Keep posting your bullshit all you like.
I will continue to effortlessly anihilate you.
 
That's just it with the left---they don't want to debate. They want it shut down as soon as possible. That's what they love about the courts and executive power [at least when their guy is in office]. The same thing was done with climate change. Obama decided the debate was over, so he used the EPA to over regulate the coal industry. And by no means think for a minute they're done. If Hillary gets elected she'll get around to strangling the fracking industry in red tape.

The only thing distinct about Obama's decree regarding bathroom use is it's ridiculous aburdity and lack of economic importance.

The rapid decline in the combustion of coal has been a godsend, almost a miracle that one person could acomplish so much in so little time. In a lot of ways Obama has been an incredible president.
Hopefully you are right about fracking as well.

Try to stretch your mind around this; the numbers quickly become so massive that the human mind can't begin to comprehend but..... start with 6 million gallons. That is the averave frack. Now figure the square area at a film thickness of 1 mm. Now take that to the fourth power. That is how many pounds of force is exerted during a frack.
If you comprehend this number but still believe fracking cannot cause earthquakes then you are unworthy of time.
Would you like to discuss other aspects of fracking or talk about why we need to burn even less coal?
 
Last edited:
If that was your point, then I agree with the obvious that surgical transsexual results over-ride birth certs.
Your posts are clear as mud for the most part, so it's quite possible I misunderstood your gibberish.

Don't try to blame your myopia and poor reading comprehension skills on my writing loser.

Yes, that is what you are fighting to do. The law is eminently clear, that is the reason the Feds are suing.
It isn't over reach at all, it is Federalism working exactly as the founders laid out. Government doing the right thing and just what it is supposed to be doing.
As I have said in the past, for God's sake learn what causes are about before you take them up.
 
I don't need to be taken seriously by a lifelong Southerner who exudes racism, misogyny and bigotry, never mind war mongering you idiotic fool.
I have less than no use for you.
I don't post to please you or have pleasant discourse or gentlemanly debate or even to amuse myself at your expense.
I post solely to expose you as a fraud, you stand for everything I abhor, You are one of the people of the lie.
Your view of is that of one who can't see the forest because the trees are blocking the way.

When You tell me I can't connect the dots you are actually discussing your own exact lacking....my abilities to visualise and see patterns far exceeds anything you can even imagine.

Keep posting your bullshit all you like.
I will continue to effortlessly anihilate you.
LOL.. you gonna vote for Hillary? Talk about warmongering..she takes the cake.
You'll support any Democrat, even an incompetent corporatist..Oh sure you say you support sanders
but when it comes down to it, you're a worthless partisan.
And then you call me a misogynist because I would never vote for that crap?
Libya/Syria is not enough for you, that you think being a Democrat is worth voting for that?

She's an interventionist. She should be condemned for the worldwide misery she's caused.

You're a blithering idiot. you haven't got an original idea, nor understand basic Constitutional separation/balance of powers.
Do you even know what federalism implies here?
You're reduced to calling me a "southerner" when I spent most of my life north of Washington DC -
which taught me that the DC crowd doesn't give a fuck about anything but self- aggrandizement of federal power.
Yet you blindly defend that notion when if you had a clue you'd see runaway federal powers have created an unresponsive bloated, unchecked bureaucracy

Bureaucracies and Their Derelictions

We ask ourselves why nothing seems to work anymore. Why has every government program turned into a boondoggle? Why are our schools failing, and why is it that the more money we pour into them, the more they fail?

The answer is surprisingly simple, though explaining it in detail and demonstrating it might be a little more complex. The real culprit in all of this is the presence of a burgeoning bureaucracy in every area of national life. Moreover, Jefferson warned about this problem, with special emphasis on government, almost 200 years ago
.
http://eyler.freeservers.com/JeffPers/jefpco34.htm

But you're too stupid to look past dogmatic memes.. all of which is your problem to solve.
As long as you turn up like unwanted dog shit stuck to the bottom of my shoes in my posts
I'll scrape you off and discard your crap "ideas" like the shit for brains they are.
 
The way to have good and safe government, is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the function he is competent to. Let the National Government be entrusted with the defense of the nation and its foreign and federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, laws, police, and administration of what concerns the State generally; the counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each ward direct the interests within itself." --Thomas Jefferson to J. Cabell, 1816.

Moreover, this principle was to be practiced within the agencies of government also, including agencies such as schools.
"If it is believed that... elementary schools will be better managed by the governor and council, the commissioners of the literary fund or any other general authority of the government than by the parents within each ward, it is a belief against all experience. Try the principle one step further, and... commit to the governor and council the management of all our farms, our mills and merchants' stores... No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to." --Thomas Jefferson to J. Cabell, 1816.
 
The rapid decline in the combustion of coal has been a godsend, almost a miracle that one person could acomplish so much in so little time. In a lot of ways Obama has been an incredible president.
Hopefully you are right about fracking as well.

Try to stretch your mind around this; the numbers quickly become so massive that the human mind can't begin to comprehend but..... start with 6 million gallons. That is the averave frack. Now figure the square area at a film thickness of 1 mm. Now take that to the fourth power. That is how many pounds of force is exerted during a frack.
If you comprehend this number but still believe fracking cannot cause earthquakes then you are unworthy of time.
Would you like to discuss other aspects of fracking or talk about why we need to burn even less coal?

In a lot of ways, November can't get here soon enough lol. You prove my point: you're not open to debate. Do you have any idea how insular and close-minded you are?

Which wouldn't be all that bad, but the country is being run by people just like you.
 
I post on the post, not the poster..it's a political board not a gossip board..
++

Here's another thing...Is this a problem in search of a solution? I haven't seen any documentation that the states were not accommodating ID trannys.
When issues are problematic they go thru the courts ( like gay marriage) where damage is shown.

What damage has been shown , where by the states accommodation was causing damage to the ID trannies?
*If it ain't broke don't fix it* what court cases are already involved?

The left is famous for conjuring problems where they don't exist. They did it with hate laws. In a country with 100's of millions of citizens there's going to be a smattering of incidences where race/religion/etc is the motivation for a crime against an individual. And since it's already illegal to assualt someone, hate crimes just amount to another layer of law over the existing statutes.

But that was never the point: the left wanted certain groups [the ones they favor of course lol] to be elevated to 'victim status'; primarily gays, blacks, currently Muslims---just about anyone who the left thinks should be protected from white Christians lol.

The National Potty Crisis is just more of the same: it's textbook liberalism in all of its absurd glory.
 
There’s plenty else to worry about in the controversial new law known formally as the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act.

The law not only reverses a Charlotte ordinance that had extended some rights to gay and transgender people.

It also prevents city and county governments from setting a minimum-wage standard for private employers and limits how people can sue for discrimination in state court. And it contains a provision allowing for remaining parts of the law to stand if others are struck down in court.

Those provisions are pernicious attempts to roll back rights, and they have been tucked into a bill that has a very different public face.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/not-about-bathrooms-critics-decry-north-carolina-laws-lesser-known-elements/2016/05/14/387946ec-186b-11e6-924d-838753295f9a_story.html
 
In a lot of ways, November can't get here soon enough lol. You prove my point: you're not open to debate. Do you have any idea how insular and close-minded you are?

Which wouldn't be all that bad, but the country is being run by people just like you.

Lol,who doesn't want to debate lol?
I gave you plenty of info to debate,lol I even threw you a couple extra topics and directly asked your opinion.Lol
Sorry liar you just proved it is you who will not debate. Lol.
 
The left is famous for conjuring problems where they don't exist. They did it with hate laws. In a country with 100's of millions of citizens there's going to be a smattering of incidences where race/religion/etc is the motivation for a crime against an individual. And since it's already illegal to assualt someone, hate crimes just amount to another layer of law over the existing statutes.

But that was never the point: the left wanted certain groups [the ones they favor of course lol] to be elevated to 'victim status'; primarily gays, blacks, currently Muslims---just about anyone who the left thinks should be protected from white Christians lol.

The National Potty Crisis is just more of the same: it's textbook liberalism in all of its absurd glory.

The law was written by a state you blithering idiot
 
The left is famous for conjuring problems where they don't exist. They did it with hate laws. In a country with 100's of millions of citizens there's going to be a smattering of incidences where race/religion/etc is the motivation for a crime against an individual. And since it's already illegal to assualt someone, hate crimes just amount to another layer of law over the existing statutes.

But that was never the point: the left wanted certain groups [the ones they favor of course lol] to be elevated to 'victim status'; primarily gays, blacks, currently Muslims---just about anyone who the left thinks should be protected from white Christians lol.

The National Potty Crisis is just more of the same: it's textbook liberalism in all of its absurd glory.

The law was written by a state you blithering idiot lol
 
Back
Top