Hillary Clinton promises to put U.S. miners out of work......

Coal production has been in decline for a very long time. To blame Obama or Hillary for it is a huge lie.

http://ieefa.org/appalachias-coal-industry-troubles-started-a-long-time-ago/
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Coal truck drivers, electricians, heavy equipment operators, heavy equipment mechanics and etc would disagree with you. And these are hardly minimum wage jobs Obama and Hillary are pledged to kill.
Click to expand...

The industry is killing miner's jobs. They are the ones who pledged to put miners out of work.
Underground miners are a liability to the industry.
 
Leonthecat said:
His claim is largely methane, I suspect.
Click to expand...

The domestic and international markets for coal are shifting.

Demand for coal is plummeting as cleaner forms of energy are cheap and easily available.

As this trend continues, so will the slow death march of fossil fuels.

The aging coal infrastructure means that by 2020, it will be too expensive to keep producing energy from coal at current levels.

While natural gas has eclipsed coal by being cheaper and cleaner, that alone doesn’t explain coal’s decline.

Consumers have been asking for cleaner, healthier, more efficient sources of energy for years, and investors and policy-makers have responded.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jigar-shah/post_11637_b_9690896.html
 
TheDonald said:
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2016/05/donald_trump_hillary_clinton_t.html You are too easy, go get your mother, she might be more challenging
Click to expand...

From the link you cited:


Trump says he would bring back lost coal-mining jobs, and he is positioning for the November election in big coal states by portraying Hillary Clinton as a job killer.

Trump, however, has yet to explain exactly how he will revitalize Appalachia's coal industry. To pull it off, he will have to overcome market forces and a push for cleaner fuels that have pummeled coal.

Coal's slump is largely the result of cheap natural gas, which now rivals coal as a fuel for generating electricity. Older coal-fired plants are being idled to meet clean-air standards.

Another hurdle for reviving coal mining in Appalachia: less coal. Reserves of coal still in the ground are smaller than in western states like Wyoming, the leading coal producer.

TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - [

Thanks for playing. :)
 
Legion Troll said:
From the link you cited:


Trump says he would bring back lost coal-mining jobs, and he is positioning for the November election in big coal states by portraying Hillary Clinton as a job killer.

Trump, however, has yet to explain exactly how he will revitalize Appalachia's coal industry. To pull it off, he will have to overcome market forces and a push for cleaner fuels that have pummeled coal.

Coal's slump is largely the result of cheap natural gas, which now rivals coal as a fuel for generating electricity. Older coal-fired plants are being idled to meet clean-air standards.

Another hurdle for reviving coal mining in Appalachia: less coal. Reserves of coal still in the ground are smaller than in western states like Wyoming, the leading coal producer.

TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - TRUMP IS LYING WHILE APPALACHIA'S DYING - [

Thanks for playing. :)
Click to expand...

You didn't get your Mommy, again you need to get your Mommy or wait about ten years before posting again. http://energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/clean-coal-research
 
TheDonald said:
You didn't get your Mommy, again you need to get your Mommy or wait about ten years before posting again. http://energy.gov/fe/science-innovation/clean-coal-research
Click to expand...

Mommy says you lied. :)

Donald Trump says he would bring back lost coal-mining jobs, and he is positioning for the November election in big coal states by portraying Hillary Clinton as a job killer.

Trump, however, has yet to explain exactly how he will revitalize Appalachia's coal industry.

To pull it off, he will have to overcome market forces and a push for cleaner fuels that have pummeled coal.

Coal's slump is largely the result of cheap natural gas, which now rivals coal as a fuel for generating electricity.

Older coal-fired plants are being idled to meet clean-air standards.

Another hurdle for reviving coal mining in Appalachia: less coal.

Reserves of coal still in the ground are smaller than in western states like Wyoming, the leading coal producer.



http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/mc-pa-fact-check-bringing-coal-jobs-back-to-appalachia-20160505-story.html
 
 
Legion Troll said:
Mommy says you lied. :)

Donald Trump says he would bring back lost coal-mining jobs, and he is positioning for the November election in big coal states by portraying Hillary Clinton as a job killer.

Trump, however, has yet to explain exactly how he will revitalize Appalachia's coal industry.

To pull it off, he will have to overcome market forces and a push for cleaner fuels that have pummeled coal.

Coal's slump is largely the result of cheap natural gas, which now rivals coal as a fuel for generating electricity.

Older coal-fired plants are being idled to meet clean-air standards.

Another hurdle for reviving coal mining in Appalachia: less coal.

Reserves of coal still in the ground are smaller than in western states like Wyoming, the leading coal producer.



http://www.mcall.com/news/local/elections/mc-pa-fact-check-bringing-coal-jobs-back-to-appalachia-20160505-story.html
 
Click to expand...

When your Mommy gets done cooking your farina, can you have her post her ideas here? because u r wey tou easi
 
Coal mining saw a worldwide boom lasting more than a decade after the millennium. Its share of global energy generation grew from 25 per cent to 30 in 2013, largely thanks to growing demand from China, which by 2013 was burning almost half of the world’s coal.

But boom has turned to bust. In 2014, China reduced its coal burning, last year there was a further fall.

Goodbye coal.

US coal companies like Peabody initially attempted to make up for lost US markets by exporting to China, only to discover that market shut too.

China’s coal imports fell by a third last year. The China trend is likely to be permanent, say analysts. It is the result of a decline in heavy industry, efforts to control killer smog in cities by mothballing hundreds of urban power stations, and growing investment in renewables to meet promises on curbing climate change.

Coal power stations are still being built, but for every plant built, plans for two are being shelved or cancelled.

Last year more than twice as much money was invested in new renewables energy generation equipment as in new coal-burning stations.

With oversupply and declining demand, coal prices on international markets have fallen. This has turned many mines into “stranded assets”, unable to pay back the billion-dollar investments made in them.

As a result, Peabody last year cut its estimate of the amount of mineable coal in its reserves from 9.3 billion tonnes to 6.3 billion tonnes.

The Paris Agreement on halting climate change can only accelerate the demise of the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.

Coal is a risky and expensive investment for any nation.

In the good times, Peabody bought up mines around the world, notably MacArthur Coal in Australia. It was also a prominent supporter of climate-change skeptics.

But last year, presaging its bankruptcy, Peabody’s share value fell by more than 90 per cent.

Perhaps if they had spent more time and money diversifying their business rather than sowing the seeds of doubt about the science of climate change, they might not have joined the long list of bankrupt global coal companies.



https://www.newscientist.com/article/2084292-whats-behind-bankruptcy-of-worlds-largest-private-coal-firm/
 
Legion Troll said:
Coal mining saw a worldwide boom lasting more than a decade after the millennium. Its share of global energy generation grew from 25 per cent to 30 in 2013, largely thanks to growing demand from China, which by 2013 was burning almost half of the world’s coal.

But boom has turned to bust. In 2014, China reduced its coal burning, last year there was a further fall.

Goodbye coal.

US coal companies like Peabody initially attempted to make up for lost US markets by exporting to China, only to discover that market shut too.

China’s coal imports fell by a third last year. The China trend is likely to be permanent, say analysts. It is the result of a decline in heavy industry, efforts to control killer smog in cities by mothballing hundreds of urban power stations, and growing investment in renewables to meet promises on curbing climate change.

Coal power stations are still being built, but for every plant built, plans for two are being shelved or cancelled.

Last year more than twice as much money was invested in new renewables energy generation equipment as in new coal-burning stations.

With oversupply and declining demand, coal prices on international markets have fallen. This has turned many mines into “stranded assets”, unable to pay back the billion-dollar investments made in them.

As a result, Peabody last year cut its estimate of the amount of mineable coal in its reserves from 9.3 billion tonnes to 6.3 billion tonnes.

The Paris Agreement on halting climate change can only accelerate the demise of the dirtiest of the fossil fuels.

Coal is a risky and expensive investment for any nation.

In the good times, Peabody bought up mines around the world, notably MacArthur Coal in Australia. It was also a prominent supporter of climate-change skeptics.

But last year, presaging its bankruptcy, Peabody’s share value fell by more than 90 per cent.

Perhaps if they had spent more time and money diversifying their business rather than sowing the seeds of doubt about the science of climate change, they might not have joined the long list of bankrupt global coal companies.



https://www.newscientist.com/article/2084292-whats-behind-bankruptcy-of-worlds-largest-private-coal-firm/
Click to expand...

So many words that no one will ever read..................
 
The left has put coal in its sights. If the free market were allowed to work as it should coal would be crushing it. Of course libtards have been convinced that they get all the free electricity they want from unicorn farts
 
Leonthecat said:
Coal production has been in decline for a very long time. To blame Obama or Hillary for it is a huge lie.

http://ieefa.org/appalachias-coal-industry-troubles-started-a-long-time-ago/
Click to expand...

Obama/Hillary pledged to kill it. In 2008 Obama said he was going to kill coal and cause electric bills to "skyrocket". If coal were to rebound [Im wary of energy market analysts because they're same people who told us that the world was running out of oil, lol] president Hillary and the liberals in congress will see to it that it stays dead.

Miners around here wouldn't piss on either of them if they were on fire, and I don't blame them.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Obama/Hillary pledged to kill it. In 2008 Obama said he was going to kill coal and cause electric bills to "skyrocket". If coal were to rebound [Im wary of energy market analysts because they're same people who told us that the world was running out of oil, lol] president Hillary and the liberals in congress will see to it that it stays dead.

Miners around here wouldn't piss on either of them if they were on fire, and I don't blame them.
Click to expand...

Libtards are such idiots. Obama places all sorts of obstacles in the way of coal while helping other industries and the libtards foolishly claim "it's the free market"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top